high flow cats
Here is some reference information from flow tests conducted on cat converters.
Flow tests on a flow bench at 20.4 inches of water pressure show a flow of 2.2 cfm per 1 hp is min before power begins to suffer.
Removing cats only gained about 8 hp on an actual dyno test. Not enough to hardly be felt in the driver's seat.
If you know the cat flow in CFM then you can find the HP supported without much loss by dividing the total flow by 2.2 to = the gas flow supported HP.
For example a flow of 550 cfm divided by 2.2 = 250 hp.
If you spend money on hi-flow cats be sure they truely are higher flowing and then be sure the rest of the exhaust system is not killing the increase or you end up with no chance of power improvement from the investment.
Bottom line is on a stock truck the cats are not much of a restriction for the volume of gas that flows.
To help key in on this a little closer, consider an old 302/5L Ford motor will pump about 500 cfm at 5000 rpm.
This is calculated by cylinder displacement x 8 at the desired rpm minus head flow losses and other flow restrictions between the inlet and the outlets.
So the 4.6L is smaller but heads flows a bit better so the airflow would be somewhere in line with 500 at 5000 but you don't normally run down the road at those rpms.
Bottom line is not to place to much emphisis on a high flow cat change unless the motor is highly modified to make much more hp (pass more air) at higher rpm where the extra flow makes a difference..
Thinking of any performance increase at normal driving speeds from cat replacement is just not realistic because the gas flow is well below any cat restriction point unless the cats are getting blocked for some other reason such as missfire causing temperatures to go so high the internal structure melts and forms a restriction or they break up.
The factory does not leave very much on the table for HP loss from exhaust systems on the normal truck application.
They can't afford to do so from a competitive point.
Flow tests on a flow bench at 20.4 inches of water pressure show a flow of 2.2 cfm per 1 hp is min before power begins to suffer.
Removing cats only gained about 8 hp on an actual dyno test. Not enough to hardly be felt in the driver's seat.
If you know the cat flow in CFM then you can find the HP supported without much loss by dividing the total flow by 2.2 to = the gas flow supported HP.
For example a flow of 550 cfm divided by 2.2 = 250 hp.
If you spend money on hi-flow cats be sure they truely are higher flowing and then be sure the rest of the exhaust system is not killing the increase or you end up with no chance of power improvement from the investment.
Bottom line is on a stock truck the cats are not much of a restriction for the volume of gas that flows.
To help key in on this a little closer, consider an old 302/5L Ford motor will pump about 500 cfm at 5000 rpm.
This is calculated by cylinder displacement x 8 at the desired rpm minus head flow losses and other flow restrictions between the inlet and the outlets.
So the 4.6L is smaller but heads flows a bit better so the airflow would be somewhere in line with 500 at 5000 but you don't normally run down the road at those rpms.
Bottom line is not to place to much emphisis on a high flow cat change unless the motor is highly modified to make much more hp (pass more air) at higher rpm where the extra flow makes a difference..
Thinking of any performance increase at normal driving speeds from cat replacement is just not realistic because the gas flow is well below any cat restriction point unless the cats are getting blocked for some other reason such as missfire causing temperatures to go so high the internal structure melts and forms a restriction or they break up.
The factory does not leave very much on the table for HP loss from exhaust systems on the normal truck application.
They can't afford to do so from a competitive point.
Last edited by Bluegrass; May 9, 2011 at 09:47 PM.
Here is some reference information from flow tests conducted on cat converters.
Flow tests on a flow bench at 20.4 inches of water pressure show a flow of 2.2 cfm per 1 hp is min before power begins to suffer.
Removing cats only gained about 8 hp on an actual dyno test. Not enough to hardly be felt in the driver's seat.
If you know the cat flow in CFM then you can find the HP supported without much loss by dividing the total flow by 2.2 to = the gas flow supported HP.
For example a flow of 550 cfm divided by 2.2 = 250 hp.
If you spend money on hi-flow cats be sure they truely are higher flowing and then be sure the rest of the exhaust system is not killing the increase or you end up with no chance of power improvement from the investment.
Bottom line is on a stock truck the cats are not much of a restriction for the volume of gas that flows.
To help key in on this a little closer, consider an old 302/5L Ford motor will pump about 500 cfm at 5000 rpm.
This is calculated by cylinder displacement x 8 at the desired rpm minus head flow losses and other flow restrictions between the inlet and the outlets.
So the 4.6L is smaller but heads flows a bit better so the airflow would be somewhere in line with 500 at 5000 but you don't normally run down the road at those rpms.
Bottom line is not to place to much emphisis on a high flow cat change unless the motor is highly modified to make much more hp (pass more air) at higher rpm where the extra flow makes a difference..
Thinking of any performance increase at normal driving speeds from cat replacement is just not realistic because the gas flow is well below any cat restriction point unless the cats are getting blocked for some other reason such as missfire causing temperatures to go so high the internal structure melts and forms a restriction or they break up.
The factory does not leave very much on the table for HP loss from exhaust systems on the normal truck application.
They can't afford to do so from a competive point.
Flow tests on a flow bench at 20.4 inches of water pressure show a flow of 2.2 cfm per 1 hp is min before power begins to suffer.
Removing cats only gained about 8 hp on an actual dyno test. Not enough to hardly be felt in the driver's seat.
If you know the cat flow in CFM then you can find the HP supported without much loss by dividing the total flow by 2.2 to = the gas flow supported HP.
For example a flow of 550 cfm divided by 2.2 = 250 hp.
If you spend money on hi-flow cats be sure they truely are higher flowing and then be sure the rest of the exhaust system is not killing the increase or you end up with no chance of power improvement from the investment.
Bottom line is on a stock truck the cats are not much of a restriction for the volume of gas that flows.
