Honda making a truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #16  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Just imagine how mean that thing would be with a couple of Type-R decals.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #17  
BHibbs's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Looks better than a Titan.... Barely...
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #18  
Rockpick's Avatar
Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31,440
Likes: 4
From: The Bluegrass State
MOVED AND MERGED...
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 12:33 AM
  #19  
fx4scab's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Sorry RP. Shouldn't have posted that in the 04/05 board. Just tryin to keep you on your toes. ...Works for me though.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #20  
fx4scab's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Originally posted by BHibbs
Looks better than a Titan.... Barely...
Think I like the looks of the Titan much better. Now the concept Honda, from what I remember, looked hella cool compared to this thing. But the production versions never look as good as the concepts ...in my opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 02:06 AM
  #21  
COFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
WOW...i would much rather own a titan than that pile of ugly junk......i am going to enjoy rolling up next to one and having a good laugh
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 09:46 AM
  #22  
Scubaman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
I betcha it is a mini-van frame!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #23  
Bancho's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, CT
Originally posted by kamikaze2b
Isn't the engine in the Canyon/Colorado made in China?
The engine you're thinking of is the 3.4L V6 in the Equinox.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #24  
95cobraR's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 3
From: Sandy Springs, GA USA
Honda

Unibody constuction? No V-8? 5000# towing? 1100# payload?
$27-32K price?

Why would any serious truck buyer get the Honda when they could get an F-150 for less: it has a V-8, up to 9800#'s of towing, up to 3000#'s of payload, and a real fully boxed frame?

I didn't pay but $32K for a SD, but the SD doesn't have a compartment for a cooler .
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #25  
Bancho's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, CT
Re: Honda

Originally posted by 95cobraR
Unibody constuction? No V-8? 5000# towing? 1100# payload?
$27-32K price?

Why would any serious truck buyer get the Honda when they could get an F-150 for less: it has a V-8, up to 9800#'s of towing, up to 3000#'s of payload, and a real fully boxed frame?

I didn't pay but $32K for a SD, but the SD doesn't have a compartment for a cooler .
You answered your own question. Simply put, the Ridgeline isn't targeted at the serious truck buyer. For the people who wanted an SUV but want something they can get a bit dirty and/or fit more awkwardly shaped cargo the Ridgeline may seem an ideal solution. Look at the Avalanche, Baja, Sport Trac and the variety of small crew cab trucks with stunted beds. The Ridgeline actually competes well there and should most likely sell very well. Anecdotal evidence aside, Honda builds a quality product (very appliance-like but reliable).
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #26  
Rockpick's Avatar
Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31,440
Likes: 4
From: The Bluegrass State
Originally posted by fx4scab
Sorry RP. Shouldn't have posted that in the 04/05 board. Just tryin to keep you on your toes. ...Works for me though.
NP
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #27  
JD's Avatar
JD
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada (originally from Kearny, New Jersey)
That's the key, Honda builds a quality product. My wife has an Accord, the dealership is fantastic, you can't get any better. Two FORD dealerships I've used here s@ck! Total difference in customer service, that's for sure...
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #28  
95cobraR's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 3
From: Sandy Springs, GA USA
Re: Re: Honda

Originally posted by Bancho
Simply put, the Ridgeline isn't targeted at the serious truck buyer. For the people who wanted an SUV but want something they can get a bit dirty and/or fit more awkwardly shaped cargo the Ridgeline may seem an ideal solution.



Edit: For some reason it will not allow me to delete those double paragraphs.
 

Last edited by 95cobraR; Jan 31, 2005 at 08:23 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #29  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Interesting. It'll prolly sell many units based on the all show and no go concept. As far a 1/2 ton pick up goes. I thought all of the truck calssified as 1/2 ton were actually 1 tons. Look at the F150, isn't the Chovie, Dodge, and other imposters around the 3000 payload level now. I thought in order to get a truck with 1000# of payload capacity you had to buy a small truck (Ranger, S-10 or what ever they're called now, Dakota).
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #30  
cia-agent's Avatar
Bighersh Alter-Ego
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: 33.02N / 96.66W
None of the light-dutys have a payload nearign 3,000 lbs. But, they are approaching 1-ton (2,000 lbs). I think the F-150 has a payload capacity of 1,880 lbs or so~ the highest in the class, unless the Titan took that claim too.

The Honda will do well- it's more truck than 90% of us truckers routinely use anyway. It's just not as big, and won't be as thirsty; but it will be a Honda- which means you can drop a frickin' anvil on the engine from the top of the Empire State Bldg, and the truck will still br ready for a cross-country trek.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.