2009 - 2014 F-150

Out with the old, in with the new

Old Mar 27, 2011 | 05:42 PM
  #16  
Moosenuckle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by KingRanchCoy
I like the 02 better , Congrats on the new truck
Nice comment, moodkill

Sweet truck. Sweet color! That leather looks amazing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 06:17 PM
  #17  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by Moosenuckle
Nice comment, moodkill

Sweet truck. Sweet color! That leather looks amazing.
Just stating my opinion, i did tell him congrats on the new truck
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 12:20 PM
  #18  
mikeyss's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 1
From: Longmont, CO
I notice you live in Denver, does the ecoboost seem affected by the high altitude? I drive a 99 F150 w/5.4 and moved close to Denver from PA. The first thing I noticed was the power lose from being 5k above sea level. I also was getting 18mpg in PA (truck is not stock) but living in the Denver area I barely get 15mpg. I wonder if the ecoboost, 5.0, and 6.2 will experience this type of power and fuel mileage loss.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #19  
bddo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, GA
Congrats! Great lookin truck!! Enjoy.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 01:13 PM
  #20  
TX Chris's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
Originally Posted by mikeyss
I notice you live in Denver, does the ecoboost seem affected by the high altitude? I drive a 99 F150 w/5.4 and moved close to Denver from PA. The first thing I noticed was the power lose from being 5k above sea level. I also was getting 18mpg in PA (truck is not stock) but living in the Denver area I barely get 15mpg. I wonder if the ecoboost, 5.0, and 6.2 will experience this type of power and fuel mileage loss.
Turbo motors typically excel in the higher altitudes...

Pasted from an online article after a simple Google search:

The high-altitude performance of a turbocharged engine is significantly better. Because of the lower air pressure at high altitudes, the power loss of a naturally aspirated engine is considerable. In contrast, the performance of the turbine improves at altitude as a result of the greater pressure difference between the virtually constant pressure upstream of the turbine and the lower ambient pressure at outlet. The lower air density at the compressor inlet is largely equalized. Hence, the engine has barely any power loss.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #21  
stein78's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Naperville, IL
I wish I never clicked on this thread....that's exactly what I want!

Enjoy the new truck!
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 04:16 PM
  #22  
ConvertedMan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Milton, GA
I was going to have to spend some $$$ (that's what I told the wife).


I am glad you added that last part in there! I was starting to think you were going to tell us the same line you told your wife!

Nice truck
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 05:00 PM
  #23  
firstimeFord's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by mikeyss
I notice you live in Denver, does the ecoboost seem affected by the high altitude? I drive a 99 F150 w/5.4 and moved close to Denver from PA. The first thing I noticed was the power lose from being 5k above sea level. I also was getting 18mpg in PA (truck is not stock) but living in the Denver area I barely get 15mpg. I wonder if the ecoboost, 5.0, and 6.2 will experience this type of power and fuel mileage loss.
Ecoboost seems the same powerwise in Denver as it did in Omaha. Quite the opposite with the 2002, when I got to Omaha it felt more powerful than usual, almost got cold feet and turned around and went home without the new truck
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM.