Removal of intake baffle
Originally Posted by mkinttrim
PS Not worried about a little "redneck" mod. Many trucks have thrown cells because of the CAI they use that are recommended by MT. And many are complaining about the noise. I'd rather spend $10.15 on this Mod than over $300 and have cells thrown and then everytime I take it to the dealer have to take it off.
Originally Posted by mkinttrim
PS Not worried about a little "redneck" mod. Many trucks have thrown cells because of the CAI they use that are recommended by MT. And many are complaining about the noise. I'd rather spend $10.15 on this Mod than over $300 and have cells thrown and then everytime I take it to the dealer have to take it off.
Just calculated my Mileage.
I just filled up at the station and my mpg only dropped by 0.2.
MPG with Magnaflow SIDO but no intake mod = approximately 12.5
MPG with Magnaflow SIDO and DWV = approximately = 12.0
MPG with Magnaflow SIDO, AF1, Ecal2 and driving real hard = 11.8
I've been flooring my truck since I installed the AF! and Excal2 and only dropped 0.2 mpg. Not to bad.
I'd like to know what the mileage is while driving normal but I can't help stomping on the gas. At WOT it just sounds great and the performance is so impressive.
I still have to data log and send the info into to Troyer also.
I just filled up at the station and my mpg only dropped by 0.2.
MPG with Magnaflow SIDO but no intake mod = approximately 12.5
MPG with Magnaflow SIDO and DWV = approximately = 12.0
MPG with Magnaflow SIDO, AF1, Ecal2 and driving real hard = 11.8
I've been flooring my truck since I installed the AF! and Excal2 and only dropped 0.2 mpg. Not to bad.
I'd like to know what the mileage is while driving normal but I can't help stomping on the gas. At WOT it just sounds great and the performance is so impressive.
I still have to data log and send the info into to Troyer also.
Originally Posted by hwm3
So you think if you take your truck in for a warranty repair of the engine they won't care that you have added a piece of plumbing pipe to it?
Originally Posted by mkinttrim
With any horsepower increase the payoff is lower fuel mileage!
Originally Posted by Ruune
That is by far one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. An increase in hp does not necessarily mean that you're going to get less mileage- for example, an increase in airflow EFFICIENCY going in and out of your engine will typically increase in horsepower/torque AND increase in fuel economy... assuming all things remain constant- such as air pressure, temp, humidity, fuel, and driving habits- while allowing for your fuel injection system to compensate for the change in airflow. As for these slight decreases in MPG, I'd venture to say that these are FAR from controlled environments.
Agreed...one of the stupidest comments I've heard.
Guess what I should have said that MOST horsepower gains would decrease fuel mileage/economy. Guess not all do but if you have to buy premium fuel at an extra .10 a gallon to support a horsepower gain then is it really worth it? I like horsepower too but if you have to spend $500-$1000 to get an extra 50 HP and then have to buy premium fuel is that really cost effective?
Something to think about....
Do you think Ford would purposely spend thousands and thousands of dollars to Design, Engineer, prototype and finally tool up a baffle in order to hurt performance and reduce fuel economy?
Ford uses advanced computer airflow simulations to make sure that the intake delivers properly designed/specified airflow while meeting noise, performance and fuel economy targets. Believe me, if the baffle wasnt needed, it wouldnt be there in the first place.
Take a look at the stock intake. Its a massive, highly engineered, complicated structure. It would be alot cheaper just to run straight pipe. There is a reason they dont run straight pipe. Some people call the stock intake ugly, I think it is engineering "artwork". I look at it and imagine all the engineering time that went into its development.
Now, if you have a highly modified motor, you may have different intake requirements.
Do you think Ford would purposely spend thousands and thousands of dollars to Design, Engineer, prototype and finally tool up a baffle in order to hurt performance and reduce fuel economy?
Ford uses advanced computer airflow simulations to make sure that the intake delivers properly designed/specified airflow while meeting noise, performance and fuel economy targets. Believe me, if the baffle wasnt needed, it wouldnt be there in the first place.
Take a look at the stock intake. Its a massive, highly engineered, complicated structure. It would be alot cheaper just to run straight pipe. There is a reason they dont run straight pipe. Some people call the stock intake ugly, I think it is engineering "artwork". I look at it and imagine all the engineering time that went into its development.
Now, if you have a highly modified motor, you may have different intake requirements.
Take a look at the stock intake. Its a massive, highly engineered, complicated structure. It would be alot cheaper just to run straight pipe. There is a reason they dont run straight pipe. Some people call the stock intake ugly, I think it is engineering "artwork". I look at it and imagine all the engineering time that went into its development.
Last edited by expy03; Nov 25, 2005 at 09:18 AM.


