F-250 / Super Duty / Diesel

Is the 5.4 really stronger than the 460?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 02:57 AM
  #1  
jdpollen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
Is the 5.4 really stronger than the 460?

I've been reading some threads in the SD forums, and have come across a couple of tidbits about the 5.4 actually being stronger (I'm guessing more hp and torque) than the old 7.5 L 460. After some surfing, then only info I came across for the 460 is 240 hp, but no torque ratings. I know the 5.4 2V (in '03) is rated at 260 hp and 300 lb/ft torque (or close to that), and the new 3 valver is rated at 300 hp and 365 lb/ft torque, so I'm curious if my 2003 F150 (with the 5.4) is actually stronger than my 1996 F250 with the 460 I just got a few weeks ago?
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 03:36 AM
  #2  
Lumadar's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
The 460 for that year has 410 torque I believe. If not that, it would be 390 at the least. So, it has more torque...either way, but less HP by 10.

Pretty even...
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #3  
adrianspeeder's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 27
From: Dover AFB DE / Harrisburg PA
But no doubt that heavy duty truck is gonna take more abuse than any of these newer F150s.

Adrianspeeder
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #4  
jdpollen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
Originally Posted by adrianspeeder
But no doubt that heavy duty truck is gonna take more abuse than any of these newer F150s.

Adrianspeeder

You're not kidding, my F250 rides like a brick, but it'll handle a 30' trailer with 7,500 lbs of lumber a WHOLE lot better than my F150. I completely agree that the suspensions between the two are like night and day, just thought it was interesting that 5.4 was pretty closely matched to the 460 in power numbers.
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #5  
Brian 5.4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
No way, no how. I have towed with both and the 460 is in a completely and totally different class, I don't care what the numbers say. There is simply no replacement for displacement.
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 11:24 PM
  #6  
mrainey889's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Cool

I agree...the 460 is a better towing/brute force motor. I know that the current 5.4 makes more peak power on a graph, but the area under the curve of the most recent 460 gives it more over all power. Yes indeed there is no replacement for displacement. Also, some free-flowing heads, exhaust, and an updated cam profile will really wake up a 460...assuming you have custom tune done for the new goodies.

On a side note, the factory 460 never was designed to see the high hp/torque figures its displacement is capably of making. You might want to beef up the bottom end and tranny a bit.

Just my two cents,
Mike
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
Hillhound's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: WV
Post

The 460 pulls harder and will get a heavy load rolling easier because it works at much lower rpm than the 5.4L. Especially in torque-460 has a very flat torque curve. Still no replacement for displacement when it comes to moving weight.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 12, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #8  
jdpollen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
That's kinda what I figured, "no replacement for displacement". I can definitely feel the power in the 5.4 in the upper rpm range, then I switch over to the 460, and I can really get moving under 2000rpm. I would love to slap on an exhaust, some headers, and possibly an updated cam, but I'm afraid with 135,000 miles on 'er, something may give (usually directly proportional to the amount it'll cost to fix). I've pulled a few trailers here and there, sometimes I completely forget they're back there. With the 5.4, I could feel the trailer back there at all times.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:21 AM
  #9  
adrianspeeder's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 27
From: Dover AFB DE / Harrisburg PA
Only 135? Just breakin it in. This older iron was built tough and is pretty forgiving. Also not near the expense of repairing the mod motors.

Adrianspeeder
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 10:01 AM
  #10  
expy03's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
From: Texas in the heart
There is simply no replacement for displacement.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #11  
pops_91710's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
I towed with a 460 for 13 years and I can tell you there is not 5.4 that can come close to how it pulled. My V10 stole my heart from the 460.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #12  
zapster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: ....I could be anywhere....
Originally Posted by pops_91710
I towed with a 460 for 13 years and I can tell you there is not 5.4 that can come close to how it pulled. My V10 stole my heart from the 460.

my 7.3L diesel did the same thing..
but as far as a gas motor goes..
460's rule..

...zap!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 PM.