Spark plug torque

Old Jan 8, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #1  
Rob Bromley's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Question Spark plug torque

I know there has been a lot of talk on blown spark plugs. I have not seen a cause for sure as of yet. Some say it happened with original plugs and some have had them changed. Have I missed the reason? Has Ford put out a TSB on the subject? I am going to have to change my plugs soon. I am wondering what the torque is on the plugs? Any tips on making it easier?

Sorry for all the questions but I can't afford a new head.

Rob
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 12:54 AM
  #2  
beastie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
I dont have a new engine, but on my 5.0, I just tighten them by hand as hard as I can, then just give them like a 1/4 turn with the ratchet. They are in there good, and this is how I was always taught to tighten plugs. Dont overtighten!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 01:33 AM
  #3  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Re: Spark plug torque

From another thread

Originally posted by TexfordD
stay with the motorcraft,go with the ford performance 9MM wires,gap should be .054",with torge on the plug at about 110 inch pounds....that is Inch Pounds
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 01:33 AM
  #4  
Warren Johnson's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Shelton,Wa. USA
My 2000 Ford 150 Shop Manual says 11 lbs-ft
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 11:38 PM
  #5  
TexfordD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
84 to 164 Inch Pounds....

I've always stayed around 110 Inch Pounds and have had no problems..the Lightining motors would go higher because of the stress placed on the plugs by the blower...heres the conversion table between Inch Pounds and Foot Pounds....1 Inch Pound=0.08333 Foot Pound...1 Foot Pound = 12 Inch Pounds...so 11Ft/Pds= 132 In/Pds..the 84/164 Inch Pounds comes from another manual and the center of that referance is 124 In/Pd....IMHO I'd rather have snug than stripped
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 09:07 AM
  #6  
peterbilt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx.
TexfordD

Is that torque spec using anti-seize on the plugs?

Thanks
Pete
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
SteveB's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Peterbilt - I pretty sure the torque setting won't change depending on whether or not anti-seize is used. Anti-seize is just so you will be able to more easily remove the plugs the second time you change them.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 9, 2003 | 08:50 PM
  #8  
TexfordD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
SteveB is right....

the anti sieze is recommended and taken into account
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:22 AM
  #9  
peterbilt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx.
Thanks for the reply guys. I always use anti-seize myself, but several Ford mechanics I talked to said Ford says not to use it. Of course, they probably would like for you to destroy your heads. The other thing I'm concerned about is if I change my plugs using anti-seize and blow a plug Ford will say you messed with the plugs and not warranty it. It's always something

Pete
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #10  
Rob Bromley's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the info. It is a good point about anti sieze and the warranty issue. I guess you take a chance either way.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.