1990 Ford F-150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
etniesbmx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
1990 Ford F-150

Sup guys. Forum looks great! I'm looking at buying a 1990 Ford F-150. Its bagged, shaved, and pretty outdated haha. There is a swapped 351 and it's got dual exhaust. Here's a picture, then I'll explain the story on the truck.



So this picture was taken in 2001, I don't think much has really changed, besides the bags. The owner of the truck drove it while he was going to college, the truck was vandalized on a weekly basis. So he parked the truck at his parents house and bought a Cavalier. The truck hasn't moved since, and its been 5 years. So now the father has decided he needs the room in his driveway and he's selling this beast. So now I'm thinking about taking it on as my first project, mechanically the truck is in mint condition. There's a bit of body work due to said vandalism and it needs new tires, due to sitting so long. The reason I'm posting this up is to maybe get some ideas on what should be done to the truck, etc. I'm also curious as to what I could do to the 351? Parts wise, etc. Nobody I know owns a Ford this old so I'm really hoping you guys can help.

Thanks a ton!
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #2  
fdimeroller's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 1
From: SC
u could start by removing those headlight covers :P
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 03:20 AM
  #3  
etniesbmx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fdimeroller
u could start by removing those headlight covers :P
Haha most definitely would be the first thing on my list!
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #4  
midnight08's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
i would get rid of those rims, swap on a 92-96 front end. what kind of 351 is it?
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #5  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Yes the newer front end would make it look much better. Bigger wheels would look nice.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #6  
EddiesF150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 139
Likes: 1
From: Mesquite, TX
Oops!
 

Last edited by EddiesF150; Feb 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM. Reason: double post
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #7  
EddiesF150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 139
Likes: 1
From: Mesquite, TX
Originally Posted by etniesbmx1
I'm also curious as to what I could do to the 351?

Stroke it out to a 427 601 HP and over 622 Ftlbs of torque!!!

427W Part 1


427W Part 2
 

Last edited by EddiesF150; Feb 22, 2009 at 11:59 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #8  
jsvo5695's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
From: kansas city, missouri
it needs different wheels.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
stoffer's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,678
Likes: 84
From: missing Texas...
Originally Posted by midnight08
what kind of 351 is it?
it'll most likely be a windsor

the 427 or 408 stroker motor would be awsome
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #10  
etniesbmx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Awesome guys! Thanks for the replies.

-Like I said in my original post, the truck needs new tires before it's drive-able. So I'd most likely buy new rims while I was buying the tires. I'm unsure really though rim wise, I was kinda thinking something with a deep dish look. That could look terrible though! I'm not sure haha.

-Front end wise, how much would a swap like that run a guy? Does it just bolt right up or..?

-EddiesF150, that stroker kit is actually an awesome idea! I'm most definitely going to have to look into that more. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #11  
Screw-Me-05's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,329
Likes: 0
From: Native New Yorker
See if you can get some 17" 1st gen lightning rims for it and go from there?
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 12:28 AM
  #12  
etniesbmx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
I checked out the Lightning rims, they seem to look (a bit) like the rims that are currently on the truck. I'm thinking I want something a little more new school to an older truck, kinda thing. Thanks for the reply though! Keep em coming!

Anyone know of any good articles/sites/etc I could read/use to gain more knowledge about the 351W and even the air-bags for that matter?
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #13  
MustangAndy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, NJ
Originally Posted by etniesbmx1
Anyone know of any good articles/sites/etc I could read/use to gain more knowledge about the 351W and even the air-bags for that matter?
Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Windsor_engine


The 351W is often confused with the 351 Cleveland, which is a different engine of identical displacement

