Re:New Escalade V8 403HP. What is in Ford's engine pipeline?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:46 AM
  #16  
crand002's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PiggNFord
Are they gonna put the 400HP motor in a chevy half ton? And who said we had the least HP in the full size world. We have more HP than the Chevy 5.3 and the Toyota, and the non-Hemi Dodges. If you say we are the SLOWEST in the fullsize world, then you've got something.

The Chevy offers the 6.0L 345hp motor in thier trucks called the Max. That thing hauls serious @#!.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #17  
crand002's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SAJEFFC
Actually yes it would. I get 32 mpg out of my 5.4 now, why would I want to give that up?
Hell, I get 60 mpg when I reset my mpg computer while cruising down a sloping freeway.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #18  
asinatra's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Also look who [tries] to slam our trucks in commercials. All the other auto manufactures do, why? Because they know our truck is better. Take toyota for instance, what the **** is up with their commercials ... "its longer [garage doot closes on back of truck]" ... whomever made that commercial should get hit by a train.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 05:10 AM
  #19  
Power Kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
OK since I posted this thread, there has been @ 17 reply's and they all suck. You all get an "F". The lowest mark goes to the guy claiming to get 32 MP w/his 5.4L. Go into drug rehab. Crystal Meth is dangerouse stuff dude!Several guys blathering on about a cammer motor that had as much chance as making it into a F-150 as Walter Mondale had becoming president. The fuel milage argument doesn't fly as anyone that concerned with fuel mialge, simlpy won't buy a full size truck. And if they do it wil be either a Nissan or Chevy as they get metter milage and are both quicker than our current 5.4L. And yes, as of today we have more HP than Chevy and Toyota. But they both have new trucks coming within what, 1 year and both will easily exceed our 300. (and they both test faster/quicker than ours now never mind then) And I'm well aware of the current advantages offered by the F-150 over the competition, otherwise I would't be driving one. Why must it be an either / or argument? For the purpose of this thread, I'm only debating the powertrain. And my question is what, if anything will Ford do to retain mkt share when all other makes (Dodge/Nissan/Chevy/Gm/Toyota) all exceed our maximum F-150 HP ratings?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 05:57 AM
  #20  
khindal's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
I think he was kidding about 32mpg. I hope I don't get graded, I will fail for sure!

Kevin
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #21  
freekyFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by Power Kid
OK since I posted this thread, there has been @ 17 reply's and they all suck. You all get an "F". The lowest mark goes to the guy claiming to get 32 MP w/his 5.4L. Go into drug rehab. Crystal Meth is dangerouse stuff dude!Several guys blathering on about a cammer motor that had as much chance as making it into a F-150 as Walter Mondale had becoming president. The fuel milage argument doesn't fly as anyone that concerned with fuel mialge, simlpy won't buy a full size truck. And if they do it wil be either a Nissan or Chevy as they get metter milage and are both quicker than our current 5.4L. And yes, as of today we have more HP than Chevy and Toyota. But they both have new trucks coming within what, 1 year and both will easily exceed our 300. (and they both test faster/quicker than ours now never mind then) And I'm well aware of the current advantages offered by the F-150 over the competition, otherwise I would't be driving one. Why must it be an either / or argument? For the purpose of this thread, I'm only debating the powertrain. And my question is what, if anything will Ford do to retain mkt share when all other makes (Dodge/Nissan/Chevy/Gm/Toyota) all exceed our maximum F-150 HP ratings?
I don't know...but I think I'm too stupid to reply!
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #22  
mwheue's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wash
[QUOTE=And my question is what, if anything will Ford do to retain mkt share when all other makes (Dodge/Nissan/Chevy/Gm/Toyota) all exceed our maximum F-150 HP ratings? [/QUOTE]

I dont think ford has to have the horsepower. Fuel economy sells also! Horsepower is a plus.... Put me in a truck that looks awsome/gets 27-28 mpg -VS- a 450HP 10mpg version and ill take the mileage.
 