To help key in on this a little closer, consider an old 302/5L Ford motor will pump about 500 cfm at 5000 rpm.
This is calculated by cylinder displacement x 8 at the desired rpm minus head flow losses and other flow restrictions between the inlet and the outlets.
So the 4.6L is smaller but heads flows a bit better so the airflow would be somewhere in line with 500 at 5000 but you don't normally run down the road at those rpms.
Bottom line is not to place to much emphisis on a high flow cat change unless the motor is highly modified to make much more hp (pass more air) at higher rpm where the extra flow makes a difference..
Thinking of any performance increase at normal driving speeds from cat replacement is just not realistic because the gas flow is well below any cat restriction point unless the cats are getting blocked for some other reason such as missfire causing temperatures to go so high the internal structure melts and forms a restriction or they break up.
The factory does not leave very much on the table for HP loss from exhaust systems on the normal truck application.
They can't afford to do so from a competive point.
x3. They are strictly to improve the volume, and to which I must say they do a GREAT job. I love mine.
You can have them shipped to your door for $100 and installed for roughly that same amount depending on the shop.
You can have them shipped to your door for $100 and installed for roughly that same amount depending on the shop.
Trending Topics
There are 4 OX senors, two on each side.
The rear sensors are in the 'middle' of the stock rear cats.
You will need to place rear sensor 'bungs' at some point just back of the last cat unless the rear cats have that sensor port.
If these rear OX sensors are missing or do not work as designed you will get efficiency failure codes or if missing, two codes telling you the heater circuits are open and there is no signal from the sensors.
The computer is expecting to detect the presents of all the sensors.
Good luck.
The rear sensors are in the 'middle' of the stock rear cats.
You will need to place rear sensor 'bungs' at some point just back of the last cat unless the rear cats have that sensor port.
If these rear OX sensors are missing or do not work as designed you will get efficiency failure codes or if missing, two codes telling you the heater circuits are open and there is no signal from the sensors.
The computer is expecting to detect the presents of all the sensors.
Good luck.
Here is some reference information from flow tests conducted on cat converters.
If you spend money on hi-flow cats be sure they truely are higher flowing and then be sure the rest of the exhaust system is not killing the increase or you end up with no chance of power improvement from the investment.
Bottom line is on a stock truck the cats are not much of a restriction for the volume of gas that flows.
If you spend money on hi-flow cats be sure they truely are higher flowing and then be sure the rest of the exhaust system is not killing the increase or you end up with no chance of power improvement from the investment.
Bottom line is on a stock truck the cats are not much of a restriction for the volume of gas that flows.
Great Bottom Line as well -
Bottom line is not to place to much emphisis on a high flow cat change unless the motor is highly modified to make much more hp (pass more air) at higher rpm where the extra flow makes a difference..
Thinking of any performance increase at normal driving speeds from cat replacement is just not realistic because the gas flow is well below any cat restriction point unless the cats are getting blocked for some other reason such as missfire causing temperatures to go so high the internal structure melts and forms a restriction or they break up.
The factory does not leave very much on the table for HP loss from exhaust systems on the normal truck application.
They can't afford to do so from a competitive point.
Thinking of any performance increase at normal driving speeds from cat replacement is just not realistic because the gas flow is well below any cat restriction point unless the cats are getting blocked for some other reason such as missfire causing temperatures to go so high the internal structure melts and forms a restriction or they break up.
The factory does not leave very much on the table for HP loss from exhaust systems on the normal truck application.
They can't afford to do so from a competitive point.
What I see over long term monitoring general operation is that Ford pulls back aggressive ignition timing and leaned the fuel injection. The reasons are another story why.
This loses power and low end torque.
Since we can't have any control over it without some type of adjustable tuner, we live with what we have.
Trying to improve the situation by altering the OEM design usually does not meet with results that are thought to be there because you forget you are 'fighting' the PCM program that needs to be altered to take advantage of the changes "so it's not too productive", for the total 'cost', of disappointment, at the results you get.
Said another way, the motor is being controlled by the PCM program.
Changing parts for expected gains only interfers with the program such that it takes corrective action and nullifies much of the gains you try to introduce.
This is why after market tuning (program changes) by a good shop will net worthwhile gains in the right places depending on the specific intent.
BASICLY the mfger and the Gov. don't want you making changes to anything on the truck.
Ventureing to the 'left', it's called Liberal or socialistic control.
The latest versons of PCM control are built to add an 'inquiry' transmitter and receiver on board your vehichle so it can be accessed by a gov. enity.
They could look at your PCM for codes while your driving and send you a notice to have it fixed if any are detected along with the VIN.
"On Star" is just a step below all this, now.
This loses power and low end torque.
Since we can't have any control over it without some type of adjustable tuner, we live with what we have.
Trying to improve the situation by altering the OEM design usually does not meet with results that are thought to be there because you forget you are 'fighting' the PCM program that needs to be altered to take advantage of the changes "so it's not too productive", for the total 'cost', of disappointment, at the results you get.
Said another way, the motor is being controlled by the PCM program.
Changing parts for expected gains only interfers with the program such that it takes corrective action and nullifies much of the gains you try to introduce.
This is why after market tuning (program changes) by a good shop will net worthwhile gains in the right places depending on the specific intent.
BASICLY the mfger and the Gov. don't want you making changes to anything on the truck.
Ventureing to the 'left', it's called Liberal or socialistic control.
The latest versons of PCM control are built to add an 'inquiry' transmitter and receiver on board your vehichle so it can be accessed by a gov. enity.
They could look at your PCM for codes while your driving and send you a notice to have it fixed if any are detected along with the VIN.
"On Star" is just a step below all this, now.
Last edited by Bluegrass; May 12, 2011 at 07:02 PM.




