what republicans say about GWB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #46  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally posted by arrbilly
Then why do they **** you off so much that you fly into spittle-spewing rage??
Very discriptive, and very funny.

Did "spittle-spewing rage" strike anyone else as funny?

lol
 

Last edited by wittom; Nov 1, 2004 at 06:16 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #47  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally posted by wittom
Very discriptive, and very finny.

Did "spittle-spewing rage" strike anyone else as funny?

lol

It's even more funny when you imagine it being said with a C0CKney accent.



Then why do they **** yer off so much that yer fly into spittle-spewin' rage?, isit?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:34 PM
  #48  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
People, no need to get nasty and uncivil here, we are only good for one vote a piece unless you hang around with some liberals who believe “some” people should be allowed to vote where ever and as many times as they wish…

FACT:

The war in Iraq was NOT unjust, it was justified by just about everybody from every party. President Clinton, Hillary, Algore, Kerry and the vast majority of liberals, democrats, conservatives and republicans were in COMPLETE agreement with the war in Iraq, that is the FACT no ifs, ands, butts or spin about it.

Now, what was UNJUST was how the liberals, in general, played the war for politics and politics only, they put and our putting our children’s lives on the line. Kerry, the biggest liberal of them all is ONLY politics when it comes to the war on terror and specifically Iraq. The coward fool completely supported the war to begin with and then backed down like the little coward he is and he did so like he did with his lies and betrayals of those that served in Vietnam, he did it for POLITICS and POWER only…


So, the question is, will the American public put our children’s lives at risk by electing Kerry or will they put our children lives at ease with a real leader President Bush. I know what choice the American public will make because I have my finger on the pulse and they will chose to protect their children, to protect their future and to protect their country, the American people will reelected President Bush 3 – 6 points…
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #49  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Naah, it proves we aren't afraid to get up into your redneck face
Wrong on both accounts.LMAO. First, you got in my cyber-internet face. So I guess you're a tough guy. Secondly, it's impossible for an Italian yankee to be a redneck.

sKerry voters
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #50  
loudist's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Future Son in Law of Spork
Originally posted by 01 XLT Sport
People, no need to get nasty and uncivil here, we are only good for one vote a piece unless you hang around with some liberals who believe “some” people should be allowed to vote where ever and as many times as they wish…

FACT:

The war in Iraq was NOT unjust, it was justified by just about everybody from every party. President Clinton, Hillary, Algore, Kerry and the vast majority of liberals, democrats, conservatives and republicans were in COMPLETE agreement with the war in Iraq, that is the FACT no ifs, ands, butts or spin about it.

Now, what was UNJUST was how the liberals, in general, played the war for politics and politics only, they put and our putting our children’s lives on the line. Kerry, the biggest liberal of them all is ONLY politics when it comes to the war on terror and specifically Iraq. The coward fool completely supported the war to begin with and then backed down like the little coward he is and he did so like he did with his lies and betrayals of those that served in Vietnam, he did it for POLITICS and POWER only…


So, the question is, will the American public put our children’s lives at risk by electing Kerry or will they put our children lives at ease with a real leader President Bush. I know what choice the American public will make because I have my finger on the pulse and they will chose to protect their children, to protect their future and to protect their country, the American people will reelected President Bush 3 – 6 points…
Here he goes again claiming facts that aren't facts at all.

"FACT:

The war in Iraq was NOT unjust, it was justified by just about everybody from every party. President Clinton, Hillary, Algore, Kerry and the vast majority of liberals, democrats, conservatives and republicans were in COMPLETE agreement with the war in Iraq, that is the FACT no ifs, ands, butts or spin about it.


Prove it sporky.
I'll bet you can't.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:10 PM
  #51  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally posted by 01 XLT Sport
FACT:

The war in Iraq was NOT unjust, it was justified by just about everybody from every party. President Clinton, Hillary, Algore, Kerry and the vast majority of liberals, democrats, conservatives and republicans were in COMPLETE agreement with the war in Iraq, that is the FACT no ifs, ands, butts or spin about it.
The facts are the facts, no ifs, ands, butts, or spin about it...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #52  
loudist's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Future Son in Law of Spork
Originally posted by 01 XLT Sport
The facts are the facts, no ifs, ands, butts, or spin about it...
Like I said, you have to prove this ridiculous statement.
Just because you say its fact is facts doesn't make it so.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #53  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally posted by loudist
Like I said, you have to prove this ridiculous statement.
Just because you say its fact is facts doesn't make it so.
History makes it so my friend, history makes it so...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #54  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Just because you say its fact is facts doesn't make it so
Time for slowist to find out for himself. Check and see what the "official" stance of the Clinton Administration was from 1997-2001 on Iraq. Then get back to us. Game, set, match.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #55  
loudist's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Future Son in Law of Spork
Well... looks like sporky has a reach around buddy.
Excellent.
Just remember the colonels motto...
You'll both have each other for comfort on Wednesday when your horse gets put back on the ranch.

