VMP dyno tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #16  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
According to Brenspeed, the Steeda UDPs are the best out there for the 05+ Mustangs. But enough of talking about Mustangs, lets get back to trucks.

Originally Posted by FX4 Matt
The numbers are good but the curve is crazy looking very shaky
Most tuners run their smoothing at 5, but Justin likes to leave it at 0. Thus that's why it looks "shaky".
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #17  
hwm3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Nice, that's insane!!

I just had Justin dyno tune my car yesterday. What do you think of the ASP UDPs? I'm thinking about a set of UDPs but can't decide which brand to go with.
Will the UDPs be a problem with the Whipple?
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #18  
FX4 Matt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, Ma
aahh I got ya good numbers tho
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #19  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by ScottFF00
He has the smoothing set at 0. Which is the reason it looks this way. I asked him about it and he said thats how you likes to run them. Without any smoothing. He could change it to look smoother if he wanted.
My graphs were also done at SAE smoothing of 0, leaving a graph that's also 'shaky'. If you really want, you can take the raw data and turn the smoothing on to get a prettier graph.

Originally Posted by ScottFF00
NCSU. Justin was suprised by the richness also. Almost all aftermarket intakes will lean you out a bit. I can't explain it either. Just glad I got it back to the norm. I was running the 3.5 for about 3 months or so on the factory tune.
You ran 3 months with a 3.5" AF1 with nothing but the stock tune?? You have more ***** than I do!

Any chance of getting a larger version of your dyno chart?

- NCSU
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #20  
ScottFF00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Yeah. I'll see if I can set it up in my gallery tomorrow when I get home from work.

I should be doing my Flex-a-lite 270 fan install in the next month or so depending on when the controller comes in. Then switching over to a a x-pipe and 2 18" magnaflow.

I'll put it back on the dyno and see what those 2 mods yeild.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #21  
black07screw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
for just those mods you by faaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrr have the best numbers of anyone I have seen. thats about the torque #s stock harleys with superchargers put down b4 a tune in stuff. I wish I could put down those numbers, anything special you did. Your probably about 30-35 ft/lbs ahead of every one else with those mods on a 93 tune.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 02:35 AM
  #22  
05HarleySD4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Great numbers, just out of curiosity, how many hours was the truck on the Dyno?
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 04:49 AM
  #23  
ScottFF00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
1-2 hours on the dyno. I tried to resize it. Is it any easier to read now?
 

Last edited by ScottFF00; Feb 22, 2008 at 04:55 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 04:55 AM
  #24  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Scott I see on your list of mods that you have the cat's cut out! Do you have all four cut off or just the rear two? That maybe one reason why he laid done such good number's!
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:01 AM
  #25  
ScottFF00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
My '06 only had 2 cats. I had a local exhuast shop just cut them out and replace with 2 1/4 pipe and weld it back up. I disconnected the 02's and had Justin turn the rear sensors off in the tune.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:06 AM
  #26  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Did you notice much of a difference in power after removing the cat's? I think i'll be making a trip to the muffler shop soon! That banana cracks me up! LoL
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:16 AM
  #27  
ScottFF00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Without the cats the exhaust is raspy as hell. I'm going to be switching over to a X crossover and true duals. I hope to quiet it down alittle.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 09:39 AM
  #28  
JeremyGSU's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Are those numbers SAE corrected?
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #29  
i.ride.suzuki's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JeremyGSU
Are those numbers SAE corrected?
Did you not look close enough at the graph and see SAE .97
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 10:30 PM
  #30  
Justin@VMP's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
I was very suprised too, Scott did tell me there were a few gallons of 93 in it from when he topped off the tank, so that may have helped me run a little more timing and allow the KS to add in a little more.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.