Audiophile play MP3/WMA?
Audiophile play MP3/WMA?
apologies if this has already been covered - I took a quick look and couldn't find anything so here goes...
just curious (as I sit here knowing my truck is on the train so I am using small facts about the truck to try and string me along until it gets here
will the CD player in the Audiophile play/read MP3 and/or WMA formats?
thanks
just curious (as I sit here knowing my truck is on the train so I am using small facts about the truck to try and string me along until it gets here
will the CD player in the Audiophile play/read MP3 and/or WMA formats?
thanks
NO and in todays music environment for a MSRP 40k truck that sucks......
I love my truck but Ford should of put some thought into the awesome audiophile system and add mp3 and XM capabilities.
JMO
freddy
I love my truck but Ford should of put some thought into the awesome audiophile system and add mp3 and XM capabilities.
JMO
freddy
You might call me pessimistic, but I doubt you'll EVER see a radio with WMA capabilities. WMA is a proprietary Microsoft file type which requires Windows Media Player to work, whereas MP3 is a universal file type that doesn't.
Besides, you're better off with AAC (MP4's) encoded audio anyway. Smaller file sizes and better audio with AAC compression. It's the win.
Besides, you're better off with AAC (MP4's) encoded audio anyway. Smaller file sizes and better audio with AAC compression. It's the win.
Trending Topics
Are you smoking crack?
Ok, I can't resist. I work for a large Software company in Redmond, WA in the area of digital audio/video.
"Truck of Doom's" comment about staying away from WMA because of its "lossy" is just silly. Any compression format will result in the loss of data, but loss of data isn't an issue unless the human ear can hear the difference.
You can say WMA sucks ***, but you are clearly not coming from a position of knowledge. Give it a try and rip the same song in two formats and then listen. Microsoft does a LOT of consumer and professional testing to determine what will work best for the consumer. This probably isn't the place to go into the specifics of the codec or how the different compression types effect highs/lows, etc.
Don't mean to get off topic here, but I just had to refute that silly comment.
Ok, I can't resist. I work for a large Software company in Redmond, WA in the area of digital audio/video.
"Truck of Doom's" comment about staying away from WMA because of its "lossy" is just silly. Any compression format will result in the loss of data, but loss of data isn't an issue unless the human ear can hear the difference.
You can say WMA sucks ***, but you are clearly not coming from a position of knowledge. Give it a try and rip the same song in two formats and then listen. Microsoft does a LOT of consumer and professional testing to determine what will work best for the consumer. This probably isn't the place to go into the specifics of the codec or how the different compression types effect highs/lows, etc.
Don't mean to get off topic here, but I just had to refute that silly comment.
Beg to differ ....
Originally posted by Truck of Doom
Yep. I was wrong.
I would stay away from WMA anyways, as the compression is lossy and it sucks ***.
Yep. I was wrong.
I would stay away from WMA anyways, as the compression is lossy and it sucks ***.
It is by definition lossy, as are MP3's, however a 96Kbps WMA file has the audio fidelity of a 128Kbps MP3 file.
Ergo, it hardly 'sucks ***' ...
The Microsoft variable bit rate encoder approaches lossless compression, but with obviously less compression.
Additionally, WMA compatable units have been widely available for some time, most popularily in the Creative Nomad Zen players and the like. Apple, of course, does not support WMA on their INSANELY overpriced IPods, however.
And there is NO REASON why Visteon (Ford) could not add MP3/WMA support to their Audiophile units. $15,000 Mazda Protege head units support it !!!
That is seriously weak ........
Last edited by TSSCS; Jan 4, 2004 at 01:00 AM.
well it's good to know there are other geeks driving f150s out there - I don't feel quite so alone
ok - well while we are on this topic, how about another related question - anyone try burning their own CD audio disks and getting them to work in the Audiophile CD Player? I'd like to put my own CD audio CD together but find as a frequent rental car driver some CD's will read CDRs and some will not...
thx
ok - well while we are on this topic, how about another related question - anyone try burning their own CD audio disks and getting them to work in the Audiophile CD Player? I'd like to put my own CD audio CD together but find as a frequent rental car driver some CD's will read CDRs and some will not...
thx
Originally posted by Zeusalicious
Are you smoking crack?
Ok, I can't resist. I work for a large Software company in Redmond, WA in the area of digital audio/video.
"Truck of Doom's" comment about staying away from WMA because of its "lossy" is just silly. Any compression format will result in the loss of data, but loss of data isn't an issue unless the human ear can hear the difference.
You can say WMA sucks ***, but you are clearly not coming from a position of knowledge. Give it a try and rip the same song in two formats and then listen. Microsoft does a LOT of consumer and professional testing to determine what will work best for the consumer. This probably isn't the place to go into the specifics of the codec or how the different compression types effect highs/lows, etc.
Don't mean to get off topic here, but I just had to refute that silly comment.
Are you smoking crack?
Ok, I can't resist. I work for a large Software company in Redmond, WA in the area of digital audio/video.
"Truck of Doom's" comment about staying away from WMA because of its "lossy" is just silly. Any compression format will result in the loss of data, but loss of data isn't an issue unless the human ear can hear the difference.
You can say WMA sucks ***, but you are clearly not coming from a position of knowledge. Give it a try and rip the same song in two formats and then listen. Microsoft does a LOT of consumer and professional testing to determine what will work best for the consumer. This probably isn't the place to go into the specifics of the codec or how the different compression types effect highs/lows, etc.
Don't mean to get off topic here, but I just had to refute that silly comment.
As far as the comment you made regarding me smoking crack, I'm not...but you are obviously smoking MS's ****.
I just received my new 2004 with the audiophile system. The summary instructions that came with my manual indicate it will take mp3 cds so I tried a couple. Didn't work. I suspect they expected it to work and didn't require the supplier to provide the functionality. I'm going to try a warranty complaint when I take it in for my 1st service.


