Freedom of Speach (but only if...)
You guys all need to realize that dumb ***** liberals only mean "Freedom Of Speech" when you agree with them. If you don't then they use THEIR Freedom Of Speech to tell you to be quiet and put all their energy keeping you quiet. Sh$t like this is why liberals are ruining this country...
KC-10 FE out...
KC-10 FE out...
Originally Posted by KC-10 FE
You guys all need to realize that dumb ***** liberals only mean "Freedom Of Speech" when you agree with them. If you don't then they use THEIR Freedom Of Speech to tell you to be quiet and put all their energy keeping you quiet. Sh$t like this is why liberals are ruining this country...
KC-10 FE out...

KC-10 FE out...

They figured out long ago that they didn't have to be right to win an argument. They just have to outlast the other guy and prevent him from making a coherent point by shouting him down, or interrupting constantly with inflammatory ignorance.
Here is the deal…
Liberals are indeed quite smart for being so stupid. They figured out how America works. In other words they know most of America works and don’t have lots of free time to be spewing about non-sense that means nothing for the vast majority of us.
Who goes to protest? Most of them are professionals and not just someone that decided to take a day off work, take a cut in pay, and not feed the family for a day to go marching around about some stupid BS.
The liberals learned long ago the squeaky wheel gets the grease. There can be 1 liberal to 100 other normal people but since the 1 liberal, a professional hater, professional protestor, professional thief, and professional illusionist has the free time and loud enough mouth if they spew long enough they can have many “weak minded” people actually believing what they, the liberal, says is actually true.
Think about it, you can have one nut case going around for weeks and months screaming the sky is green and if no one is responding back by telling people its actually blue you will have a lot of “weak minded” and poorly educated (thanks liberals) believing the sky is green and we need to drink red KoolAid to make the sky blue again.
It’s how they get people to drink the KoolAid…
I have always said the best way to end ALL liberal programs is for all us working people to just stop working for 6 months and let those receiving aid due to stupid liberal programs die off or step to the plate…
Only the strongest will survive and you can’t survive on KoolAid alone…
Liberals are indeed quite smart for being so stupid. They figured out how America works. In other words they know most of America works and don’t have lots of free time to be spewing about non-sense that means nothing for the vast majority of us.
Who goes to protest? Most of them are professionals and not just someone that decided to take a day off work, take a cut in pay, and not feed the family for a day to go marching around about some stupid BS.
The liberals learned long ago the squeaky wheel gets the grease. There can be 1 liberal to 100 other normal people but since the 1 liberal, a professional hater, professional protestor, professional thief, and professional illusionist has the free time and loud enough mouth if they spew long enough they can have many “weak minded” people actually believing what they, the liberal, says is actually true.
Think about it, you can have one nut case going around for weeks and months screaming the sky is green and if no one is responding back by telling people its actually blue you will have a lot of “weak minded” and poorly educated (thanks liberals) believing the sky is green and we need to drink red KoolAid to make the sky blue again.
It’s how they get people to drink the KoolAid…
I have always said the best way to end ALL liberal programs is for all us working people to just stop working for 6 months and let those receiving aid due to stupid liberal programs die off or step to the plate…
Only the strongest will survive and you can’t survive on KoolAid alone…
Originally Posted by 01 XLT Sport
I have always said the best way to end ALL liberal programs is for all us working people to just stop working for 6 months and let those receiving aid due to stupid liberal programs die off or step to the plate…
I don't mind taking a few days off from work but I don't want or need a six month vacation.
...and back to the original topic....
I think it's too bad that these young college students feel the need to conduct themselves in the way they did when Coulter was trying to speak. I'm not sure how much the press covered the way the students reacted, or that they had organized specificly to disrupt the speech. I was listening to a CT conservative radio show today and the people from the UCONN campus, from both "sides" agreed that the disruption was planned. Now, where would students learn a tactic like that? ? So, what all the liberals are telling me that they think the country should be run like it's going through a bad divorce? That's pretty much how these "progressives" are choosing to conduct themselves.
Boortz had a brilliant point when he suggested that one must actually be a taxpayer in order to vote. Those who are at the recieving end of the tax dollars (welfare recipients, etc) should not have a vote as to how everybody else's money is spent. Those providing the dollars should be the ones voting.
But the liberal politicians have spent too many years promoting the 'evil rich' persona to the minions on which they feed. "Tax the evil rich in order to help the poor poor pitiful poor". The sapsuckers lap it up.
But the liberal politicians have spent too many years promoting the 'evil rich' persona to the minions on which they feed. "Tax the evil rich in order to help the poor poor pitiful poor". The sapsuckers lap it up.
Originally Posted by Frank S
I've never heard her spewing forth hate. Let's see some quotes...
I just can't read these as 'making a coherent point',
they seem full of emotion and the emotion I sense isn't love.
"we should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."
The "backbone of the Democratic Party" is a "typical fat, implacable welfare recipient"
To a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."
That last one bothered me.
He lost his legs and she wasn't even frigging born yet?
And he caused us (her) to lose something?
(oh man! I'm feeling the hate!)
The Country is in desperate need of honest debate and the exchanging of ideas. Her contribution is to pour gasoline on debate and hope a spark ignites the process. She applies 90% of her rhetoric to attacking the messenger rather than the points of the message. It is easier than addressing the idea and it appeals to her ‘base’.
I dismiss her and others of her ilk as counterproductive. She isn’t good for the Country. There is no ‘value added’. She is making a good living driving opposing views farther apart.
No one can discuss serious issues with a constant smirk on their face, rolling their eyes, almost giggling with delight and have your and my best interests at heart. When I watch her, it’s as if she knows something I don’t and it’s something painfully obvious and she has to struggle to hold back laughter at anyone who doesn’t ‘get it’.
Blonde-smile-attack-suppress giggle, it is excellent shtick.
I believe she brings nothing to the table.
Ann Coulter, loves Ann Coulter. If she loved America she would put her ‘keen intellect’ to good use.
(I reread all of the above and if it was about someone else, she could have wrote it, however since this thread is about her and not her views, I should get a pass.)
It is easy writing though, maybe I should get a blonde wig, shave my legs and hit the circuit.
I dismiss her and others of her ilk as counterproductive. She isn’t good for the Country. There is no ‘value added’. She is making a good living driving opposing views farther apart.
No one can discuss serious issues with a constant smirk on their face, rolling their eyes, almost giggling with delight and have your and my best interests at heart. When I watch her, it’s as if she knows something I don’t and it’s something painfully obvious and she has to struggle to hold back laughter at anyone who doesn’t ‘get it’.
Blonde-smile-attack-suppress giggle, it is excellent shtick.
I believe she brings nothing to the table.
Ann Coulter, loves Ann Coulter. If she loved America she would put her ‘keen intellect’ to good use.
(I reread all of the above and if it was about someone else, she could have wrote it, however since this thread is about her and not her views, I should get a pass.)

