another tire calculation question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #16  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by i.ride.suzuki
I would agree with the error derived from the loaded radius. But the error from a squish factor is greater. And to be fair I would honestly say 3mm would be the closest you would get. 3*2*Pi = +18.85/-18.85 (37.7 Total error) Where 3% * 2500 = 75. So the loaded radius, mathematically, should get you closer than a squish factor.
Sorry, I think we're talking about two different things here. From a loaded radius, you calculate a "loaded circumferance" (actually the distance a loaded tire rolls in one revolution, at low speed). We agree there will be some error in this.

The calculator programs or the table in the Edge manual give you an "unloaded circumference" based on tire specs. There's no particular error in this other than manufacturing tolerances. I just determined that using a circumference of around 2480mm instead of the 2559mm given in the Edge table makes my speedometer and odometer accurate. The difference in the two numbers is approximately 3%, so that's where I'd start with any other tire. I worked backwards, and my technique accounts for centrifugal force at highway speeds.

- Jack
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #17  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by JeremyGSU
I tried the Bill squish method once and it threw my speedo off by a good bit. I went back and tried the calculations per the Edge book and my speedo was dead on with my GPS. I guess I'm different than everyone else here.
That's cool too Jeremy. You came up with a number that works through testing - just like I did. Bottom line, whatever works is what you want to use.

Why you DON'T apply "squish" and I do, is just one of those mysteries of life, I imagine.

- Jack
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #18  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
I calculated per the Edge instructions and was off. I did a 3% adjustment and was still off compared to GPS. I made an additional adjustment and it was right on. I did the math and it required a 5% adjustment. Now my Edge is identical to the GPS, but of course the truck speedo is off the customary 2 mph.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #19  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
I calculated per the Edge instructions and was off. I did a 3% adjustment and was still off compared to GPS. I made an additional adjustment and it was right on. I did the math and it required a 5% adjustment. Now my Edge is identical to the GPS, but of course the truck speedo is off the customary 2 mph.
It DOES look like tire size, manufacturer, construction, inflation obviously all have a bearing on this doesn't it Jim? And, what's right for one tire will not exactly match another.

So, the key is to experiment.

- Jack
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #20  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
It DOES look like tire size, manufacturer, construction, inflation obviously all have a bearing on this doesn't it Jim? And, what's right for one tire will not exactly match another.

So, the key is to experiment.

- Jack
I agree.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 AM.