Which tune to use on a long trip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 01:38 PM
  #1  
Carolinaboy32's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 0
From: Bluffton, SC
Which tune to use on a long trip?

I have the custom 93 tune, canned tow tune, and 87 performance canned tune on my PHP Gryphon right now.

I'm driving up to Myrtle Beach with my GF for a concert on Thursday. That is going to be a good 3.5 hour drive or so.

I was wondering what tune Yall thought would be the best for economy? I think the 93 custom tune would probably be best but not sure. It's gonna be at least 2 tanks of gas for the trip probably 2.5. so would love to get some good mpgs while running interstate up there. I usually cruise around 75-80mph on the hwy just for economy reasons

I was getting 15mpg with my new wheels & tires around town.....well my commute to work 60 mile trip from 45-55mph areas. Haven't calculated it in quite sometime though

Thoughts?
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #2  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
For mine, the 87 Perf tune. That is all I ever run anymore.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 01:53 PM
  #3  
poo_'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by Bluejay
For mine, the 87 Perf tune. That is all I ever run anymore.


+1
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
Gotts2BMe's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Sask. Canada
if you are that worried about gas mileage slow down to 60-65
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:09 PM
  #5  
Carolinaboy32's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 0
From: Bluffton, SC
Originally Posted by Bluejay
For mine, the 87 Perf tune. That is all I ever run anymore.
Canned tune?
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:13 PM
  #6  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,530
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
You may get better gas mileage on the 93 tune, but your end fuel cost will be higher. Load the 87 performance tune and put it on cruise control at the speed limit or lower.

On a 200 mile trip, the time difference between 60 mph and 75 mph is only 40 minutes.......

In your case, you can take US-17 up there instead of the Interstate - sure, it's going to take longer, but you will get a lot better gas mileage *AND* save a lot of miles..........
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:19 PM
  #7  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by Carolinaboy32
Canned tune?
No, a custom 87 Perf tune from PHP. The only canned tune I have is the towing tune.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:58 PM
  #8  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by glc
You may get better gas mileage on the 93 tune, but your end fuel cost will be higher. Load the 87 performance tune and put it on cruise control at the speed limit or lower.

On a 200 mile trip, the time difference between 60 mph and 75 mph is only 40 minutes.......

In your case, you can take US-17 up there instead of the Interstate - sure, it's going to take longer, but you will get a lot better gas mileage *AND* save a lot of miles..........
I'm going to respectfully disagree with you slightly here glc. I think it is possible to get better mileage (if that is your goal) with the cruise control off. The CC WILL maintain a relatively steady speed, and that is actually a weakness in my opinion. Going downhill, it will try to keep the Torque Converter in a locked state to allow engine braking to hold the set speed. Then, as you go up hill, more gas is applied, the TC unlocks and maybe the transmission shifts down to hold that same speed.

Now, drive the same downhill/uphill combination, but this time maintain a constant throttle position with the CC off. The truck will speed up going downhill and then will use that excess speed going up the next incline, possibly "coasting down" before the top of the next rise and maybe finally unlocking the TC or downshifting if the speed drops enough.

Now, I'm not saying to actually drive like that, because the speed variation would be maddening. But, I suspect you can gain some advantage, especially in hilly terrain by leaving the CC off and taking advantage of downhill speedups.

But you're dead on with the other suggestions. 87 octane tune, speed limit or lower! (And I use the CC whenever I drive on the highway, unless the traffic makes it impractical. )

- Jack
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 08:15 AM
  #9  
Maniac01's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
From: Johnstown, PA
I have to agree on going with the 87 octane tune. It may not give you your absolute best MPG's, but the difference between 87 perf and 93 perf tunes is minimal. Plus you have to factor in that 93 costs more.

Go with the 87 tune.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 08:36 AM
  #10  
88racing's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,697
Likes: 14
From: In the fast lane from LA to Tokyo...
Just use the 87 tune and keep it UNDER the speed limit.....
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 10:47 AM
  #11  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,530
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Jack, the terrain where this trip will be done is essentially flat as a pancake. Under those conditions, cruise will probably be just as efficient.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #12  
Carolinaboy32's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 0
From: Bluffton, SC
Originally Posted by glc
Jack, the terrain where this trip will be done is essentially flat as a pancake. Under those conditions, cruise will probably be just as efficient.
Yep you've got a point about that. I always use CC

Thanks for all the advice guys

 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 12:50 PM
  #13  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by glc
Jack, the terrain where this trip will be done is essentially flat as a pancake. Under those conditions, cruise will probably be just as efficient.
And, I doubt not using CC even in hilly terrain is going to add much over 0.5 miles per gallon anyway. As I said, I ALWAYS use CC, even when towing, because I find it a pain to maintain a steady speed with my foot. When I'm towing though, I'm always "helping" it when going up hills so that the speed doesn't drop too much before the CC tries to kick in (and that prevents it from cutting off on steep hills too).

My earlier post was really triggered by one from a former member that stated using CC, "Always saves gas - proven fact!" This member and I didn't get along too well, :o so I tend to react in funny ways when I'm reminded of him.

As I said, glc, I was "respectfully disagreeing with one small point", because I respect your opinions.

- Jack
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 12:58 PM
  #14  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
And, I doubt not using CC even in hilly terrain is going to add much over 0.5 miles per gallon anyway. As I said, I ALWAYS use CC, even when towing, because I find it a pain to maintain a steady speed with my foot. When I'm towing though, I'm always "helping" it when going up hills so that the speed doesn't drop too much before the CC tries to kick in (and that prevents it from cutting off on steep hills too).

My earlier post was really triggered by one from a former member that stated using CC, "Always saves gas - proven fact!" This member and I didn't get along too well, :o so I tend to react in funny ways when I'm reminded of him.

As I said, glc, I was "respectfully disagreeing with one small point", because I respect your opinions.

- Jack
Someday, you'll get over it and forget me.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 01:03 PM
  #15  
88racing's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,697
Likes: 14
From: In the fast lane from LA to Tokyo...
Originally Posted by Bluejay
Someday, you'll get over it and forget me.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.