It is easy writing though, maybe I should get a blonde wig, shave my legs and hit the circuit.
Originally Posted by Raoul
The Country is in desperate need of honest debate and the exchanging of ideas. Her contribution is to pour gasoline on debate and hope a spark ignites the process. She applies 90% of her rhetoric to attacking the messenger rather than the points of the message. It is easier than addressing the idea and it appeals to her ‘base’.
I dismiss her and others of her ilk as counterproductive. She isn’t good for the Country. There is no ‘value added’. She is making a good living driving opposing views farther apart.
No one can discuss serious issues with a constant smirk on their face, rolling their eyes, almost giggling with delight and have your and my best interests at heart. When I watch her, it’s as if she knows something I don’t and it’s something painfully obvious and she has to struggle to hold back laughter at anyone who doesn’t ‘get it’.
Blonde-smile-attack-suppress giggle, it is excellent shtick.
I believe she brings nothing to the table.
Ann Coulter, loves Ann Coulter. If she loved America she would put her ‘keen intellect’ to good use.
(I reread all of the above and if it was about someone else, she could have wrote it, however since this thread is about her and not her views, I should get a pass.)
It is easy writing though, maybe I should get a blonde wig, shave my legs and hit the circuit.
I dismiss her and others of her ilk as counterproductive. She isn’t good for the Country. There is no ‘value added’. She is making a good living driving opposing views farther apart.
No one can discuss serious issues with a constant smirk on their face, rolling their eyes, almost giggling with delight and have your and my best interests at heart. When I watch her, it’s as if she knows something I don’t and it’s something painfully obvious and she has to struggle to hold back laughter at anyone who doesn’t ‘get it’.
Blonde-smile-attack-suppress giggle, it is excellent shtick.
I believe she brings nothing to the table.
Ann Coulter, loves Ann Coulter. If she loved America she would put her ‘keen intellect’ to good use.
(I reread all of the above and if it was about someone else, she could have wrote it, however since this thread is about her and not her views, I should get a pass.)

