2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

front brakes shot at 35k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #1  
danosaves's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: riverside ca.
front brakes shot at 35k

i know im kinda hard on brakes but isnt 35k a little early. started hearing[and feeling] the grind sunday about 1/4 through a 200 mile round trip. trucks at the dealer now. i figure the rotors are prob. shot. looking at about 700 bucks. should i make a stink or bite the bullet cause i didnt have brake inspects every 10k like i should.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #2  
Buck Henry's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Can't speak for the F150 brakes yet, but my Sport Trac was the same way. I needed new front pads on the Trac at 30,000 miles.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #3  
IWanna04F150's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: So CA
My Explorer had 10% of the front brakes left after 32,000 miles. Probably 75% of City and 25% of highway.


BB
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #4  
SteveVFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
if you admit you are kind of hard on brakes, and you got 35k miles out of them, then you have nothing to complain about....

Prior to this, I also had a Sport Trac and my front pads went at 16k miles.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #5  
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 6
From: Georgia on my mind...
'03 and newer Expeditions and Navigators use basically the same setup as an '04+ F150, minus different rotors and pads, and they're extremely hard on brakes. Think like 15K miles on average. You're stopping a very heavy vehicle repeatedly several times a day. Plus to this if you're doing lots of in town stop and go driving.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #6  
Gearhead99's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Oviedo, FL
Sounds about normal to me. The only vehicles that get much better brake mileage are from customers that are "easy" on brakes and also do a majority of highway driving.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #7  
purpony's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: CT
dont worry about it... at least your engine made it to 35K .....
Im not replacing my brakes.. only my entire engine at 1353 miles.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 01:38 AM
  #8  
danosaves's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: riverside ca.
you folks are right. i just thought it was a little premature. but when i factor in that i have the h/d payload pack.8200gvwr plus tools plus product im adding another 1 to 1.5 k at any given time.thats a lotta truck to stop so maybe im lucky. learned my lesson though and will have them checked every 10k or so since its costing $1000 to replace two front rotors and pads all around. never again [i hope ]
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #9  
RockyJSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 2
Wow, that's a lot of labor charges. Brakes are fairly easy, I've done my own for the last 20 years. 2 new front discs and pads all around (parts only) should be $300-$350 tops. If you're paying $650 in labor then you're getting ripped off.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #10  
SilvrDrgn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Wauwatosa, WI, USA
Aren't they covered by warranty ?? How about if one has an extended warranty ??
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #11  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Wear items are not covered under the basic warranty,
Wiper blades, oil and filters, brake pads.
I have never even been in the same room with an extended warranty but I doubt those items are covered. If they were an extended warranty would be a good deal, which it ain't.

The exception would be tires which have their own seperate warranty and batteries just because their life should exceed three years regardless of where you are and what you do.

Oil and filter degrade everyday for everybody.
Drivers in the Pacific Northwest are hard on wipers due to weather. Drivers in heavy city traffic like Atlanta will prematurely wear out their brakes.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #12  
jztbcz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: somewhere east of west.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by RockyJSquirrel
[B]Wow, that's a lot of labor charges. Brakes are fairly easy, I've done my own for the last 20 years. 2 new front discs and pads all around (parts only) should be $300-$350 tops. If you're paying $650 in labor then you're getting ripped off.

--------------------------------------------------------------

YA YOU ARE !!!!! AND IN A BIG WAY TOO .....
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #13  
MCG DAWG's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
I'm real hard on brakes . . .

. . .and had to have mine replaced and rotors turned at 23K.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 09:27 AM
  #14  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
For the statistical record, front brake pads @ 75k
Rear are still original @ 86k.
My last truck got new pads @ 110k

(I don't stop for nuthin)
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #15  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Raoul
For the statistical record, front brake pads @ 75k
Rear are still original @ 86k.
My last truck got new pads @ 110k

(I don't stop for nuthin)

consistent with my 98 2wd reg cab short box... which is at least 1000 lighter than a 2004 SCrew 4x4.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 AM.