2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

IFS on 40's ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:28 PM
  #1  
patshea098's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 0
From: Braselton, Georgia
IFS on 40's ?

i know how yall all were saying that its a real bad idea to put 40" tires on the IFS of our truck. but the chevy 2500 is IFS look at this bad boy http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2006-...QQcmdZViewItem

why is the chevys IFS any better than ours...or is it not and so on? cause trucking always has a bunch of chevys on 40's and all off roading and they dont seem to get hurt.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #2  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
I told you this before so I'll quote it again. And by the way, I think that chevy is pretty ugly (and I like almost all makes):
Originally Posted by Josiah
You will be fine running 40's, there are many people running them (on an FTS lift) and Craig (went to pismo with 41" Iroks, 12" FTS + 3" Body & 4.88's) used his truck out there with no problems and spoke of some other adventures he's taken it on. I wouldn't be too worried, you have lightweight tires.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #3  
patshea098's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 0
From: Braselton, Georgia
thanks josiah i do remember you saying that, just seems like alot of people here dont encourage like its the death sentence to my truck. though i do think pretty highly of your advice and what you say so that gives me some hope also.

but also the FTS kit is built for that tall of tires...if I were to do 40's, then i would have a Rize kit with 3 inch body.

im with you on the ugly chevys also....well...they aint too bad....when u look at the 2007's
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #4  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
I used to think they were a good looking truck when lifted but I can't say that anymore, they've lost their appeal. The interior is way behind, it's just a real basic truck. You will be fine running 40's just don't get a chevy, that looks rediculous. When Dave snapped his front shaft there was a chevy on 33's and some 8+" lift who snapped his front end as well, guy went crazy as I understood. I don't see why a 2500 diesel would have IFS up front anyways

Running 40" OC's is close to running 37" MG's (you'll have to find out their weight), you shouldn't have too much trouble.
 

Last edited by Josiah; Jul 13, 2006 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #5  
-TXF150-'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 2
From: Plano, TEXAS
Originally Posted by patshea098
thanks josiah i do remember you saying that, just seems like alot of people here dont encourage like its the death sentence to my truck. though i do think pretty highly of your advice and what you say so that gives me some hope also.

but also the FTS kit is built for that tall of tires...if I were to do 40's, then i would have a Rize kit with 3 inch body.

im with you on the ugly chevys also....well...they aint too bad....when u look at the 2007's
Ur 16 man, why dont you just go with ur original plan, and put some money away for school, and later on you can make ur truck as high as the empire state building if u want to...
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #6  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by -TXF150-
Ur 16 man, why dont you just go with ur original plan, and put some money away for school, and later on you can make ur truck as high as the empire state building if u want to...
Thats a great point Tx, but he ain't going to listen. I didn't and I don't think thump did either I have an extra buck or two saved for school and if needed I can sell this.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 07:57 PM
  #7  
patshea098's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 0
From: Braselton, Georgia
Originally Posted by Josiah
I used to think they were a good looking truck when lifted but I can't say that anymore, they've lost their appeal. The interior is way behind, it's just a real basic truck. You will be fine running 40's just don't get a chevy, that looks rediculous. When Dave snapped his front shaft there was a chevy on 33's and some 8+" lift who snapped his front end as well, guy went crazy as I understood. I don't see why a 2500 diesel would have IFS up front anyways

Running 40" OC's is close to running 37" MG's (you'll have to find out their weight), you shouldn't have too much trouble.
yeah i think its ridiculous that the chevy has a IFS being a 2500. so me running mickey thompson ATZ's would be like running say....38" MG's?? mabye? haha

well i just found a pretty good deal on a 2006 Ram Power Wagon (comes with winch and auto locking front/rear differential) 3000 something miles on it. and i can mabye get the price down a little more.

oh and TX i undertsnad your point....but being in georgia is great for school...because we have the HOPE Grant so if i have a 3.5 GPA i go to school in GA for free basically.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:04 PM
  #8  
etrevino103186's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 1
From: Lone Star State
it's just a lot of stress on the axle

EDIT: God knows I have blown all my money into my truck and all I have to my name is my truck.
 

Last edited by etrevino103186; Jul 13, 2006 at 08:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #9  
patshea098's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 0
From: Braselton, Georgia
dont want my axle snapping haha but this truck really has my attention, http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail...7&aff=national

lifts arent expensive at all either.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #10  
etrevino103186's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 1
From: Lone Star State
Originally Posted by patshea098
dont want my axle snapping haha but this truck really has my attention, http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail...7&aff=national

lifts arent expensive at all either.
if i were to go with a dodge i want a power wagon or a viper. either or
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
patshea098's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 0
From: Braselton, Georgia
Originally Posted by etrevino103186
if i were to go with a dodge i want a power wagon or a viper. either or
thats what i like to hear....a little support....i do love ford and alwasy will though.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:56 PM
  #12  
moose3776's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: WV
that interior is but *** ugly tho
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #13  
jangeloni's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Ar
why is the Chevy's IFS any better than ours...beacuse that one is on a 3/4 ton truck, and every thing is "HD"!
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #14  
patshea098's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 0
From: Braselton, Georgia
i like the interior...its roomy.....but i dont think ANY other truck on the market compares to the 150's interior.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #15  
SnowmaNick
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by moose3776
that interior is but *** ugly tho
The whole truck is freaking fugly. The new Rams with the cat eye headlamps look gay and the Chevy with the Avalanche front ends never looked good. Both have interiors that were ahead of their time though, as long as that time was 1992.

Just keep the F150 Pat, it's a better truck, better looking, you have the freaking parts for it already...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.