Totally missing right rear shock
Totally missing right rear shock
Just recently got a new axle put into my F150 by a well known garage shop. My suspension has recently started doing a lot of squeaking. Especially in the front left. Today I replaced shocks in the front. I figured it was ball joints making the noise, but it was time to do shocks 140k. Anyway the guy at advance auto parts said take silicon spray and hit everything in the suspension with it.
As I was spraying the back suspension I noticed the right rear shock was completely missing. Looks like they forgot to put it back in when they put the car back together. I have been driving the vehicle without a left rear shock for about a month. What damage can be done by this, and how should I handle this tomorrow when I show up to the garage.
As I was spraying the back suspension I noticed the right rear shock was completely missing. Looks like they forgot to put it back in when they put the car back together. I have been driving the vehicle without a left rear shock for about a month. What damage can be done by this, and how should I handle this tomorrow when I show up to the garage.
Well since it was a month ago, they need to replace the shock, and last I heard they need to be done in pairs, so my expectation is to have a new pair of shocks out of this deal. I'm just worried that this might have caused me damage to the rest of the suspension.
I am a city driver mostly, what I noticed was squeaking, very annoying squeaking.
I am a city driver mostly, what I noticed was squeaking, very annoying squeaking.
Well I shouldn't even be admitting to this, but this was a blond moment on my behalf. Apparently in the back, one shock goes backwards and the other one goes forwards. I thought they both went backwards, anyway, the second shock was there the whole time.
The squeak was coming from the lower ball joints, having those done as I don't have the tools or patience for that job.
The squeak was coming from the lower ball joints, having those done as I don't have the tools or patience for that job.
Well I shouldn't even be admitting to this, but this was a blond moment on my behalf. Apparently in the back, one shock goes backwards and the other one goes forwards. I thought they both went backwards, anyway, the second shock was there the whole time.
The squeak was coming from the lower ball joints, having those done as I don't have the tools or patience for that job.
The squeak was coming from the lower ball joints, having those done as I don't have the tools or patience for that job.
Trending Topics
Well I shouldn't even be admitting to this, but this was a blond moment on my behalf. Apparently in the back, one shock goes backwards and the other one goes forwards. I thought they both went backwards, anyway, the second shock was there the whole time.
The squeak was coming from the lower ball joints, having those done as I don't have the tools or patience for that job.
The squeak was coming from the lower ball joints, having those done as I don't have the tools or patience for that job.
PS - On the 97-03, the rear shocks just like the front, with a top mount thread, so they can only be mounted one way, body down.
Last edited by kingfish51; Aug 11, 2012 at 10:44 PM.



Included this photo because you can see the bracket on the right has the mounting location for either side of the axle. **NOTE** I mounted both of my shocks rear of the axle for looks! Supposedly the SuperCrews were staggered to help control axle wrap. I haven't noticed anything negative from swapping that shock around.
In all honesty, I would not want shocks that were uncovered and shaft down. One little stone chip and that will tear up the seals to the shock. That plus all the crud having to be wiped by the shock every time it cycles. Much rather have the body down covered shaft shocks.
First timer I have seen 97-03 shocks with the shaft down.
In all honesty, I would not want shocks that were uncovered and shaft down. One little stone chip and that will tear up the seals to the shock. That plus all the crud having to be wiped by the shock every time it cycles. Much rather have the body down covered shaft shocks.
In all honesty, I would not want shocks that were uncovered and shaft down. One little stone chip and that will tear up the seals to the shock. That plus all the crud having to be wiped by the shock every time it cycles. Much rather have the body down covered shaft shocks.
I respectfully disagree with your reasoning and here's why; that hardened steel rod will take 10x the beating of a shock body. One little dent in the body of the shock and it's done. First time a piston has to conform over a dent in the body, its going to start bypassing internally and at that point, it's doing nothing. It will just fade. The body is much better served being tucked away up under the body for protection. The boot is a novelty for appearance only. A boot has to have air holes in it or it'd just blow off each compression. The boots 'can' fill up with dust, dirt, and debris, especially if submerged, and that stuff just stays trapped in there. (Quality) Shocks are designed with at least one, if not multiple 'scraper' rings around the inlet to the body whose sole purpose in life is to wipe away and clean the rod before it approaches the seal. That seal is safe, trust me. Plus you gotta admit, this set up just looks bad-@$$ compared to a shock body down. I have never had a body down shock on this truck, have never had boots on the shocks, and have never had a shock failure or problem.
Last edited by Galaxy; Aug 12, 2012 at 12:59 PM.
Maybe the off-road are all body up, but there is no choice in those as they have a reservoir. As far as OE replacement, The fronts are all body down, and the rears can be mounted either way. I chose body down, just like the fronts. And I am sure, those Baja racers are replacing or rebuilding their shocks before every race, if not during the racing due to break down.