The 351 cu in (5.8 L) Windsor featured a 1.3 in (32.5 mm) taller deck height, allowing a stroke of 3.5 in (88.9 mm). Although related in general configuration to the 289-302 and sharing the same bell housing, motor mounts and other small parts, the 351W had a unique, tall deck block, larger main bearing caps, thicker, longer connecting rods, and a distinct firing order (1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8 vs. 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8), adding some 25 lb (11 kg) to the engine's dry weight. The distributor is slightly different to accommodate a larger oil pump shaft and larger oil pump. Some years had threaded dipstick tubes. It had a unique head which optimized torque over high-rpm breathing, frequently replaced by enthusiasts with aftermarket heads providing better performance. Ford offered a performance head that was a stock part on 302 equipped mid 1990's Mustangs called the GT-40 head (casting id F3ZE-AA). The early 1969 and 1970 heads had larger valves and ports for better performance. The intake valves and ports were slightly larger on the early engines. The head castings and valve head sizes from 1969 to 1976 were different, differing in passages for air injection and spark plug diameters (69-74 18mm, 75-up 14mm). From 1977 onward, the 351W shared the same head casting as the 302, differing only in bolt hole diameters (7/16 inch for 302, 1/2 inch for 351W). Early blocks (casting id C9OE-6015-B had enough metal on bearing saddles 2,3 and 4 for four bolt mains) as with all SBF, were superior in strength to most late model, lightweight castings. Generally the 1969 to 1974 blocks are considered to be far superior in strength than the later blocks making these early units some of the strongest and most desirable in the entire SBF engine family including the 335 series. During the 1980s a four barrel version (intake manifold casting id E6TE-9425-B) was re-introduced for use in light trucks and vans. In 1988 fuel-injection replaced the four barrel carburetor. Roller lifters were introduced in this engine in 1994.

The original connecting rod beam (forging id C9OE-A) featured drilled oil squirt bosses to lubricate the piston pin and cylinder bore and rectangular head rod bolts mounted on broached shoulders. There were a number of fatigue failures attributed to the machining of the part and so the bolt head area was spot-faced to retain metal in the critical area, requiring the use of 'football head' bolts. In 1975, The beam forging (D6OE-AA) was updated with more metal in the bolt head area. The oil squirt bosses were drilled for use in export engines, where the quality of accessible lubricants was questionable. The rod cap forging remained the same on both units (part id C9OE-A). In 1982, the design of the Essex V6 engine used a new version of the 351W connecting rod (E2AE-A), the difference between the two parts was that the V6 and V8 units was machined in metric and SAE units respectively. The cap featured a longer boss for balancing than the original design.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #14  
MustangAndy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, NJ
Part 2:


The block underwent some changes since its inception. In 1972, The deck height was extended from 9.480 in. to 9.503 in. (casting id D2AE-B) to lower the compression ratio to reduce NOx emissions without the need to change piston or cylinder head design. In 1974 a boss was added on the front of the right cylinder bank to mount the air injection pump (casting id D4AE-A). In 1979 the oil dipstick tube moved from the timing case to the skirt under the left cylinder bank near the rear of the casting. These details made swapping older blocks from passenger cars with front sump oil pans to more recent rear-sumped Mustang and LTD/Crown Vic Ford cars more difficult unless an oil pan had the dipstick mounted therein. In the 1990s the rear main seal was changed from a two-piece component to a one-piece design and provisions for roller tappets were also added.

Introduced in 1969, it was initially rated (SAE gross) at 250 hp (186 kW) with a two-barrel carburetor or 290 hp (216 kW) with a four-barrel. When Ford switched to net power ratings in 1972 it was rated at 153 to 161 hp (114 to 120 kW), although actual, installed horsepower was only fractionally lower than in 1971.

During the 1990s, motor enthusiasts were modifying 351 Cleveland 2V cylinder heads (by re-routing coolant exit from the block surfaces to the intake manifold surfaces) for use in the 351W resulting in the Clevor (a portmanteau of Cleveland and Windsor). This modification requires the use of custom pistons by reason of differing combustion chamber terrain (canted valves vs. straight valves) and intake manifolds for the Boss 302 was not wide enough and the intake ports were too large. This combination yielded the horsepower potential of the 351C with the ruggedness of the 351W short block. This was possible because more 351C 2V cylinder heads were made than corresponding engine blocks (the 351M and 400 used the same head as the 351C 2V).
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #15  
mmalcolm24's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 360
Likes: 2
Should be a great project truck. Hopefully you get it and start doing your own thing to it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 AM.