[cue song: tumblein' tumbleweeds]
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #56  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #57  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally posted by loudist


[cue song: tumblein' tumbleweeds]

That reminds me...



All my heroes have been cowboys.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 04:23 PM
  #58  
Arc's Avatar
Arc
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally posted by vvyk3d
its pretty funny to see a bunch of guys talking about abortion when it really doesnt effect you any. Last i checked guys cant have babies unless something has changed recently. When you get a bunch of fat white politicians discussing whats best for women thats a bit of a conflict if you ask me. None of them will have to go through any of what a woman goes through in either keeping the child, giving it up for adoption, or aborting it. Ah well, lets see some scripture now on how its against god, i havent seen any of that in a few days. We need a smiley in flame suit to go along with the puking smiley.
A women should and does have the right to choose. She has the right to choose whether or not to have sex. If she chooses to have sex and then amazingly enough becomes pregnant then her choices are OVER!
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #59  
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally posted by 01 XLT Sport
People, no need to get nasty and uncivil here, we are only good for one vote a piece unless you hang around with some liberals who believe “some” people should be allowed to vote where ever and as many times as they wish…

FACT:

The war in Iraq was NOT unjust, it was justified by just about everybody from every party. President Clinton, Hillary, Algore, Kerry and the vast majority of liberals, democrats, conservatives and republicans were in COMPLETE agreement with the war in Iraq, that is the FACT no ifs, ands, butts or spin about it.

Now, what was UNJUST was how the liberals, in general, played the war for politics and politics only, they put and our putting our children’s lives on the line. Kerry, the biggest liberal of them all is ONLY politics when it comes to the war on terror and specifically Iraq. The coward fool completely supported the war to begin with and then backed down like the little coward he is and he did so like he did with his lies and betrayals of those that served in Vietnam, he did it for POLITICS and POWER only…


So, the question is, will the American public put our children’s lives at risk by electing Kerry or will they put our children lives at ease with a real leader President Bush. I know what choice the American public will make because I have my finger on the pulse and they will chose to protect their children, to protect their future and to protect their country, the American people will reelected President Bush 3 – 6 points…
There is a huge difference you neglect. The liberals, wanted to investigate the intelligence before going to war. GW simply found the excuse he was looking for, so he and his PNAC pals could set up shop in Iraq. Perhaps you never read Kerry's statement when he voted to give GW authority, but if you do, you'll see he wanted to VERIFY THE INTELLIGENCE. It goes (or would have) went a long way towards credibility, something GW lacks. If you have enough intelligence to read, and understand the statement, you'll see that Kerry has not changed as far as his stand on Iraq goes. My apologies to Bush fans, as there are NO catch phrases in the speech.




"As the President made clear earlier this week, "Approving this
resolution does not mean that military action is imminent or
unavoidable.'' It means "America speaks with one voice.''

Let me be clear, the vote I will give to the President is for one
reason and one reason only: To disarm Iraq of weapons of mass
destruction, if we cannot accomplish that objective through new, tough weapons inspections in joint concert with our allies.

In giving the President this authority, I expect him to fulfill the
commitments he has made to the American people in recent days--to work with the United Nations Security Council to adopt a new resolution setting out tough and immediate inspection requirements, and to act with our allies at our side if we have to disarm Saddam Hussein by force. If he fails to do so, I will be among the first to speak out.

If we do wind up going to war with Iraq, it is imperative that we do so with others in the international community, unless there is a showing of a grave, imminent--and I emphasize ``imminent''--threat to this country which requires the President to respond in a way that protects our immediate national security needs."
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #60  
vvyk3d's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Arc
A women should and does have the right to choose. She has the right to choose whether or not to have sex. If she chooses to have sex and then amazingly enough becomes pregnant then her choices are OVER!
Says who? You? Who are you to make that decision?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.