It is easy writing though, maybe I should get a blonde wig, shave my legs and hit the circuit.

For the record....and as a die hard conservative....
I agree with you.
Originally Posted by vader716
For the record....and as a die hard conservative....
I agree with you.
I agree with you.
For a guy that skips from one side of the fence to the other depending on the issue at hand....I agree with the both of you.....
Originally Posted by wstahlm80
For a guy that skips from one side of the fence to the other depending on the issue at hand....I agree with the both of you..... 

guess I'm stuck out to the right.
Raoul--Now put thew quotes in context. As I read them I could see two ways to interpret them. I've seen her in interviews and she does rub me the wrong way, but I have never seen where she has been spewing hate.
I guess since 'Hate Crimes' have been defined, using the word 'Hate' has become too strong to use in informal conversation. It's like I said 'Murder' or 'Rape' and where is my proof etc...
Allow me to change 'hate' to 'caustic' or 'bitter',
and add 'without social redeeming value'.
Allow me to change 'hate' to 'caustic' or 'bitter',
and add 'without social redeeming value'.
Originally Posted by Raoul
The Country is in desperate need of honest debate and the exchanging of ideas. Her contribution is to pour gasoline on debate and hope a spark ignites the process. She applies 90% of her rhetoric to attacking the messenger rather than the points of the message. It is easier than addressing the idea and it appeals to her ‘base’.
I dismiss her and others of her ilk as counterproductive. She isn’t good for the Country. There is no ‘value added’. She is making a good living driving opposing views farther apart.
No one can discuss serious issues with a constant smirk on their face, rolling their eyes, almost giggling with delight and have your and my best interests at heart. When I watch her, it’s as if she knows something I don’t and it’s something painfully obvious and she has to struggle to hold back laughter at anyone who doesn’t ‘get it’.
Blonde-smile-attack-suppress giggle, it is excellent shtick.
I believe she brings nothing to the table.
Ann Coulter, loves Ann Coulter. If she loved America she would put her ‘keen intellect’ to good use.
(I reread all of the above and if it was about someone else, she could have wrote it, however since this thread is about her and not her views, I should get a pass.)
It is easy writing though, maybe I should get a blonde wig, shave my legs and hit the circuit.
I dismiss her and others of her ilk as counterproductive. She isn’t good for the Country. There is no ‘value added’. She is making a good living driving opposing views farther apart.
No one can discuss serious issues with a constant smirk on their face, rolling their eyes, almost giggling with delight and have your and my best interests at heart. When I watch her, it’s as if she knows something I don’t and it’s something painfully obvious and she has to struggle to hold back laughter at anyone who doesn’t ‘get it’.
Blonde-smile-attack-suppress giggle, it is excellent shtick.
I believe she brings nothing to the table.
Ann Coulter, loves Ann Coulter. If she loved America she would put her ‘keen intellect’ to good use.
(I reread all of the above and if it was about someone else, she could have wrote it, however since this thread is about her and not her views, I should get a pass.)

It is easy writing though, maybe I should get a blonde wig, shave my legs and hit the circuit.

So... If someone, other than Ann Coulter, said the things she says, and without the attitude, then the message would carry more weight? If so, then I think we agree. I liked her at first; but, as time goes on, she grates on my nerves; and, it embarrasses me to admit we share a lot of common ground.




