Why we shouldnt replace O2
Why we shouldnt replace O2
sensors if there is no code. Can someone explain that to me? I hear people say that if there is no code that we should not change them. But how much of a difference do they make in gas mileage? I drive a lot and I want the best gas mileage I can get. What else can I do then?
Originally Posted by suavehorn
sensors if there is no code. Can someone explain that to me? I hear people say that if there is no code that we should not change them. But how much of a difference do they make in gas mileage? I drive a lot and I want the best gas mileage I can get. What else can I do then?
. The info is stored as a % of failures and won't turn on the engine light until it has failed beyond a certain threshold a certain amount of times. The same is true for misfires. Does that make any sense to you? Any help at all? I don't fully understand it all yet, as there is so much info and it keeps changing year to year. Sorry if that's too much or too little info.
my next question would be why do some people take them off completely? What purpose do they serve? What happens if you have 1 off or all and can you pass inspection? Does it give you more power? Less gas mileage?
you cannot remove o2 sensors...period. you can however remove catalyst efficiency sensors somtimes called downstream 02 sensors which they are not. but a simulator will need to go in place of the sensor. ppl usually do this when removing catalytic converters.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by uknigel2
Most codes don't set until the system is a long way off. So a check on a plug in scanner once in a while to see if your well in range is a good thing.
I don't have any engine codes being thrown up but I wanna check the computer to make sure nothing is out of whack.
With MIL elims you DO NOT have to place the sensor in the pipe(only works on the post cat sensors) you can just wire tie it up out of the way. But If you replace them, replace them in pairs, they wear over time and if you replace just one, the PCM often "sees" the one not replaced as a failed one and sets a DTC.
Originally Posted by |SoCal|Screw
How would I go about doing this?
I don't have any engine codes being thrown up but I wanna check the computer to make sure nothing is out of whack.
I don't have any engine codes being thrown up but I wanna check the computer to make sure nothing is out of whack.
Originally Posted by joshmac4.6
With MIL elims you DO NOT have to place the sensor in the pipe(only works on the post cat sensors) you can just wire tie it up out of the way. But If you replace them, replace them in pairs, they wear over time and if you replace just one, the PCM often "sees" the one not replaced as a failed one and sets a DTC.
Incorrect. The O2 sensor must be installed and must be functional in order for the MIL eliminator circuit to perform its job.
There is no need to replace O2 sensors in pairs if only one has failed. The PCM does NOT compare one side to the other, each bank is controlled separately.
Without a very high baud rate scanner or a VERY good o-scope it is not possible to watch the O2's effectively.
If you have no DTC's then they are most likely fine. If it passes the KOEO and KOER tests, then everything that is PCM controlled or a input is up to "snuff".
I'd start by cleaning the MAF sensor elements. It's easy to do and cheap. If the sensor is dirty, it will definitely cause fuel economy issues since the computer would not be able to properly computer fuel usage most efficiently. It will also cause driveability concerns such as stalling and stumbling.
If you do want to look at the PCM to see if its running significantly skewed from neutral, look at the long term fuel trim PIDs. It is desirable that both banks be as near zero as possible. When badly skewed, that is an indication that there is an imbalance that the PCM is correcting for a degraded condition. Once a LTFT reaches + or - 20%, you will usually get a DTC indicating a lean or rich (P017X) code
Steve
Last edited by projectSHO89; Mar 13, 2008 at 07:29 AM.
and one of the reason's ther is no schedule for 02 replacement -is that it is an emmissions device and ford would be responsible for that- increasing costs and affecting the botton line...
Originally Posted by projectSHO89
Incorrect. The O2 sensor must be installed and must be functional in order for the MIL eliminator circuit to perform its job.
Originally Posted by projectSHO89
There is no need to replace O2 sensors in pairs if only one has failed. The PCM does NOT compare one side to the other, each bank is controlled separately.
O2's to each other. It is a function of the Emissions system, and catalyst monitor.
Originally Posted by projectSHO89
Not really. A $200 hand-held scan tool or a $125 add-on for your laptop will work fine. The O2 switching rate is not particularly fast. The DLC communications rate is only around 10k baud.
Last edited by joshmac4.6; Mar 13, 2008 at 11:36 AM.
Originally Posted by joshmac4.6
Well then I guess everyone who has them tied up and out are working by some miracle. Look into them more, it doesn't matter the location.
Well I guess Ford told me wrong, I'm certified in All electrical and Engine Performance, and they DO compare the
O2's to each other. It is a function of the Emissions system, and catalyst monitor.
At a swichting rate of 5-7 cycles per second that is quiet fast. Can you count to 7 in one second. You can see the O2's on a cheap scan tool, but they are not accurate, you at most get two cycles per second on a fairly good tool. It takes a very good o-scope to get the CORRECT pattern, if you have ever seen a good pattern then you would know what I'm saying. Since we are picking apart each others posts!
Well I guess Ford told me wrong, I'm certified in All electrical and Engine Performance, and they DO compare the
O2's to each other. It is a function of the Emissions system, and catalyst monitor.
At a swichting rate of 5-7 cycles per second that is quiet fast. Can you count to 7 in one second. You can see the O2's on a cheap scan tool, but they are not accurate, you at most get two cycles per second on a fairly good tool. It takes a very good o-scope to get the CORRECT pattern, if you have ever seen a good pattern then you would know what I'm saying. Since we are picking apart each others posts!



