2009 - 2014 F-150

Finally drove the 6.2L... WAY better than EB or 5.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #1  
Cub Cadet's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Finally drove the 6.2L... WAY better than EB or 5.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I finally got to test drive a Lariat supercrew with the 6.2L engine.... WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW..... FINALLY They got it right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is the engine to have!!!!! We had our 2010 Taurus in for service and they gave us a 2011 loaner for the day. I put that truck through its paces and it was the very best Ford engine that I have ever experienced in a regular F150. This blew the POS 5.4 3V engine out of the water with ease since that thing is garbage. This also was better than the 5.4 2V that I compare everything to. Also, this was FAR better than the Ecoboost and the 5L. This has MUCH more torque and power... vastly better for daily driving AND towing/hauling. Absolutely fantastic. I am working on my order for a new one right away even though it has the AWFUL blond wood interior and the crappy sound system that Ford uses now. Why can't they bring back the Audiophile that I had in my 2005 King Ranch????? I am trading in my 2010 Cadillac CTS-V 6spd manual, plus my 2000 Mustang GT to get this truck. Absolutely PHENOMENAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 08:40 PM
  #2  
FX4life's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Truck of the Month
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
From: High Plains of West Texas
Sweet! The only downfall of the 6.2 is the mpgs, but it is a beast for sure! I liked it and the EB well over the 5.0. I like the modability of the 6.2 over the EB plus it's all I can get in a raptor!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #3  
NASSTY's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: ME
Originally Posted by FX4life
Sweet! The only downfall of the 6.2 is the mpgs, but it is a beast for sure! I liked it and the EB well over the 5.0. I like the modability of the 6.2 over the EB plus it's all I can get in a raptor!
The Ecoboost (being forced induction) would respond to mods way better. But since they are being so **** about voiding the warranty for any mods.It will probably be a while before we see any modded Ecoboosts.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 09:19 PM
  #4  
Svets96's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Good to hear. I'm still waitin to test drive a 6.2, but none are at dealerships in my area yet.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 09:25 PM
  #5  
FX4life's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Truck of the Month
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
From: High Plains of West Texas
Originally Posted by NASSTY
The Ecoboost (being forced induction) would respond to mods way better. But since they are being so **** about voiding the warranty for any mods.It will probably be a while before we see any modded Ecoboosts.
That warranty garbage is why I preferred the 6.2/5.0 modability (not saying I would get away with things but there seems to be more leniency on those two for certain things), at least for the moment. I'll let someone else be the guinea pig modding an EB no doubt the results will be impressive like you mentioned!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
barry1me's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MI
Glad you like it. Its a beast of a motor. I only drove a raptor with a 6.2L, the exhaust sounds awesome. For me I couldnt justify a 10mpg truck.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #7  
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: north Texas
Originally Posted by Cub Cadet
I finally got to test drive a Lariat supercrew with the 6.2L engine.... WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW..... FINALLY They got it right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is the engine to have!!!!! We had our 2010 Taurus in for service and they gave us a 2011 loaner for the day. I put that truck through its paces and it was the very best Ford engine that I have ever experienced in a regular F150. This blew the POS 5.4 3V engine out of the water with ease since that thing is garbage. This also was better than the 5.4 2V that I compare everything to. Also, this was FAR better than the Ecoboost and the 5L. This has MUCH more torque and power... vastly better for daily driving AND towing/hauling. Absolutely fantastic. I am working on my order for a new one right away even though it has the AWFUL blond wood interior and the crappy sound system that Ford uses now. Why can't they bring back the Audiophile that I had in my 2005 King Ranch????? I am trading in my 2010 Cadillac CTS-V 6spd manual, plus my 2000 Mustang GT to get this truck. Absolutely PHENOMENAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So you have hauled and towed with both and the 6.2 leaves the ecoboost in the dust?

Tell us what you hauled and or towed. Weight, terrain, etc

Also give us the fuel mileage for the ecoboost v.s. the 6.2 both loaded and unloaded.

Have you driven an ecoboost for a whole day? Have you towed with one?

That's what I thought.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
So let me get this straight. You pay more to get the 6.2, and you pay more for gas to run the 6.2. Sounds worse to me.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:04 PM
  #9  
KazK's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge
Originally Posted by Stealth
So let me get this straight. You pay more to get the 6.2, and you pay more for gas to run the 6.2. Sounds worse to me.
BUT BRO YOU GET THAT EXHAUST NOTE YOU WOULDN'T HEAR FROM A V6 TT



I've driven neither and I don't want to because I'll prob end up with the Ecoboost due to driving 90% highway.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #10  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by KazK
BUT BRO YOU GET THAT EXHAUST NOTE YOU WOULDN'T HEAR FROM A V6 TT



I've driven neither and I don't want to because I'll prob end up with the Ecoboost due to driving 90% highway.
I like turbo whine as well as v8 muscle. I'm a diverse gearhead.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:26 PM
  #11  
Loki 5.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Stealth
So let me get this straight. You pay more to get the 6.2, and you pay more for gas to run the 6.2. Sounds worse to me.
And you get beat by both at the stoplight /1/8mi.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #12  
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
1/8th will all come down to reaction time on the street anyway.

I'll be getting a EB cause they're making me.(FX4) But despite all the EB advantages, if I could, I'd get a 6.2L.

But I don't get the choice.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:37 PM
  #13  
Gerrard155's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
The 6.2 is a good engine, for sure, but to say it is infinitely superior to anything else you can get in an f150 is just ignorant. Each of the motors you can get in a f150 have their merits and demerits. The 6.2 is powerful, has a great sound, and will appeal to most traditionalists. But you pay for that, on both ends, in the form of a $2K premium to start and also at the pump for the life of the vehicle. The Ecoboost provides good power and a great curve, as well as excellent fuel economy. But comes with the love it/hate it sound of a turboed 6, as well as possible reliability issues down the road due to using an unproven setup. The 5.0 provides good power, decent fuel economy, as well as an excellent exhaust note. It is, however, the weakest of the 3 2011 engines mentioned here, so it will not appeal to all of the truck buyers out there. Even the 5.4, which I am not a huge fan of, has its merits. I would be willing to bet you can get a 2010 comparably equipped with the 5.4 and spend at least $10K less on it between incentives and the original difference in price. So its all about what you put a priority on as a truck buyer, and that will dictate what you will purchase. I am glad you like the 6.2, and it is a beast, but not everyone is willing to pay the premium to drive a truck with that motor. Plus, I am pretty sure I would completely disregard the opinion of someone who would trade in a CTS-V anyway. That is one of the greatest cars of our generation, what the hell are you thinking?!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:52 PM
  #14  
Drdudsads
Guest
Posts: n/a
333
 

Last edited by Drdudsads; Jun 22, 2011 at 01:19 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 12:15 AM
  #15  
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
The important part is we FINALLY have some options with some real motivation here.

The last time Ford was leading in half ton hp/tq was......... 1993? (Hmm only 18 years)

Why not have the best chassis and the most power? Not a bad thing is it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.