More spy photos of the new 150
#16
Originally Posted by n8er00
I don't want to make any waves either but the former Heritage design was actually designed for women in mind. True story. The thought was, the Ford marketing department felt that if they appealed to women with a design that they would appreciate more, then it would eventually sell more trucks. The reason for this is that in a typical household (not mine but...) the wife is the main budgeter of the income, so therefore, you get her on your side and the men will follow. Unfortunately, a lot of people agreed that the truck looked too "feminine" which is the reason for the turnaround in the latest generation to make it bigger and more boxy. A good choice in my opinion.
#17
#18
Originally Posted by 02XLT4X4
The front end isn't bad but small windows and huge bed really does nothing for me on the F-150. I can see having it on the Supercrew, but a extended cab or standard cab really doesn't need it the extra capacity. If you need more height they make these funny little holes in the bed called stake pockets.
#19
#20
Originally Posted by Rambo
You aren't the only customer. In fact you aren't one. The higher sides are good for many people, i.e. me. They allow for a tonneau cover to be used on the truck and at the same time load taller items. They also allow for more space in the bed overall. It really isn't bad at all, and with the steps it will be perfect.
#21
Originally Posted by Rambo
You aren't the only customer. In fact you aren't one. The higher sides are good for many people, i.e. me. They allow for a tonneau cover to be used on the truck and at the same time load taller items. They also allow for more space in the bed overall. It really isn't bad at all, and with the steps it will be perfect.
#22
I'm 6'5", a "serious" truck user and I think the extra height sucks.
One might argue that people running tonneau covers aren't "serious" truck users. You can't load and haul anything with a cover in place that you can't haul in an old Ranchero or El Camino.
The extra 2" in height and 6" in length gain you nothing unless you haul something like gravel or mulch year round.
With my height, I can still load and unload some things over the side with a little difficulty. It just makes for a bunch of nasty scratches that I have to buff out when my shorter buddies are trying to do the same thing.
Ever tried strapping an ATV to the tiedowns while standing in the bed with it loaded because you can't reach over the sides?
One might argue that people running tonneau covers aren't "serious" truck users. You can't load and haul anything with a cover in place that you can't haul in an old Ranchero or El Camino.
The extra 2" in height and 6" in length gain you nothing unless you haul something like gravel or mulch year round.
With my height, I can still load and unload some things over the side with a little difficulty. It just makes for a bunch of nasty scratches that I have to buff out when my shorter buddies are trying to do the same thing.
Ever tried strapping an ATV to the tiedowns while standing in the bed with it loaded because you can't reach over the sides?
#23
Originally Posted by quackrstackr
I'm 6'5", a "serious" truck user and I think the extra height sucks.
One might argue that people running tonneau covers aren't "serious" truck users. You can't load and haul anything with a cover in place that you can't haul in an old Ranchero or El Camino.
One might argue that people running tonneau covers aren't "serious" truck users. You can't load and haul anything with a cover in place that you can't haul in an old Ranchero or El Camino.
#24
Originally Posted by fordmantpw
I have a soft tonneau...I can put anything in mine you can in yours with a 15 second roll-up of the tonneau. My "serious" truck use consists of towing my 27' travel trailer. I haul quite a bit of camping gear, concealed under my tonneau, when on a trip. That extra bit of height comes in really handy for me.
Originally Posted by quackrstackr
I'm 6'5", a "serious" truck user and I think the extra height sucks.
I'm 6'5", a "serious" truck user and I think the extra height sucks.
#25
Originally Posted by Rambo
That's fine, but it is 2007, not 1987. You shouldn't have to compromise a truck's ability just because some folks think it isn't user friendly.
Following that logic, they may as well do away with the truck bed and make it a van.
You can also flip that and say it should be user friendly in lieu of people wanting an extra two inches to squeeze a table saw under a tonneau cover. I would imagine there are a lot more people trying to load over the sides day in and day out than there are with the cover scenario.
That's what they make SUV's for.
#26
Originally Posted by quackrstackr
Following that logic, they may as well do away with the truck bed and make it a van. You can also flip that and say it should be user friendly in lieu of people wanting an extra two inches to squeeze a table saw under a tonneau cover. I would imagine there are a lot more people trying to load over the sides day in and day out than there are with the cover scenario. That's what they make SUV's for.
Ford engineers do this thing where they, like, talk to people that buy their trucks, and based on what they say, they add features to their trucks.
Whazzit called again?
Market research?
Some people don't like the deeper bed, but you can be sure that a lot more people like it. They just don't feel obligated to come onto a message board and continually tell people how much they like their truck. Lastly, most people load from the rear with the tailgate down; and on the new truck there will be side steps as well as rear steps. Problem solved.
#27
Originally Posted by Rambo
just because some folks think it isn't user friendly.
Originally Posted by Rambo
Whazzit called again?
Market research?
Market research?
Ford engineers do not do "market research".
I am in the industry and do design work on this stuff for a living. If a lot of the internet experts such as yourself knew half of what you were talking about, you might be dangerous.
#28
Originally Posted by quackrstackr
Quite the company Kool Aid drinker, aren't you?
Ford engineers do not do "market research".
I am in the industry and do design work on this stuff for a living. If a lot of the internet experts such as yourself knew half of what you were talking about, you might be dangerous.
Ford engineers do not do "market research".
I am in the industry and do design work on this stuff for a living. If a lot of the internet experts such as yourself knew half of what you were talking about, you might be dangerous.
talk about a kool-aid drinker. Most companies DO market research. What company you work for? gm? That I could understand. I love the higher sides on my truck. I do believe most here do. You don't, and that is fine. Your shorter friends would scratch any truck trying to go over the side. Short is short dude.
#29
Originally Posted by chris1450
talk about a kool-aid drinker. Most companies DO market research. What company you work for? gm? That I could understand. I love the higher sides on my truck. I do believe most here do. You don't, and that is fine. Your shorter friends would scratch any truck trying to go over the side. Short is short dude.
Not everyone likes the taller sides...there has been several complaints on this forum. I like them, you like them...that's fine. But if I were lifting items over the sides of my truck regularly, I could see where it would be a hassle. I don't as most everything I load goes in the back with the tailgate down.
Now-a-days, it's all about numbers to sell trucks, and if your bed has more volume, you can say you can hold the most (in volume). That gets the public's attention and it may sell a few more trucks. That's what it is all about folks.
#30