1997 - 2003 F-150

Modular 5.0 Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2013 | 10:47 PM
  #16  
jethat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,522
Likes: 6
From: Utah
Yeah using a totaled doner would be the way to go. I think if a guy were to do it that way it is doable..
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2013 | 08:43 AM
  #17  
chrmar's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Saint John, NB
There was a guy that swapped a 3v 5.4L into a '79 Bronco; he started with a totalled truck. Everything he needed was right there.
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2013 | 10:47 PM
  #18  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Originally Posted by Fordtrucktexan
Here you go, only $8900 but you get the whole car.

http://erepairables.com/salvage-clas...ustang-2856842

For $1000 more, you can get this truck, also with a 5.0

http://erepairables.com/salvage-clas...-f-150-2803501
The truck is a 4x4 so the trans is no good to the 2wd guys


good to see those are reasonably priced. I bet you could part out the good body parts and interior and make back a couple grand
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 07:22 AM
  #19  
chrmar's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Saint John, NB
Originally Posted by Patman
The truck is a 4x4 so the trans is no good to the 2wd guys
You could always do what Ford did with the 2WD Bronco II and put in a dummy transfercase.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 01:43 AM
  #20  
Fordtrucktexan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Beaumont, Tx
Originally Posted by chrmar
There was a guy that swapped a 3v 5.4L into a '79 Bronco; he started with a totalled truck. Everything he needed was right there.
You're talking about this guy. Project still amazes me to this day, it wasn't just an engine swap, he literally swapped an entire 04' F150 into the chassis and body of a 79 Bronco.

http://home.comcast.net/~qcrispin/bronco/
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 05:02 AM
  #21  
AlfredB18's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 500
Likes: 1
From: La Porte, TX
Originally Posted by Bluegrass
Avoiding is a huge term here.
There are so many differences you better be prepaired for a long bout of problem solveing.
1. The program from your version has advanced one version to a system called "CAN" and is not compatable with your version.
2. The wire harness is all different.
3. The trans control out of the new PCM is totally different.
4. The PATS system the new PCM uses will have to be addressed in some way.
5. All the small problems that will come up.
The factory takes years to work out a model so your not going to 'marry' parts in a few months and have it be even near perfect and trouble free.
After it might get done, your now the expert. There is no one to go to for help on a problem you can't solve.
Good luck.
I'm just thinking here...the engine doesn't care what computer is running it as long as it runs right. If the Coyote is just an updated Triton, why couldn't one just theoretically drop it in place and use what's around it? I have no idea how much tweaking would need to be done to a 4.6/5.4 harness for this to work, but...it beats doing what Ford has to do to make the trans and anything else tied to these newer trucks work. That would, I imagine, solve the PATS issue and anything that crops up involving the 6-speed auto trans if it's not put to use.

Originally Posted by Patman
I absolutely would do the swap as well, but I don't have the 6grand to drop on a engine, and still need a harness, and all that....

Also would consider doing a V10 swap for towing purposes in my red truck.
I wouldn't. You end up with heavier engine, heavier trans, heavier axles....still a 1/2-ton frame. Doesn't sound like a winner in terms of towing ability to me.
 

Last edited by AlfredB18; Jan 19, 2013 at 05:04 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 01:35 PM
  #22  
Bluegrass's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 39
From: Easton, Pa.
Wink

Al,
respectfully, your not paying close enough attention to what I gave you for info and just brushing it all off.
The motor is larger in displacement,
The motor has different camshaft control hardware,
The motor has different fueling requirements,
The motor needs different ignition timing response curves to throttle and load applications.
The motor has electronic throttle control.
And there are many more differences.
.
Your original PCM cannot even begin to run a 5L motor with any amount of 'tweaking'.
Reason I try to get your attention is you spring for the motor and get into the project and get hung up and abandon it due to not researching enough before hand so you at least have half a chance of some sucess.

