Buying a 1992 F150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #1  
selbona's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Buying a 1992 F150

I'm buying a '92 F150 XLT 4x4. It's got the 5.0 engine with a 5 spd manual tranny. I was wondering if there were any known issues to watch out for. I'm getting rid of my 2000 F150 supercab 2WD that I know like the back of my hand, but I don't know much about the earlier models. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #2  
Steve83's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 7
From: Memphis, TN 38135, USA, Earth
92 was the last year for vacuum cruise, so that's a negative. It was the first year for that body, which is a positive. No airbags, EEC-IV engine management: good. That transmission is known to leak, and it's VERY sensitive to fluid level/quality, so get it changed immediately. There are other known problems, but I'd expect most of them to have been fixed by now. Read through this thread for some of them.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #3  
RaWarrior's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Troy, NY
Find out what motor is under the hood. Could be the 4.9L straight six, or could be the 5.8L V8. Both were good motors, but the I-6 is almost legendary for it's reliability and high torque.

The Mazda tranny is great when you keep it happy, meaning fluid at exactly the right place and of the right type. Put anything else in or too much/too little, and you'll get problems all day long. Leaks, grinding, stuck gears, hard shifts, ect. When it's working, it's working great.

Vacuum cruise blows. Doesn't work well and breaks easily. I would use it only if absolutely necessary, which IMO is never. People got along without cruise for decades.

If the t-case wasn't used regularly expect it to be essentially a brick. The linkage and "barrel" part of the shifter rust and get coated in road grime, they might as well be welded together. Takes a bit of work to get it going again.

Automatic or manual hubs? I'd guess auto, which isn't bad, but not really good either. They were vacuum powered and tended to stick if the 4wd wasn't engaged at least semi-regularly. The hubs dry out of lube and don't lock/unlock right. They're also somewhat complex to disassemble and repair($$$ and hard to find parts), and don't take a whole lot to break. Not for any serious off-roading by any means.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #4  
Steve83's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 7
From: Memphis, TN 38135, USA, Earth
Originally Posted by selbona
...a '92 F150 ... It's got the 5.0 engine...
Originally Posted by RaWarrior
Find out what motor is under the hood.
Originally Posted by RaWarrior
Automatic [hubs]... were vacuum powered...
No, they're not. Click my signature link & look in the Brakes & Hubs album, and then check the TSB album for the one about "Motoring Torque".
Originally Posted by RaWarrior
Vacuum cruise blows. Doesn't work well and breaks easily.
Like anything else, it works if it's maintained, and it's not difficult to repair. There's a TSB in that same album showing exactly how. It's biggest problems are that it's susceptible to low vacuum (worn engine & high load), and it doesn't have the 1-MPH increments that the electronic servo does.
 

Last edited by Steve83; Apr 28, 2007 at 03:35 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.