2009 - 2014 F-150

36 Gallon Tank in the Ecoboost Std on 4X4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #1  
jpetre's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Thumbs up 36 Gallon Tank in the Ecoboost Std on 4X4

OK, guys from the horses mouth, I was on the test drive and the young lady told me I was going to get the 36 gallon tank on my 4X4 Platinum ecoboost. I told her that I was told it couldn't be ordered with the 36 gallon tank. This seems to have changed now! WOO HOO! See note below as I asked my dealer to speak with the regional sales manager as my truck was ordered back in Oct but he was only able to get the 26 Gallon tank, there was no 36 Gallon option. This was his response today.

"Ok sorry about the delay on getting back to you. I wanted to make sure we had the right information. You are correct in the 4x4 has the 36 gal tank which is now standard. They updated the order guides after we already ordered yours. Also Joe was telling me you wanted to see about changing the ext. color is that correct? "

As far as color I think I will stick with White, I was interested in the silver but just wasn't sure.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
EdCaffreyMS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Great Falls, Montana
Thanks for posting this! I'm planning on going into my local dealership in the morning and ordering my new rig.....although it won't make much of a difference as to whether I order or not, it's good to now information.

I just got off the phone with the saleman I'm working with, and he says he will check it for me and verify in the morning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
Ford850's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Interesting. I wonder if this is for all 4x4s or just the Platinum.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 05:40 PM
  #4  
jpetre's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Ford850
Interesting. I wonder if this is for all 4x4s or just the Platinum.
The lady that originally told me this was saying it was the default tank on all 4X4 ecoboost trucks. She did say it had to do with overall lenght of the truck though. She also said it would be an option on the 4X2 trucks as well as long as there was enough room for the larger tank.
 

Last edited by jpetre; Jan 14, 2011 at 05:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
bluegreenf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Great news!!! 600 to 900 miles per tank is much more than anyone is getting now between fill ups.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 06:44 PM
  #6  
kwb2004's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
I sure hope that this is true!

Kevin
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 08:18 PM
  #7  
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: north Texas
Originally Posted by jpetre
The lady that originally told me this was saying it was the default tank on all 4X4 ecoboost trucks. She did say it had to do with overall lenght of the truck though. She also said it would be an option on the 4X2 trucks as well as long as there was enough room for the larger tank.
I heard several months ago that a guy ordered it with the 8' bed. How long is your bed?
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 14, 2011 | 09:55 PM
  #8  
CometFlash's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
From: MA
Thumbs up Good choice if true!

That's a good decision on their part for sure; most likely because the EB came back with such poor MPG numbers, they realized at this point it would make virtually no difference and that the bigger tank would at least make some goodwill with those who might be considering the EB engine vs the 5.0 (with the 5.o having near identical MPG AND the 36 tank, compared to the EB with small tank before).
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 10:34 PM
  #9  
jpetre's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
I heard several months ago that a guy ordered it with the 8' bed. How long is your bed?
Standard 5.5 foot bed super crew
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #10  
bluegreenf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
I'm so tired of people saying the fuel economy is so poor. ANYTHING in the 20's for mpg is EXCELLENT. I guess because now it does have the larger tank, you needed to be let down with the fuel economy.

 

Last edited by bluegreenf150; Jan 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2011 | 11:58 PM
  #11  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by CometFlash
That's a good decision on their part for sure; most likely because the EB came back with such poor MPG numbers, they realized at this point it would make virtually no difference and that the bigger tank would at least make some goodwill with those who might be considering the EB engine vs the 5.0 (with the 5.o having near identical MPG AND the 36 tank, compared to the EB with small tank before).
Poor MPG numbers?
An epa expected hwy range of 19-26mpg is 'poor'?

 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 12:00 AM
  #12  
TX Chris's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
Originally Posted by CometFlash
That's a good decision on their part for sure; most likely because the EB came back with such poor MPG numbers, they realized at this point it would make virtually no difference and that the bigger tank would at least make some goodwill with those who might be considering the EB engine vs the 5.0 (with the 5.o having near identical MPG AND the 36 tank, compared to the EB with small tank before).
Like the guys above me said - I do hope you're implying "poor" numbers with regards to the hype vs. actual numbers.

If I can achieve 23 or better on the highway in a crew cab truck with 420 ft-lbs on tap, I'm a happy camper.

I've said it in other threads, but my current Ranger with the 4.0 averages 17 mpg with mixed driving. Worst tank was 14.5, best was just over 19. Bring on the "poor" mileage of the EB!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 06:33 AM
  #13  
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
What's the big deal about the tank size? When the 36 gal tank is full, you are hauling more weight - not good for performance or mpg. And I suspect most gas stations will not support the $'s needed to fill it because of the maximum $ approval ( at least the stations I use in my area - $75 max per approval and one only allows a credit card use once per day). I am perfectly fine with my "little" tank.
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 07:45 AM
  #14  
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 1
From: minnesota - ubetcha
Originally Posted by Jus Cruisin
What's the big deal about the tank size? When the 36 gal tank is full, you are hauling more weight - not good for performance or mpg. And I suspect most gas stations will not support the $'s needed to fill it because of the maximum $ approval ( at least the stations I use in my area - $75 max per approval and one only allows a credit card use once per day). I am perfectly fine with my "little" tank.
Get out the ghetto...

Many would not run it empty and totally fill it unless towing long distances. 22x36 = almost 800 miles range on hwy... 11 x 36 = under 400 miles range towing which would be great. And you could use trucking in field and hunting all day after driving there w/o worrying about gas now.
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 07:58 AM
  #15  
Jerry-rigged's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Coastal Tx
Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
Get out the ghetto...

Many would not run it empty and totally fill it unless towing long distances. 22x36 = almost 800 miles range on hwy... 11 x 36 = under 400 miles range towing which would be great. And you could use trucking in field and hunting all day after driving there w/o worrying about gas now.
I know I would. I have a long daily commute, and my current civic gets 300 miles a tank (30mpg) - I have to fill up about 3 times every 2 weeks. If I could swap that for once every 2 weeks, I would be a very happy camper.

My commute - about 85 miles/day ~ 500 miles a week, assuming I don't go out to lunch, or make any side trips on the way home...

Edit - also - 35 gallons * $3 a gallon = $105 Most stations in my area cut off at $125, so I am fine there too...
Jerry
 

Last edited by Jerry-rigged; Jan 15, 2011 at 08:01 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.