Fram Tough Guard Air Filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #16  
RacingJake's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
From: Abilene
Thanks........will do
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #17  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by jbrew
I keep hearing that it doesn't increase overall ponies - anyone have the proof ? The throttle body will suck whatever you can throw at it.
good call--i'm probably completely wrong with the wot only statement!

it just doesn't make a lot of sense to me--i figure if i want the throttle to suck more air, i can just push the pedal further to open it...once it won't open any further it makes sense that a less restrictive filter will allow it to suck more than a more restrictive one

but, i'm sure there is some loss in the engine due to the resistance of the filter, and decreasing that resistance would understandably increase hp--i stand corrected

however, i will say with confidence that the hp gains are quite small and occur primarily at higher rpms than i drive other than when towing or pull grades--i do admit it feels as if the filter helps in those situations
 

Last edited by ()smoke(); Sep 30, 2007 at 09:54 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 10:04 PM
  #18  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
Yea, really not noticable - I made my own intake - you need a smooth constant flow to notice anything - I made mine from schedual 40 but the best out there for the price is one made by "AIR FX" IMO. The MAF is contained in the original box and there air filters suck air from two ways in instead of the one way K&N - I'm going for one of those ASAP - I might have to bump my injectors to 24's to make them more compatible with that intake set up . It only costs $199 - but they don't advertise much , so they don't need to pay all that overhead.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #19  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by jbrew
Yea, really not noticable - I made my own intake - you need a smooth constant flow to notice anything - I made mine from schedual 40 but the best out there for the price is one made by "AIR FX" IMO. The MAF is contained in the original box and there air filters suck air from two ways in instead of the one way K&N - I'm going for one of those ASAP - I might have to bump my injectors to 24's to make them more compatible with that intake set up . It only costs $199 - but they don't advertise much , so they don't need to pay all that overhead.

i had a k&n kipk for a short time, but i didn't like the off-idle power compared to stock--the AIR FX sounds interesting, will check them out--thanks for the head's up jbrew!
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #20  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
No problem
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #21  
02XLT4X4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
I had a K&N on my old car, even with a factory turbo I couldn't feel a bit of difference over the stock one. If it wasn't a special order I would have returned it and got my $40 back.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #22  
fairlaner's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 16
From: Central Coast, California
After buying my truck used, I popped open the filter box and saw a K&N filter ... I also saw dust on the motor side of the intake tube A paper filter went in that day!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #23  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
Doesn't sound like it was oiled ...
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #24  
02XLT4X4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jbrew
Doesn't sound like it was oiled ...
The only way you can pull more air thru something is with bigger holes, or more holes, the oiling negates more smaller holes. K&N even advertises that they filter better as they get dirtier.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #25  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,535
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
I pulled my K&N the other day - didn't trust it any more. Replaced it with a NAPA Gold paper filter (made by Wix), it was only $13 plus tax. I saw those Fram washables, I wouldn't trust a washable filter to work that doesn't have to be oiled.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #26  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Octane36
I wouldnt use a Fram or K&N and all the claims tht K&N makes about improved horsepower and improved fuel economy are total BS.
I used to have a K&N drop-in filter in my truck and it didnt run any stronger and didnt get any better fuel economy.
Personally, the only 2 filters I would use are a Wix or the OEM filter.
Took the words right out of my mouth. Travel a dusty road and check to see how much that K & N allows into the throttle body. Just not worth slowly dusting a motor to save a couple bucks on a 30k truck
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #27  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
Well you guys are making some good points - I can see how oiled filters can let unwanted foreign matter run thru the motor - over time , it's pretty easy to see that this could be detrimental to your motors health. I run the OEM filter for most of my trucks life - switched to K&N a couple years ago. I found a film inside the metal MAF housing w/granular remnants stuck to the film. I ignored it then.

Thinking more about after reading thru the this thread - there's no way these particles should be found in there - specially when I over oiled it at the time and compromised my MAF.. WOW!! I hope I didn't do to much damage running the K&N - but I had to do some..One little grain of sand can score a cylinder wall. I think I'll pull a compression test again and compare it to last years readings. I have 231,000 miles and want to make it to 300,000 + with this motor..

Thank for the posts - I'll grab a WIX if they have one up at Carquest today..
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #28  
last5oh_302's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
I just threw one of these in. No oiling and they filter up to 1 micron of dust particles. It may require more frequent cleaning, but cleaning it is a snap, and it doesn't take all day like it does with oiled filters.

http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=93
Read the link and see what you think.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #29  
RaWarrior's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Troy, NY
The K&N filters are not the best idea for dusty environments. They don't filter as well as a plain paper one which will eventually foul out your MAF causing lost performance. If you don't mind cleaning that every so often, then I guess you can save a little money by just cleaning and re-oiling. Then again, you're letting dust into the motor, and we all know how well dirt and internal engine components get along.

Claims of more HP and better mileage are BS. For a K&N intake system, yes, you can expect gains. From a drop-in filter? I don't think so.

I use a Purolator filter, because Advance always has them on sale. Then again, I don't have a MAF on my 5.8L. Just because on the 5.8L you have to unscrew instead of snap open the airbox it takes a whopping 5 minutes to change.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #30  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
Just mixed the rest of my K&N Filter oil with half a bottle of Armoral - works great
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.