5$ for the part and 95$ for the advice.
Sound like a Lawyer?
Good luck whatever you decide.
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2016 | 07:04 PM
  #23  
2008_XL's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 4
From: Burlington, VT
Originally Posted by DoGG38
All fenders bolt on from 1st gen the 4gen you just need to mod the radiator support
because the grill and head lights bolt to it.
2014 LINCOLN Navigator Converted from a 1997 FORD Expedition front end swap - YouTube
2014 LINCOLN Navigator Converted from a 1997 FORD Expedition Rear-end Swap (Part 1) - YouTube
No offense, but how many times are you going to post the above videos on this forum? I've seen these links in more than 10 threads so far.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 09:29 AM
  #24  
Dneel81's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
aint been done yet, so be the first. Do it and be the 5.0 Coyote swap guy on all the threads like JMC is the 4.6-5.4 swap guy that everyone bugs the hell out of with 4 billion questions a day about information that's already been covered. Sounds fun.
automotive design guys aren't geniuses. They can do it, we can do it.
You know it's going to be expensive but everything worth having is. Realizing how much frustration and trial/error is inherent in this project is more than half the battle.
Guys on here will help you as they can. Pretty nice group of folks compared to the *******s over at pirate4x4 (I'm one there too).


if it was easy, women and children would do it.
P.S. I want a coyote in my 2001 f150 4.6 m5OD, so my encouragement to you has somewhat of an ulterior motive (***Disclaimer***). I have not the money for the ZF5 nor the Coyote motor/harness. That and my 1997 Tahoe LQ9 swap is taking too much money and time. In the end I'll see which motor was more difficult to swap in, the Chevy lq9 or the Coyote.
Or I'll say FIA and put another LQ9 and an NV4500 into my FORD PICKUP TRUCK. On 2nd thought, probably won't tell too many people about it.

Anyway, good luck!

DN
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 03:15 PM
  #25  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
There are several LS engine 10th gen swaps running around.


This thread is from 2013 and let's just say I'm much closer to the Coyote swap than I was in 2013
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 05:59 PM
  #26  
dirtyd88's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 2
From: Burleson, TX
Originally Posted by Dneel81
aint been done yet, so be the first. Do it and be the 5.0 Coyote swap guy on all the threads like JMC is the 4.6-5.4 swap guy that everyone bugs the hell out of with 4 billion questions a day about information that's already been covered. Sounds fun.
automotive design guys aren't geniuses. They can do it, we can do it.
You know it's going to be expensive but everything worth having is. Realizing how much frustration and trial/error is inherent in this project is more than half the battle.
Guys on here will help you as they can. Pretty nice group of folks compared to the *******s over at pirate4x4 (I'm one there too).


if it was easy, women and children would do it.
P.S. I want a coyote in my 2001 f150 4.6 m5OD, so my encouragement to you has somewhat of an ulterior motive (***Disclaimer***). I have not the money for the ZF5 nor the Coyote motor/harness. That and my 1997 Tahoe LQ9 swap is taking too much money and time. In the end I'll see which motor was more difficult to swap in, the Chevy lq9 or the Coyote.
Or I'll say FIA and put another LQ9 and an NV4500 into my FORD PICKUP TRUCK. On 2nd thought, probably won't tell too many people about it.

Anyway, good luck!

DN
I don't think the M5 would last too long behind a Coyote.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 10:05 PM
  #27  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Originally Posted by dirtyd88
I don't think the M5 would last too long behind a Coyote.
True, the M50D isnt known for its strength, its a Mazda/Ranger transmission



But if you're dead set on a manual transmission you can actually get an adapter plate for the Coyote to run a T56 behind it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 10:00 AM
  #28  
Dneel81's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Im not planning on running an M5OD behind a 400+ hp engine. JMC does it (5.4 SC last time I checked) but he can swap a tranny faster than me. I'm planning a ZF5 behind a Coyote. Or a Tranzilla (t6060 i think...maybe an upgraded 4x4 t56. Hadn't checked with Rockland in a bit).

Ill always have a manual tranny in my trucks. Bit off more than I could chew in making my 2 door tahoe a stick. Will definately keep my F150 a stick.
God help me if I buy a new Yukon or Tahoe...
 

Last edited by Dneel81; Jan 28, 2016 at 10:25 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 10:56 AM
  #29  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
A ZF5 is almost bulletproof, but it's a clunky long throw tranny.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2016 | 12:42 PM
  #30  
Dneel81's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
It is. I agree. The wife's new 5.0 is always there if I need to speed shift and get a ticket on paved roads.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.