2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Very disappointed in the 5.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #46  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by JJG052590
Get a superchager,long tube headers,3" pipe back, intake,tuner that baby will be running 12s in the 1/4 prolly
This is why some (I never did until now) are criticizing your reply's, you have no foundation to make these claims, not one person on here is in the 12's with the new model 150. Please stop making such ludacris claims, that is a COMPLETE guess and all I hear you talk about is long tube headers in every suggestion this past week. No offense bud, but please stop posting false info.

Edit: Silverbullet beat me to it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:00 PM
  #47  
cyclone vampire's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: great white north
I don't like the 5.4, Mine is good on gas, has power when you lock out overdrive, Tows excellant....But the engine is loud and sounds like it's going to throw a rod or something, thiers all kinds of clanging and clunking in the valve train, engine has oil and Ford dealer can't find any thing wrong and I have the Ford Power stearing pump whine going on...I'm kicking my self for buying out my lease...

Out of the box the Hemi and Vorteck, Nissan engines out gun the 5.4, who wants to spend thier $$$$ to improve Fords lack of design...The automatic is what hinders the 5.4...I doubt my engine will see 100,000 KM
 

Last edited by cyclone vampire; Feb 1, 2006 at 08:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:00 PM
  #48  
JJG052590's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Alabama!
Originally Posted by Josiah
This is why some (I never did until now) are criticizing your reply's, you have no foundation to make these claims, not one person on here is in the 12's with the new model 150. Please stop making such ludacris claims, that is a COMPLETE guess and all I hear you talk about is long tube headers in every suggestion this past week. No offense bud, but please stop posting false info.

After thought about it I wasn't thinking.. It would be closer to in the high 14s-low 15s, Long tube headers what's wrong? They help flow and increase power...
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #49  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by JJG052590
After thought about it I wasn't thinking.. It would be closer to in the high 14s-low 15s, Long tube headers what's wrong? They help flow and increase power...
It's not the "silver bullet" (as RP would say) for our 5.4's like you parade it to be, nor is it close. Headers are a task and a half to put in our 5.4's and the gains are marginal.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #50  
JJG052590's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Alabama!
Originally Posted by Josiah
It's not the "silver bullet" (as RP would say) for our 5.4's like you parade it to be, nor is it close. Headers are a task and a half to put in our 5.4's and the gains are marginal.

Yes, I have like no interest in speed. If I did I would NOT of gotten a F-150, or a truck at all. I'm not trying to start anything just trying to get my point across in the best manner I can come up with. But, yes headers are a pain in the *** to even look at on these trucks, let alone change. But, more flow always will=more power and more sound!
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #51  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by JJG052590
Yes, I have like no interest in speed. If I did I would NOT of gotten a F-150, or a truck at all. I'm not trying to start anything just trying to get my point across in the best manner I can come up with. But, yes headers are a pain in the *** to even look at on these trucks, let alone change. But, more flow always will=more power and more sound!
I'm not trying to single you out, but you're throwing out false info all over the place. More flow certainly does not amount to power. Thats like saying more fuel equals more power, not the case in gas powered vehicles (it is in diesels, for the most part). There is a silver bullet to flow in the 5.4, and for N/A'd 5.4's the Maggie SISO seems to be the solution. You like to mention the flowmasters you recently put on (as I) reduced your low end, the reason is the lack of flow (in some mufflers cases), it's a damn box with resonating sound walls, not a straight-thru design like the maggie. If you look through the maggie you can see straight through it, the flowmaster, you can't. It's common sense on that aspect. Now as far as too much flow goes, if you did your own exhaust (can't remember if you did or not), when you had no muffler or piping connected behind the cats, you have a lot of popping because there was a strong lack of backpressure. Exhaust cutouts work the same way.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #52  
JJG052590's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Alabama!
Originally Posted by Josiah
I'm not trying to single you out, but you're throwing out false info all over the place. More flow certainly does not amount to power. Thats like saying more fuel equals more power, not the case in gas powered vehicles (it is in diesels, for the most part). There is a silver bullet to flow in the 5.4, and for N/A'd 5.4's the Maggie SISO seems to be the solution. You like to mention the flowmasters you recently put on (as I) reduced your low end, the reason is the lack of flow (in some mufflers cases), it's a damn box with resonating sound walls, not a straight-thru design like the maggie. If you look through the maggie you can see straight through it, the flowmaster, you can't. It's common sense on that aspect. Now as far as too much flow goes, if you did your own exhaust (can't remember if you did or not), when you had no muffler or piping connected behind the cats, you have a lot of popping because there was a strong lack of backpressure. Exhaust cutouts work the same way.
Alright, i've never heard of a flowmaster giving more power because it has stuff in the muffler it's not basically what the maggie is and is basically a straight pipe. The more flow=more power thing is usually to go with headers more than mufflers. I didn't install my Flowmaster, a shop did. But since the stock inlet I believe is 2.5" and the muffler I got has 3" inlet there for there is MORE flow into the muffler therefore you lose backpressure. Is this making sense. I'm confusing myself with what I'm typing.. Try to help me out here lol
I can say it better than I can type it
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #53  
assasinator's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: clarksville tn
Originally Posted by hellbound F-150
Wow !! You'd figure if people are going to post opinions they would atleast have enough knowledge to justify them.

