2009 - 2014 F-150

Poll - Engine choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #16  
F151's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
I choose #5- all of the above. Because we all need choices........
Personally never had a diesel, but might try one in an F150.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
Bruce R Leech's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: south Baja Mexico
I guess the diesel

but I would realy like to see a 6 liter in line 6 cyl gasoline with cross flow heads and maybe double over head cams and a turbo option. and sense this is going to be a Farley low RPM motor a 8 speed trainsmition with 1st being a Granny of 6.0/1 and both 7 and 8th being OD with .75/1 and .55/1


this would be my dream come true


Bruce
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2007 | 01:02 AM
  #18  
Ron_b's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 4xford1
6.2 or nothing at all!
X2
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #19  
Ilovemyford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
4.4L diesel
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #20  
nigdonht's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Owensboro, KY
4.4L Diesel, diesel is cheaper, and it would be cool to have a diesel in a 1/2 Ton truck
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 04:09 AM
  #21  
Adam Walker's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Hernando Ms.
Originally Posted by nigdonht
4.4L Diesel, diesel is cheaper, and it would be cool to have a diesel in a 1/2 Ton truck
it would be cool to have a diesel in a 1/2 Ton truck, I would have to have it
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 09:02 AM
  #22  
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 3
From: Linn, MO
Originally Posted by nigdonht
...diesel is cheaper...
For now!

I want a diesel F150 as well, but I'm guessing diesel will be back up above gas in price again. Around here, it is always higher than gas in the winter.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #23  
pldjr0187's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: MA
#4 for sure
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #24  
nightranger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
Talking 6.2 Ltr.

I want to be able to pull with the big boys, look good and be bad FAST.. make 4:33 posi an option on mine...I want it in dark blue trimmed in arizona beige...
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #25  
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
6.2L!! if it really belts out 425HP/450TRQ stock, imagine the possibilities when Troyer gets a hold of it!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #26  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by mSaLL150
6.2L!! if it really belts out 425HP/450TRQ stock, imagine the possibilities when Troyer gets a hold of it!!
or any other tuning company...
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 08:55 PM
  #27  
GerRod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
The Boss engine will reportedly displace 6.2 L (379 in³, 6208 cc) upon introduction, with the ability to exceed 7.0 L in future applications, and produce more than 425 hp (317 kW) and 425 ft·lbf (576 N·m).
I think everybody is misinterpreting the output of the Boss 6.2 engine. I think they're saying the 6.2 L can be increased (by boring or stroking) to a 7.0 L in future applications which can produce more than 425 hp and 425 ftlbs of torque. It's the 7.0 L not 6.2 L.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #28  
dbhost's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 2
From: League City, Texas
I will have to pick a Diesel any day over a gasser. If I could have afforded a Super Duty PSD, I would not be driving an F150. Not that I need the stump pulling ability of a Super Duty, even that is a good thing, but fuel availability in an emergency situation. Simply put, during the Hurricane Rita evacuation, I was stuck in Lufkin TX because I couldn't get gasoline to get back home. They couldn't hardly give the Diesel away...

And top that off with improved MPG, better drivetrain durability etc...

I absolutely love my F150, but if they offered a similar truck with a Diesel that I could afford, and had similar performance characteristics, I would gladly trade my gasser in...
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #29  
gators241987's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Germantown, TN
id be curious to see how the 6.2 would work in these trucks. just think if they made an even bigger size
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.