Last edited by mwheue; Nov 11, 2005 at 10:28 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:45 AM
  #23  
khendrix2374's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Murray , Kentucky
ORIGINAL POST...."How will ford Sell Nav's"

I'm not an expert, but I would venture to say that most Navigator owners aren't as concerned about power as they are comfort. and face it, if your in the market for a Lincoln, you prolly dont really care that much about MPG anyways.

Just my 2 cents
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #24  
RamSS/T's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,651
Likes: 0
From: Albany, GA
Originally Posted by mwheue
Put me in a truck that looks awsome/gets 27-28 mpg -VS- a 450HP 10mpg version and ill take the mileage.

That would be great but most F150s (including mine) get 13-15 MPG not 27-28. SOOO give me the choice of 300 HP/13mpg and 450HP/10mpg I would have to take the 450HP. 50HP per MPG seems like a good trade.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #25  
mwheue's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wash
The horsepower -vs- mpg trade is exactly what im getting at. If ford keeps 300hp and can up the mpg then they would still be as competitive as if they up the horsepower and lose mpg. Hope that makes sense! I for one would also prefer more horsepower as I have spent lots of money for more power, But if I could get lots more mpg I would go that way also.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #26  
crand002's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Power Kid
OK since I posted this thread, there has been @ 17 reply's and they all suck. You all get an "F". The lowest mark goes to the guy claiming to get 32 MP w/his 5.4L. Go into drug rehab. Crystal Meth is dangerouse stuff dude!Several guys blathering on about a cammer motor that had as much chance as making it into a F-150 as Walter Mondale had becoming president. The fuel milage argument doesn't fly as anyone that concerned with fuel mialge, simlpy won't buy a full size truck. And if they do it wil be either a Nissan or Chevy as they get metter milage and are both quicker than our current 5.4L. And yes, as of today we have more HP than Chevy and Toyota. But they both have new trucks coming within what, 1 year and both will easily exceed our 300. (and they both test faster/quicker than ours now never mind then) And I'm well aware of the current advantages offered by the F-150 over the competition, otherwise I would't be driving one. Why must it be an either / or argument? For the purpose of this thread, I'm only debating the powertrain. And my question is what, if anything will Ford do to retain mkt share when all other makes (Dodge/Nissan/Chevy/Gm/Toyota) all exceed our maximum F-150 HP ratings?
As of today we only have more horsepower than the Tundra and Honda 1/2 tons.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #27  
fatman66's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
Originally Posted by Power Kid
The fuel milage argument doesn't fly as anyone that concerned with fuel mialge, simlpy won't buy a full size truck. And if they do it wil be either a Nissan or Chevy as they get metter milage and are both quicker than our current 5.4L.
I'll give you that the GM 5.3 gets consistently better milage than the 5.4, but that Nissan Endurance 5.6 is second only to the HEMI im craptastic mpg. Sure some guys will get 17mpg with a Titan and some will get 14 mpg with the F-150 with but I'm guessing that if you average it up over a large number of trucks and drivers you'll be able to follow the displacement from the iForce 4.7, Vortec 5.3, Triton 5.4, Endurance 5.6 and HEMI 5.7

Actually, I think that's what Consumer Reports found when they tested all the full size trucks. The Titan is many things but overall more gas efficient than the F-150 isn't one of them.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #28  
04 RED LARIAT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 1
From: Ky/Va Mountains
Do people really look and worry that much about mpg?

Ford needs to make a big a$$ powerful motor for those of us that want it, then the mpg motor for everyone else.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #29  
ViperGrendal's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: FL
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=217103 my original post on this.
link to the article: http://www.dieselforecast.com/Articl...?articleID=208

This might be the direction Ford is gonna take next.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 04:20 PM
  #30  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by 04 RED LARIAT
Do people really look and worry that much about mpg?

Ford needs to make a big a$$ powerful motor for those of us that want it, then the mpg motor for everyone else.
I think that was the plan with the 4.6 but never worked out. Gets the same mileage.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 AM.