Like I have said a hundred times before, it's ALL about set-up. Think of it this way. If you own a Lariat, extended cab, 2WD, 5.4L then you are already at around 5300lbs empty curb weight (loaded options). Even the lightest config supercab model is 5244lbs empty. Not to mention that is sitting on 32.7" tires with (in most cases) 3.55 gears. What exactly do you think the performance is going to be compared to a Quad Cab Hemi, on 33" tires, 3.92 gears (much lower), 5 speed auto OD tranny (more lower gearing), 45 more HP, 10 more ft lbs TQ, and about 350 lbs less weight. BTW, a RCSB 2WD Hemi on 20's weighs in at 4700lbs. My RCSB F150 5.4L on 17's weighed in at 4925lbs stock as an XL with ZERO power options, no carpet, and tiny little 235 tires.

My point is to to think about it. Of course it's faster, the numbers dont lie. HOWEVER, dont let the 5.4L fool you. We are also WAY de-tuned from the factory. Shifting at 4900 RPM when we should shift at around 5300-5400rpm, tuned for 87 octane, throttle by wire is modest for maximum fuel economy, just look at the intake system (WTF?), torque modulation is tuned for crap.

Take a stock RCSB HEMI vs a tuned RCSB F150 5.4L with similiar gearing and you will win or break dead even depending on driver.

In my case, I beat him over and over again. Of course now I am supercharged and he doesnt stand a chance in hell.

Also, yes some of you supercharged guys are still in the 15's in your non-intercooled, 5600lb loaded beast. You didnt see that coming?

I am running a 6lb Powerdyne non-intercooled and I can run in the 13's all day. All hail the RCSB.

that is exactly what i am saying. plenty of power if you can bypass that damned drive by wire and rev it to 5700
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:59 PM
  #54  
hwm3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
First, backpressure doesn't mean anything, it's exhaust scavenging that's important.

Second. Josiah, there is a big difference between shorty headers and long tubes with high flow cats.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #55  
JJG052590's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Alabama!
Originally Posted by hwm3
First, backpressure doesn't mean anything, it's exhaust scavenging that's important.

Second. Josiah, there is a big difference between shorty headers and long tubes with high flow cats.

I was told that the cats that are stock on the f150 are hi flow. is that correct?
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:04 PM
  #56  
assasinator's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: clarksville tn
Originally Posted by cyclone vampire
I don't like the 5.4, Mine is good on gas, has power when you lock out overdrive, Tows excellant....But the engine is loud and sounds like it's going to throw a rod or something, thiers all kinds of clanging and clunking in the valve train, engine has oil and Ford dealer can't find any thing wrong and I have the Ford Power stearing pump whine going on...I'm kicking my self for buying out my lease...

Out of the box the Hemi and Vorteck, Nissan engines out gun the 5.4, who wants to spend thier $$$$ to improve Fords lack of design...The automatic is what hinders the 5.4...I doubt my engine will see 100,000 KM



mine is dead quiet. i kick the crap out of hemi's in cars. i also own muffler/filter svt cobras, and LS chevy when i get cams.(just a claim until) all of the nissan g35's i leave behind. this is a killer. 5.4 3v and i am mostly stock.mine idles quiet, get 18 mpg, and pulls like hell from idle to 5700.

i AM automatic
 

Last edited by assasinator; Feb 1, 2006 at 09:07 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #57  
NASSTY's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: ME
I love these threads. Besides Lightnings,F150's aren't supposed to be fast so there not.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #58  
RamSS/T's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,651
Likes: 0
From: Albany, GA
Originally Posted by assasinator
mine is dead quiet. i kick the crap out of hemi's in cars. i also own muffler/filter svt cobras, and LS chevy when i get cams.(just a claim until) all of the nissan g35's i leave behind. this is a killer. 5.4 3v and i am mostly stock.mine idles quiet, get 18 mpg, and pulls like hell from idle to 5700.

i AM automatic
You talk about "LS" chevy's pretty regular. I asume you mean LS1s...with a cam set up you SHOULD be running with them. An LS1 in a F-Body is rated at 300HP..the same thing as the 3V in your Mustang. The advantage they have is the aluminum block and the ablity to mod as well. Your car with cams should run with a stock LS1 F-Body...anything other than stock and my bets on the LS1 (I have owned 3 LS1 cars so I know a little about them and they respond to mods very well).

Now as for LS2s (new Vettes and GTOs), LS6s (C5 Z06s) and LS7s (new Z06s)...well you will need a lot more than new cams to play with them. I say that because "LS" Chevies are not created equal!
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #59  
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: Waco/Houston
Originally Posted by RamSS/T
You talk about "LS" chevy's pretty regular. I asume you mean LS1s...with a cam set up you SHOULD be running with them. An LS1 in a F-Body is rated at 300HP..the same thing as the 3V in your Mustang. The advantage they have is the aluminum block and the ablity to mod as well. Your car with cams should run with a stock LS1 F-Body...anything other than stock and my bets on the LS1 (I have owned 3 LS1 cars so I know a little about them and they respond to mods very well).

Now as for LS2s (new Vettes and GTOs), LS6s (C5 Z06s) and LS7s (new Z06s)...well you will need a lot more than new cams to play with them. I say that because "LS" Chevies are not created equal!
Cams in these 3v's can pick up stupid amounts of power....
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 09:52 PM
  #60  
hwm3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
Cams in these 3v's can pick up stupid amounts of power....
Who makes cams for the 3vs?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.