Lincoln Mark LT
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
It looks nice to me, not $50K nice though. I would rather drop the cash on a King Ranch (if I had it to drop 
). I'm guessing that a good portion of it is paying for the privledge to drive a "Lincoln".
). I'm guessing that a good portion of it is paying for the privledge to drive a "Lincoln".
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: L-town, Michigan
Originally posted by gpaje
The Explorer based Aviator has bombed, mainly because it's too close to the price of the Navigator, so what’s the point?
The Explorer based Aviator has bombed, mainly because it's too close to the price of the Navigator, so what’s the point?
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: L-town, Michigan
Originally posted by Dunk
Lincoln and Caddy both should stay out of the truck and SUV biz. They both build nice cars and should stick with that. There's absolutely no reason for everyone to build everything.
Lincoln and Caddy both should stay out of the truck and SUV biz. They both build nice cars and should stick with that. There's absolutely no reason for everyone to build everything.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
I may have purchased it if I didn't already get my Lariat. Its nice, and the dealers are not going to get MSRP anyway... I'd expect to pay 33-35K for the LT. Not a bad deal. Heck, a loaded Lariat can sticker over 40K. Adding 6-7K for the Lincoln seems fare. I can't wait to test drive one - I wonder if they worked the engine over a little to give it that lincoln silky-smoothness... also wonder if it's quieter. If it has both, were do I sign?