Suspension
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Leveling Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 02:27 AM
  #1  
BigDaddy06's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Leveling Questions

I am about to buy a leveling kit for my 2006 F-150 4X4. I have a few questions. Is the staggered kit really needed? Some people talk about the angles of the 2.5" kit, but now there is a 3" kit being sold. What does everyone suggest? I want a level truck. It looks like the main choice is a regular straight piece or a staggered one. Please help, as I do not want to have to do this again.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #2  
hivoltagefx4's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, Va.
There are a few things to consider? First, both the 2" and 2.5" kits are fine. Stay away from a 3" as it will put severe angles on your UCA's! Now, if you haul anything, I'd go with a 2" kit. If you do not, go with a 2.5" as that one will make your truck sit level. I am running a 2.5" on my FX4 and it sits level. I would also recommend Autospring. That is what most members here run. They are a good kit and priced right! Here is a link to there site:

www.autospringcorp.com

Also, you want the offset kit which is what AS sells anyway. Good luck!
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #3  
wandell's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 28,203
Likes: 2
From: cairo,ga
I agree.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
BigDaddy06's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Thanks for the imput. Does the staggered unit really make that much of a difference? I need the 2.5 at least do to the tires I have, but I do pull car trailers from time to time. If it sags to much I will have to go with a small block in the rear.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
hivoltagefx4's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, Va.
If you do haul from time to time, you might want to consider a AAL. If you do add one, it may kick up the tail a little higher.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
wandell's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 28,203
Likes: 2
From: cairo,ga
If by "staggered" you mean the new Autospring, it's a good idea. The offset design prevents the a-arm from touching the spring at full suspension droop.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #7  
TbaggsTruck's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: New England
I too am looking for a nice level truck. It sounds that the 2.5 inch produces a more level apperance and is not recomended if any to some towing is to be done. I this just to prevent the rear of the truck sagging during a heavier tow?
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 15, 2007 | 02:27 AM
  #8  
hmfic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: E.C. Wisconsin
If you have a 2006, I'd check first to see how many leafs are in your rear leaf pack first. If you only have 3 total, a Autospring 2" will make you sit level, while a 2.5" will more than likely make the front higher than the rear. Most of the time a 2" A.S. will raise you about 2.5", while the 2.5" Autospring could net you close to 3" or more. I have installed 5 sets of Autosprings now and this is what I ended up with everytime.

I have had the 3" skyjacker lift you mentioned, unless you talking about the truxx. The angles WILL NOT be more severe than the 2.5" Autospring. Trust me, I have docummented this MANY times in the past. I actually got more lift from the Autospring than the Skyjacker 3".
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 02:34 AM
  #9  
hmfic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: E.C. Wisconsin
Originally Posted by TbaggsTruck
I too am looking for a nice level truck. It sounds that the 2.5 inch produces a more level apperance and is not recomended if any to some towing is to be done. I this just to prevent the rear of the truck sagging during a heavier tow?
On a '04, Yes I would go with the 2.5 A.S. to achieve the level stance. When you are level, if you do haul anything, your rear end will sag though.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 06:42 AM
  #10  
hivoltagefx4's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, Va.
Originally Posted by hmfic
If you have a 2006, I'd check first to see how many leafs are in your rear leaf pack first. If you only have 3 total, a Autospring 2" will make you sit level, while a 2.5" will more than likely make the front higher than the rear. Most of the time a 2" A.S. will raise you about 2.5", while the 2.5" Autospring could net you close to 3" or more. I have installed 5 sets of Autosprings now and this is what I ended up with everytime.

I have had the 3" skyjacker lift you mentioned, unless you talking about the truxx. The angles WILL NOT be more severe than the 2.5" Autospring. Trust me, I have docummented this MANY times in the past. I actually got more lift from the Autospring than the Skyjacker 3".

I have an '06 and I went with a 2.5" and my FX4 is perfectly level. Had I gone with a 2" it probably would have not sat level. Then again, that's just my truck.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #11  
BigDaddy06's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
The FX4 looks level, but now I am wondering how many leafs are in the rear on a FX4... The King Ranch of hmfic looks level, and it claims to have a 2" with a add a leaf in the rear. This does not add up. Is there any more thoughts out there?
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:04 AM
  #12  
hmfic's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: E.C. Wisconsin
Originally Posted by BigDaddy06
The FX4 looks level, but now I am wondering how many leafs are in the rear on a FX4... The King Ranch of hmfic looks level, and it claims to have a 2" with a add a leaf in the rear. This does not add up. Is there any more thoughts out there?
I'm not positive of the '06's had 3 or 4 factory leafs. The 07's only have 3. To me, hivoltagefx4's truck looks a hair high in the front, even looking at his other pics. Granted all I have is pics to look at, not the actual truck.

Mine with the 2" A.S. sat dead level on one side, and about a 1/8" high in the front on the other. I just put the AAL on a few days ago, so that pic is not current. It looked great before the AAL, but if I was parked on any slight of a grade or had ANYTHING in the box the rear looked like it was sagging, which to me looks like poo..
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:21 AM
  #13  
Grubrunner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
From: Rich, Virginia
Originally Posted by hivoltagefx4
There are a few things to consider? First, both the 2" and 2.5" kits are fine. Stay away from a 3" as it will put severe angles on your UCA's!
Really?

That one-half inch will make the world of difference, as far as stress in concerend, to your upper control arm?
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 06:40 AM
  #14  
hivoltagefx4's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, Va.
Yes, the extra 1/2" will be to much on the UCA's. To answer HMFIC's post, yes, my truck my look like it is higher in the nose, but my pictures are on a slight grade. When parked at a perfectly level spot, the truck is not higher in the nose.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #15  
BigDaddy06's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Well I did it! I bought the AS 2.5". If it sits to high in the front, I guess I can always a little something to the rear. Thanks for all the help guys!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.