Exhaust & Intake Systems
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

2.25" vs 2.5" true duals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 11:43 AM
  #16  
avfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,172
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
^ Well there you go. You have a lot of variables there. That 2v engine has a stronger torque curve to begin with. My experience has been with the same truck, and the same load.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #17  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
back in 04 when i originally dualed it- did it in 2.5, that lasted a month-dropped down to 2.25,not only did it move my tq considerably down from the 2.5" , it gained considerably , especially from the 3" siso oem, so i can say i compared aples to apples...
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 05:51 PM
  #18  
BlueOval_Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: Mountain City, North Carolina
I think the bends make a bigger difference then the size of pipe. You and your buddy might have the same truck, same motor, same headers but if the pipes are not identical it will sound different.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 12:14 AM
  #19  
andyslim007's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by openclasspro#11
back in 04 when i originally dualed it- did it in 2.5, that lasted a month-dropped down to 2.25,not only did it move my tq considerably down from the 2.5" , it gained considerably , especially from the 3" siso oem, so i can say i compared aples to apples...
When you went from 2.5 to 2.25 did ya notice any difference in sound or how loud it was?
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 05:13 AM
  #20  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
i honestly can't say i noticed a sound difference, but could feel a difference when towing-imho
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 08:07 AM
  #21  
6Jeff6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: wi
The tune will play a huge roll in how it feels also. If the truck is tuned to work with a more aggressive exhaust it will run better and be more crisp. An untuned truck with an exhaust will be good but not optimum(the tranny shifts will be sloppy, too early and weak).
An open exhaust will only hurt low low rpm. Really if you're into just gaining power for low-end then shop for a good single but you are restricted as you rev up then. It comes to what you want in sound and performance. Of course we all think we made the right decision .


Jeff
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 08:00 PM
  #22  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
my tune wasn't altered one bit from where it was with the 3"siso oem tune , was datalogged on dyno when it had 2.5 then when it had 2.25-FYI
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 09:39 PM
  #23  
6Jeff6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: wi
But if the tune was better set for one then the other it would be better??? And comparing your truck to an untuned(your words) truck is off base...


Jeff
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #24  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
i was comparing my 9000lb van to 2.5 "dualed f150- and yes i know what my ran like with 3"siso oem, 2.5 dual, then 2.25" dual which have 240k miles on it now....
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #25  
6Jeff6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: wi
Originally Posted by openclasspro#11
i tow 6lb evry weekend,when i jumop in my buddies 5.4 3v 373 scab with 2.5" duals -it can't hold a candle to my 5.4 250k 04 van with 2 valve engine-granted his truck isn't tuined -but it doesnt weigh 9klbs either
This is what I drew from.
I'm not saying you don't lose but there's way more variables that are not considered. Gears, tire size, tune, gears in tranny(yes there is differences), hell you can even say what rims(weight??) and so on.


Jeff
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 10:23 PM
  #26  
avfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,172
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
^ exactly. I just quit arguing...
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 11:29 PM
  #27  
6Jeff6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: wi
Originally Posted by avfrog
^ exactly. I just quit arguing...
Ya just want facts and not popular beliefs.


Jeff
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #28  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by andyslim007
Would there be much difference in 2.25" to 2.5 inch true duals? as far as loudness and sound go?
Hey.



Don't forget about the x-pipe.

MGD
 

Last edited by MGDfan; Sep 8, 2010 at 08:59 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 11:33 AM
  #29  
Blue07STX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Cabot, AR
Nice...
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #30  
avfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,172
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Hey.



Don't forget about the x-pipe.

MGD
I Like how that pretty picture has a BFH in it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:59 AM.