2004 - 2008 F-150

What Octane Rating are you Burning?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 02-24-2005, 07:43 PM
blitzkrieg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ski Country U.S.A. - Colorado
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87 octane. Runs great.
 
  #17  
Old 02-24-2005, 07:51 PM
Droog's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by deepblue
I am burning 98
You are wasting money

Unless you're using a tuner to allow you to utilize higher octane fuel.

Higher octane is just a delay in combustion. It's money in the toilet if you're on a stock engine.
 
  #18  
Old 02-24-2005, 08:20 PM
Nihilism's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nietzsche's Closet
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Droog
You are wasting money

Unless you're using a tuner to allow you to utilize higher octane fuel.

Higher octane is just a delay in combustion. It's money in the toilet if you're on a stock engine.
Deepblue lives in Turkey, so I think the gas stations and the octane numbers might be a little different over there than they are here in the US.
 
  #19  
Old 02-24-2005, 09:18 PM
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunny FL
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
  #20  
Old 02-25-2005, 01:26 AM
gah1130's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Economics of 89 octane

I'm not going to get into the issues of benefits of octane as far as the performance is concerned, just the economics. Let's say your paying 1.80 for 87 octane, 1.90 for 89, and 2.00 for 93. You don't notice a little error in the math do you? Since no refinery makes 89 octane, and it is only a blend of 87 and 93 made at the terminal you are actually paying 1/2 the difference between 87 and 93 without getting 1/2 of the added octane. You are actually getting a 3:1.5 blend of 87 to 93 octane. And it's costing you 0.05 c/octane for the 89 vs. 0.033 c/octane for the 93

Sorry, it's just the facts.
 
  #21  
Old 02-25-2005, 12:36 PM
DrTechnical's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87, 89, whatever it takes....
 
  #22  
Old 04-04-2005, 02:23 PM
gsapatka's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Octane Level

Wouldn't it be chaper to just buy a fuel octane booster insted in buying 27 gallons at $2.00-$2.50 a gallon?

 
  #23  
Old 04-04-2005, 03:16 PM
Nihilism's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nietzsche's Closet
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Octane Level

Originally posted by gsapatka
Wouldn't it be chaper to just buy a fuel octane booster insted in buying 27 gallons at $2.00-$2.50 a gallon?

It would be cheaper, but it wouldn't be a wise move to do that to your truck. Check out the chips/programing section and the powertrain sections of this site to see what I'm talking about. There are several threads about using octance boosters on a regular basis in those sections.
 
  #24  
Old 04-04-2005, 03:20 PM
1969Mach's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm still doing 85 octane. No problems, and it's running great.

Altitude here is 4080.
 
  #25  
Old 04-04-2005, 03:46 PM
valley818's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
  #26  
Old 04-04-2005, 04:31 PM
Copenhagen848's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
93 with the high perf tune.
 
  #27  
Old 04-04-2005, 04:40 PM
kbldawg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marshall, AR
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^ Same here
 
  #28  
Old 04-04-2005, 05:54 PM
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87 octane.
 
  #29  
Old 04-04-2005, 07:47 PM
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunny FL
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
93-octane Sunoco Super Pure
 
  #30  
Old 04-04-2005, 09:35 PM
MnFatz's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jpdadeo


When dealing with *quality* fuels, the actual BTU content per gallon (or per lb.) of fuel usually does not vary much regardless of octane (in the 87-100 octane range, R+M/2). The actual energy content of gasoline is expressed by the oil company/refiner in terms of the number of BTU's per gallon - say, 110,000 BTU's per gallon, or 98,000 BTU's per gallon, etc. - and that is not "automatically" increased or decreased (all else being equal) based solely on the octane rating.

Killer post!

Octane is a measure of fuel stability, not BTU rating. Repeat, repeat, repeat.

Someone correct me if Im wrong, but I'm fairly certain ethanol (and blends) have a lower BTU rating. A 10% ethanol rating yields a 3-5% decrease in BTU. That can't possible be linear or we'd be in the realm of charcoal starter for the 85% stuff I used to buy occasionally for my old Ranger.

Now..what about detonation and pre-ignition? There's work on motors that take advantage of this. Sorta like a gasoline powered diesel style motor. Sortof a 'controlled detonation' motor. I think I'll wait out the first model year on that one...

-Fatz

p.s. Isn't the 5.4 designed for 87 octane? I thought the owners manual said specifically NOT to use higher octanes.
 


Quick Reply: What Octane Rating are you Burning?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.