1997 - 2003 F-150

MAF question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2019 | 11:28 PM
  #16  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
Of course he should test it, I was just saying. He's not buying the right parts at the right places.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2019 | 12:13 AM
  #17  
jimbo74's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 818
Likes: 35
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by glc
Of course he should test it, I was just saying. He's not buying the right parts at the right places.

No I hear you, just seems he wants to do all this other stuff but not test it. There are lots of ways to get OE parts without paying dealer prices.

FSM or Chilton's/Haynes should have the procedures for test8ng the MAF
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2019 | 10:31 PM
  #18  
J_P's Avatar
J_P
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 18
From: SW WA
I'm not resistant to testing just want to make sure I can do it right.

Good news is I found a video which also happens to be on the same vehicle.


Ran the tests and everything checked out good for the MAF. Power voltage was 12 volts and signal voltage was in specified range at idle and acceleration. Voltage movement was smooth during acceleration and deceleration.

When the pcv valve arrives I will replace it and see if that solves the problem.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2019 | 12:11 AM
  #19  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
There is a possibility that this was coincidental. The V6 plastic intakes have a tendency to need new plenum gaskets and isolator bolts. I've had to have that done on mine.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2019 | 01:28 AM
  #20  
J_P's Avatar
J_P
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 18
From: SW WA
Originally Posted by glc
There is a possibility that this was coincidental. The V6 plastic intakes have a tendency to need new plenum gaskets and isolator bolts. I've had to have that done on mine.
Wouldn't that show up as a vacuum leak? I didn't detect any vacuum leaks and the engine is running smoothly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2019 | 12:30 PM
  #21  
jgger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 6
From: Corona, Crazyfornia
I would put my money on the isolator bolts. My 03 had about the same miles when the lean codes popped up and I was going about a sustained 75 mph, so much for the vac issue only at idle. The lean codes are from sucking extra air, so at high air demand (speed) the stress is on the gaskets and isolator bolts. Chances are it is not the manifold to head gaskets, but the rubber figure 8's between the plenum and manifold. The bolts are single use with the rubber plugs on them. It used to be that the Ford ones were the only way to go and they were very proud of them. I think that the Dorman ones have been improved now, but that's your choice.

2 other things to look at are the hose& pipe going to the PCV and and the hard plastic vac lines.

There are some write ups in the DIY, or search "isolator bolts ".

Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2019 | 11:04 PM
  #22  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
Old Sep 29, 2019 | 11:51 PM
  #23  
J_P's Avatar
J_P
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 18
From: SW WA
The V6 plastic intakes have a tendency to need new plenum gaskets and isolator bolts.
.........
I would put my money on the isolator bolts.
This may be my problem. Is there any diagnostic to verify if this is the source of the air ?
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2019 | 08:59 PM
  #24  
J_P's Avatar
J_P
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 18
From: SW WA
Well, no luck..... Swapped out the pcv valves, cleared the codes and went for a test drive. CEL came back on, same codes - lean fuel banks 1 and 2. Similar freeze frame data.

So, the MAF is good, the pcv valve is good and a vacuum test on the engine did not indicate any leaks. Engine is running smooth and normal and I have a healthy, brightly lit CEL.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2019 | 09:44 PM
  #25  
jgger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 6
From: Corona, Crazyfornia
Read the link glc posted, that is a very good DIY.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2019 | 10:10 PM
  #26  
J_P's Avatar
J_P
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 18
From: SW WA
Originally Posted by jgger
Read the link glc posted, that is a very good DIY.
That article deserves an award. I just wish there was a way to test that the plenum was indeed the problem. I hate to go thru all that and still have the original problem.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2019 | 10:14 PM
  #27  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
Use an unlit propane torch to look for vacuum leaks, when the propane is sucked in the fuel trims should change.

Note - exhaust leaks upstream of the O2 sensors can cause lean codes.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2019 | 10:36 PM
  #28  
jgger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 6
From: Corona, Crazyfornia
Originally Posted by J_P
That article deserves an award. I just wish there was a way to test that the plenum was indeed the problem. I hate to go thru all that and still have the original problem.
I was the same way with mine finally bit the bullet and parked the truck with 356,000 miles and never another lean code. I did the work at about 80,000 miles. It would be hard to detect with propane unless the plenum is cracked, but it's worth a try.

Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2019 | 10:52 PM
  #29  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
As I remember, I had about 120k on mine when the job was done. Mine was not tripping lean codes, it was a stuck IMRC code.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2019 | 07:38 PM
  #30  
J_P's Avatar
J_P
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Likes: 18
From: SW WA
Update on my 171/174 codes....Problem solved!

I couldn't get past the coincidence of getting the lean fuel codes right after changing the MAF. So I removed the air intake duct downstream of the MAF and looked for cracks or damage in the ductwork. No damage found but I did see a rigid tube from the driver side valve cover to the air duct was not seated correctly. I also noticed the temperature sensor was not turned to be parallel to the air flow.

I corrected both, reassembled the air duct, cleared the codes and have driven about 50 miles with no CEL reappearing.

I think I have it solved.

Thanks to everyone for the help
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.