Yep, 1441 people, Saddam got his *** beat like a dog because of 1441...

 

Israel regularly violates UN resolutions and we are their best friends. Our foreign policy is at best inconsistent.

 

Don't presume to know me or know how I would respond. Don't presume I would attack you like you are attacking me because you posted a conservative source.

At least the other conservative members of this board expressed valid opinions in disagreement with the video clip. They did not resort to attacking or me or presuming to know what I would or would not say.

 

who the hell are we to waltz into another country and destroy it just because they wouldn't prove something to us? especially a country we didn't have diplomatic relations with? Iraq didn't owe it to us to prove anything to us. again, our foreign policy is inconsistent at best. we're not attacking N. Korea because they would light us up with nukes. But N. Korea has given us a dozen different stories about thier nuclear program in the last year.

 

You apparently have a guilty complex, you chose not to deny the accusation?

You still did not answer my question, did you even watch the full show on Sunday morning?

 

So it's been a year now and we still don't know for a fact if Iraq was an imminent {likely to happen wothout delay } threat to this country. Or we just haven't been told yet.

 

come on bandit_193, why would a deny an accusation for a hypothetical situation? you didn't post a conservative link and I didn't attack you, so what is there to deny. I was simply saying that your retort about the way liberals respond to conservative sources was a bit ridiculous and presumptuous since you and I have never had that type of interaction.

and for the record, I did not watch Face The Nation that Sunday.

 

apparently our allies are even thinking that our government pulled a fast one. it ain't looking good for G-Dubya...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp.../poland_iraq_3

 

The last thing we need is to have the Pollacks against us.

They have the despicable suicide phone bombers.

A Pollack terrorist gets a hand grenade, and calls a phone number at random. When you get the call, as soon as you answer he pulls the pin.

If things get any worse for us here, we are going to have to close the borders to keep the Mexicans in.

 

President Bush has nothing to worry about. The entire free world, those associated with the United Nations might since this is where ALL the facts about Iraq came from…

Why do liberals completely bypass that “little” detail? What President Bush stated to us Americans in nothing different then what Clinton had stated to us Americans and nothing different then what the ENTIRE United Nations stated to the world.

It is a “little” detail, but it really doesn’t matter since Kerry doesn’t stand a chance of ever becoming President. Americans are now beginning to learn the “truth” about Kerry, something Kerry has misled Americans on in the past. We have another 8 months to learn even more about Kerry, so things are looking VERY BAD for Kerry…

 

There is a huge difference though 01 XLT Sport. The UN and Clinton did not send troops to invade Iraq and kill at a low estimate, 10,000 Iraqis (from NPR today). The UN was waiting for more data or at least for its members to agree. The one with egg on his face regarding this war is our president Bush, not Clinton and not the UN.

 

The ONLY difference is everyone else was TALKING about it but didn’t have the COURAGE to back their talk. President Bush had the COURAGE to back up his talk with real action.

That is the difference between getting things done and letting things fester. Everyone else let it fester to the point that terrorist actually came here and flew planes into buildings. Clinton talked a good talk and then played around because he didn’t have the courage to act properly for his country. Clinton did what the polls suggested he do in order to maintain as many people liking him as possible.

That is the difference between a real leader and a follower. Clinton was a follower, President Bush is a leader because he does not need the polls to tell him what the proper action is. Leaders don’t worry about making as many people like them as possible because they KNOW if they lead correctly and properly then those people will understand later on why it was the right thing to do.

America does not need another “buddy” running the country, we got that with Clinton. America needs and now has an “adult” running the country…

10,000 Iraqis, no biggie seeing that the vast majority of them were in the military. Actually I could care less if we had killed 10,000,000 of their military personal that is war and they could have saved their life’s by putting down their weapons and coming out with a white flag.

Were there some civilians that got killed? I am sure there was, but oh well so sad that is life and that is the price they pay for not taking care of the situation themselves. I absolutely hate to see one innocent civilian killed in military action be it friend of foe but I get so SICK AND TIRED of the whinny *** liberals bringing this up when they continue to FORGET that over 3,000 INNOCENT civilians were killed in America and there was absolutely no reason for it. So while it is sad that some innocent civilians may have died in Iraq the fact of the matter is due to our absolutely AWESOME MILITARY Iraq should be very VERY thankful it was so few of their civilians that were killed due to our expertise in fighting an outstanding war and kicking Saddam’s *** in hours…

So the Iraqis are indeed lucky so few died at American hands, but rather at Saddam’s hands even DURING the war when Saddam did as he did the last time by blowing up some of his own buildings with his own people in them to get sympathy from his liberal buddies from France, Germany (those he paid off big time to stop the *** whooping) and all his followers here in America who loved him and miss him dearly…

So next time you want to quote some bogus death figures please include the number that Saddam killed during the war to win the love of the liberals here, because I can tell you this there is NO WAY in hell that American troops killed anywhere near 2,000 innocent civilians in Iraq let a lone 10,000

 

Ha Ha Ha!!!!

Guess which one is from LA!!!

 

Man, it's like a script All Republicans have to follow now:

1. Change story and focus from WMD to UN Resolutions

2. Blame Clinton to get focus off of Bush

3. Deny, deny, deny and go back to step 1.

 

BrewMaster is doing fine and so am I. However your comment is typical of a liberal, side step the “real” issue and start the smoke screen and blame game on everyone one or thing for why you can not come up with a legitimate and logical post…

You must work for Kerry…