2009 - 2014 F-150

Exclusive Spy Video! 2009 Ford F-150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 05:44 PM
  #16  
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
Can't believe we'll see the all new 09 in only @ 6.5 months!!!! Can hardly wait.
Now lets all chant:
"6.2 we need u, 6.2 we need u" and
"A diesels fine if the price is in line, a diesels fine if the price is in line".
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #17  
texaspyro21's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock or Houston
I have to agree with others that the dash is probably a fake. However, Topleft corner 3 buttons are info center, top right has emgency flashers and possible rear window defroster.

Ill add more as I figure them out.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #18  
wasachevyguy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: British Columbia
i think it looks awful. i may have to change my name to "amachevyguyagain"
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #19  
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: Waco/Houston
I just wonder if the 6.2's are a larger version then the 5.4's....
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #20  
ManualF150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,636
Likes: 264
From: Vernon, NY
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
I just wonder if the 6.2's are a larger version then the 5.4's....
Good question... I've noticed that with Ford... they like to use the same engines but just do crazy stuff with them rather than just creating a new engine. Like the Duratec... you've got the Duratec 2.5 and the Duratec 3.0. Pretty much the same engine, just some displacement differences... so I wouldn't put it past them.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #21  
MACH1_69's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 1
From: Sunny S FL
It looks like a Escape center stack. You can see above the 2 sets of three buttons, the dark recessed area, that has a glossy lens look to it. That's that display "Message Center" for the vehicle, Radio display, and probably climate control display info.

When Ford does stuff new and "advanced", it tends to carry over to other design teams on other vehicles.

But I do agree that the upper part of the dash seems pieced together. The overhang seems to be a bit much.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #22  
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
There is no way the 6.2 is a larger 5.4. Not enought room between cylinders for increased bore. Would have to be all longer stroke, and these engines are already very tall. This is why they just added 2 cylinders and made a V10 for larger applications as opposed to making it a V8 back in 98.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #23  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by wasachevyguy
i think it looks awful. i may have to change my name to "amachevyguyagain"

Okay Bye!
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #24  
MrSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by wasachevyguy
i think it looks awful. i may have to change my name to "amachevyguyagain"
umm.... why?

that new silverado is ugly as sin

just change it to "amatundraguy"
LOL
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #25  
MrSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
I just wonder if the 6.2's are a larger version then the 5.4's....
it is based on the mods but is a new engine design that is different from the 5.4 and 4.6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Boss_engine
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #26  
CometFlash's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
From: MA
assumption - dash

When you say awful, are you referring to the dash or the exterior? because you can't see jack of the exterior yet. But I agree with the dash. But I am keeping in mind this is just another test mule and the end results could (and hopefully will) be much cleaner and refined. Besides, there still doesn't seem to be placement for the NAV on this mule, so even if this does go into production, it may be only on the trucks without the NAV option. And I certainly wouldn't ever buy another vehicle without NAV, it would be like having a vehicle without EATC. Could you imagine it? Ack.

Now hopefully, we'll continue to get little snippets from Screwbuilder and rambunctious to whet our appetites until Ford unveils more itself. Long as they don't get in trouble and it keeps us excited, it's all good.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #27  
chris1450's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 774
Likes: 1
From: western washington
Originally Posted by CometFlash
They were right about that bizarre interior. I can't imagine it's close to the real thing, not only does it seem to have redundancy, but there is also no room for a screen for NAV.

Nav is for people who can't find there way around. Who needs it The most useless feature I can think of on a vehicle.Total fluff or bling
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2007 | 11:10 PM
  #28  
CometFlash's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
From: MA
Perhaps for some people you are correct.

My job as a Training Manager requires me to travel to different stores in MA and CT. Having my portable Garmin GPS is nice in my '04, but I'd much rather have it factory option. Clean install, always there when you need it.

It certainly makes me feel better having that GPS when I'm in unfamiliar territory!
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #29  
songkrai's Avatar
Multiple Usernames
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
GMC/Chevrolet both have two different dash options.

Sounds like a good idea expcept to get the 6-disk changer, one has to go to the upscale dash. To get the upscale dash one has to purchase a much more expensive truck. In theory good, in practicality, it really stinks.

Any of the base line GMC/Chevrolet do not offer the 6-disk changer. Ford does now. I hope Ford does not go in this direction.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #30  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
i like it when GM guys say the ford interior is below the GM in quality. IF you compare the different levels, still theyre wrong i believe. Look at the bench seat ford to bench seat chevy radio and center console area.


Ford :

Chevy :


It just looks better quality,i still think the chevy interior is nice because i like the truck all around, but fords just looks higher quality for the bench seat.


Center 2 front seat setup

Ford :


Chevy :


Ford definitly wins in this one..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.