Suspension
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Rancho RS5236 vs. RS5247

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #1  
Spike Strip's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: da 'hood
Rancho RS5236 vs. RS5247

Hello,

I have a 2000 XLT 2wd and I want to use Rancho RS5000 shocks... The Rancho catalog calls for RS5236 in the REAR w/o the 7700 lb payload pkg, and RS5247 w/ the payload pkg....

Anyone know if the RS5247 will work as a direct bolt up ??

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #2  
Galaxy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 6
Just taking an educated guess here but...I would say the only difference between the two shocks is in the valving becaue there's no difference in how/where the shocks fit the axle/truck. Will it bolt in?? Most likely yea...but why not go with the correct shock listed for your truck??
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #3  
Spike Strip's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: da 'hood
Well, I answered my own question, or Rancho did. I found a number for their tech support and called and got the physical specs on the two shocks: RS5247 will not fit because its lower mounting hole is 14mm whereas the 5236 is 12mm.

I wanted to use the RS5247 because I thought it might be a more robust shock required for the 7700lb payload. There is some diff in the valving, but it's a moot point. Can't use it on the non - 7700lb model (F250, light duty).

So I ordered the RS5235 (front) and RS5236 (rear)

Great price from Amazon.com, btw. $156 bux with free 2-day shipping.

 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 PM.