Gas mileage aWith Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 12:37 PM
  #16  
brahmus's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 0
From: Delcambre, La
12 psi, Lightning motor, 4.56 gears 38X15.50R20 tires.. Stop and go town driving I get 10.5. the best I have been able to manage on the hwy was 13. The L bone stock got 17.
 

Last edited by brahmus; Jun 27, 2006 at 08:56 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #17  
97on37s's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Snow Camp NC
U shoud get better milliage with a supercharger. That is if u can keep your foot out of it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #18  
Dixie99's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Deep South
10-11 mpg with a L swap (topside). Back tires suffering too!
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #19  
wstafford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: South Mills North Carolina
Originally Posted by Jordan not Mike
No kidding!
For one tank, I wanted to maximize my MPG. I got 14...

Then I thought to myself, why the heck did I put all this work into it, just to baby it???!!!

Hence...10mpg.
Yep, just got to use if its there! Mid and high 15's when "trying" to not use it ,no lower that 14.3 when playing with hemis so far.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #20  
torturekilla's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
From: henderson, north carolina
Originally Posted by 98Navi
I win this one as usual.

9.1 mpg and I drive that big bastard like a bat out of hell!

ahahaaahah u drive like me right foot glued to the carpet lol
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #21  
phil6608's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 1
From: Wilmington DE
Originally Posted by Dixie99
10-11 mpg with a L swap (topside). Back tires suffering too!
Back tires suffering?
You must be having fun with the new power!
Glad to here it.

Phil
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #22  
madjay97's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
so can anyone give me an idea of the best charger to go for a 5.4 engine?
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #23  
Marc Carpenter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: North Canton, Ohio
I like the Roush, but there are several out there. Its your $$$ so you will have to make the ultimate decision. I am installing the Roush on my '04 5.4 Supercrew 4x4 in a week or so.
Mileage will depend on how you drive your vehicle. My '01 Lightning which made 495/600+ got 17-18 on the open highway. I drove it from my home in Ohio to Troyers shop in Virginia several times and realized that mileage. And my '03 Cobra 475/515 got 22-23 mpg on the same trip.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 07:28 PM
  #24  
inurok's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by madjay97
so can anyone give me an idea of the best charger to go for a 5.4 engine?

Well the Roush seems to be working out great for me. Not the most powerful but the best intergrated imho plus with a 3/36,000 mile warantee you cant go wrong. If you do go Roush pay the extra money and get the intercooler as well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #25  
B-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 3
From: Eastern TN
Originally Posted by 97on37s
U shoud get better milliage with a supercharger. That is if u can keep your foot out of it.
NOPE !!!

Add parasitic drag, you lower MPG - you cannot get around that.

My best tank EVER in the Lightning was 17.4 MPG.

My '01 'Screw routinely got 18 MPG - much bigger and heavier truck too...
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #26  
mab351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Just came back from Carlisle PA after the All Truck nationals. Our 2 Powerworks/Magnacharger trucks (F150 4x4's one with 3.55's and the other with 3.73's) got a little over 17mpg on the highway. Which is really good since one of the trucks was NA going to the show (we installed a kit at the show) and got around 17mpg on the way there. Basically after the install there wasn't much of a change. Again, fuel economy is directly related to the right foot. The roots chargers we use are internally bypassed so there isn't much parasitic loss when the bypass is open, and as long as your in closed loop fuel control not much changes.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #27  
Jordan not Mike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
From: The LBC (Long Beach, CA)
Originally Posted by mab351
The roots chargers we use are internally bypassed so there isn't much parasitic loss when the bypass is open, and as long as your in closed loop fuel control not much changes.
Centrifugals also have a bypass.

So when you aren't into the boost, the only extra drag on the engine is to spin the blowers, but they aren't producing boost so parasitic drag is low, and fuel efficiency isn't affected too much as noted by mab351
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #28  
ganiman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: miami florida u.s.
Mileage shmilage,on average,you will get less miles per tank w/ a charger.And if thats not true,you didnt need the charger in the first place
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #29  
mab351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by ganiman
Mileage shmilage,on average,you will get less miles per tank w/ a charger.And if thats not true,you didnt need the charger in the first place
Can't argue with that!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.