2009 - 2014 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Exclusive Spy Video! 2009 Ford F-150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-21-2007, 05:44 PM
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Home of Crown Royal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't believe we'll see the all new 09 in only @ 6.5 months!!!! Can hardly wait.
Now lets all chant:
"6.2 we need u, 6.2 we need u" and
"A diesels fine if the price is in line, a diesels fine if the price is in line".
 
  #17  
Old 06-21-2007, 09:51 PM
texaspyro21's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lubbock or Houston
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to agree with others that the dash is probably a fake. However, Topleft corner 3 buttons are info center, top right has emgency flashers and possible rear window defroster.

Ill add more as I figure them out.
 
  #18  
Old 06-22-2007, 08:47 AM
wasachevyguy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think it looks awful. i may have to change my name to "amachevyguyagain"
 
  #19  
Old 06-22-2007, 09:32 AM
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Waco/Houston
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just wonder if the 6.2's are a larger version then the 5.4's....
 
  #20  
Old 06-22-2007, 09:39 AM
ManualF150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vernon, NY
Posts: 10,625
Received 259 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
I just wonder if the 6.2's are a larger version then the 5.4's....
Good question... I've noticed that with Ford... they like to use the same engines but just do crazy stuff with them rather than just creating a new engine. Like the Duratec... you've got the Duratec 2.5 and the Duratec 3.0. Pretty much the same engine, just some displacement differences... so I wouldn't put it past them.
 
  #21  
Old 06-22-2007, 10:09 AM
MACH1_69's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunny S FL
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It looks like a Escape center stack. You can see above the 2 sets of three buttons, the dark recessed area, that has a glossy lens look to it. That's that display "Message Center" for the vehicle, Radio display, and probably climate control display info.

When Ford does stuff new and "advanced", it tends to carry over to other design teams on other vehicles.

But I do agree that the upper part of the dash seems pieced together. The overhang seems to be a bit much.
 
  #22  
Old 06-22-2007, 10:41 AM
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Home of Crown Royal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no way the 6.2 is a larger 5.4. Not enought room between cylinders for increased bore. Would have to be all longer stroke, and these engines are already very tall. This is why they just added 2 cylinders and made a V10 for larger applications as opposed to making it a V8 back in 98.
 
  #23  
Old 06-22-2007, 10:54 AM
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wasachevyguy
i think it looks awful. i may have to change my name to "amachevyguyagain"

Okay Bye!
 
  #24  
Old 06-22-2007, 04:17 PM
MrSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wasachevyguy
i think it looks awful. i may have to change my name to "amachevyguyagain"
umm.... why?

that new silverado is ugly as sin

just change it to "amatundraguy"
LOL
 
  #25  
Old 06-22-2007, 04:19 PM
MrSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
I just wonder if the 6.2's are a larger version then the 5.4's....
it is based on the mods but is a new engine design that is different from the 5.4 and 4.6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Boss_engine
 
  #26  
Old 06-22-2007, 07:16 PM
CometFlash's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
assumption - dash

When you say awful, are you referring to the dash or the exterior? because you can't see jack of the exterior yet. But I agree with the dash. But I am keeping in mind this is just another test mule and the end results could (and hopefully will) be much cleaner and refined. Besides, there still doesn't seem to be placement for the NAV on this mule, so even if this does go into production, it may be only on the trucks without the NAV option. And I certainly wouldn't ever buy another vehicle without NAV, it would be like having a vehicle without EATC. Could you imagine it? Ack.

Now hopefully, we'll continue to get little snippets from Screwbuilder and rambunctious to whet our appetites until Ford unveils more itself. Long as they don't get in trouble and it keeps us excited, it's all good.
 
  #27  
Old 06-28-2007, 10:30 PM
chris1450's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: western washington
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CometFlash
They were right about that bizarre interior. I can't imagine it's close to the real thing, not only does it seem to have redundancy, but there is also no room for a screen for NAV.

Nav is for people who can't find there way around. Who needs it The most useless feature I can think of on a vehicle.Total fluff or bling
 
  #28  
Old 06-28-2007, 11:10 PM
CometFlash's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps for some people you are correct.

My job as a Training Manager requires me to travel to different stores in MA and CT. Having my portable Garmin GPS is nice in my '04, but I'd much rather have it factory option. Clean install, always there when you need it.

It certainly makes me feel better having that GPS when I'm in unfamiliar territory!
 
  #29  
Old 08-11-2007, 06:30 AM
songkrai's Avatar
Multiple Usernames
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GMC/Chevrolet both have two different dash options.

Sounds like a good idea expcept to get the 6-disk changer, one has to go to the upscale dash. To get the upscale dash one has to purchase a much more expensive truck. In theory good, in practicality, it really stinks.

Any of the base line GMC/Chevrolet do not offer the 6-disk changer. Ford does now. I hope Ford does not go in this direction.
 
  #30  
Old 08-11-2007, 12:43 PM
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i like it when GM guys say the ford interior is below the GM in quality. IF you compare the different levels, still theyre wrong i believe. Look at the bench seat ford to bench seat chevy radio and center console area.


Ford :

Chevy :


It just looks better quality,i still think the chevy interior is nice because i like the truck all around, but fords just looks higher quality for the bench seat.


Center 2 front seat setup

Ford :


Chevy :


Ford definitly wins in this one..
 


Quick Reply: Exclusive Spy Video! 2009 Ford F-150



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 PM.