1 Kicker Comp CVT 10 vs 2 Planet Audio RX 10s
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Port Neches, TX
1 Kicker Comp CVT 12 vs 2 Planet Audio RX 10s
Looking for opinions on the kicker vs the planets audios, Im more concerned with SPL instead of SQ. I have never ran PA but in my old camaro I had 2 kicker cvr 12's on a kicker kx1200.1 and loved it
*****EDIT Kicker 12" not 10"
*****EDIT Kicker 12" not 10"
Last edited by streetassasin; Mar 5, 2010 at 11:26 AM.
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Port Neches, TX
kicker
Model CVT12
Size (IN.,CM) 12, 30
Impedance (OHMS) 2 or 4
Max Rec Amplifier Power (WATTS PEAK/RMS)* 800/400
Frequency Response (Hz) 25-350
Mounting Depth (IN.,CM) 4-3/8, 11.1
Mounting Cutout (IN.,CM) 11, 28.1
Min Rec Sealed Box Volume (CU. FT., Liters) 1.0, 28.3
Max Rec Sealed Box Volume (CU. FT., Liters) 4.6, 130
Min Rec Vented Box Volume (CU. Ft., Liters)** 1.75, 49.6
Max Rec Vented Box Volume (CU. Ft., Liters)** 2.25, 63.7
planet audio
Power Handling (Peak) 300W
Power Handling (Contin.) 150W
Freq. Response 30Hz-2.5kHz
Efficiency (1 Watt/1 Meter) 90 dB
Impedance 4 Ohm
Magnet Structure 40 Oz
Mounting Depth 4-3/8”
Voice Coil Former 2”
Model CVT12
Size (IN.,CM) 12, 30
Impedance (OHMS) 2 or 4
Max Rec Amplifier Power (WATTS PEAK/RMS)* 800/400
Frequency Response (Hz) 25-350
Mounting Depth (IN.,CM) 4-3/8, 11.1
Mounting Cutout (IN.,CM) 11, 28.1
Min Rec Sealed Box Volume (CU. FT., Liters) 1.0, 28.3
Max Rec Sealed Box Volume (CU. FT., Liters) 4.6, 130
Min Rec Vented Box Volume (CU. Ft., Liters)** 1.75, 49.6
Max Rec Vented Box Volume (CU. Ft., Liters)** 2.25, 63.7
planet audio
Power Handling (Peak) 300W
Power Handling (Contin.) 150W
Freq. Response 30Hz-2.5kHz
Efficiency (1 Watt/1 Meter) 90 dB
Impedance 4 Ohm
Magnet Structure 40 Oz
Mounting Depth 4-3/8”
Voice Coil Former 2”
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
I dont think its really necessary...your comparing a 400w rms sub with a 150w rms sub, and the OP is looking for SPL instead of SQ? Pretty obvious choice i think.
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Trending Topics
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
2 10s will give you 157 sq inches of cone area. 1 12 will give you 113 sq inches of cone area. However, those 10s are very excursion limited so the 12 will likely displace similar amount of air as those 2 particular 10s combined. The 12 will also play lower frequencies with authority in the proper enclosure.
But IMO, I'd go with neither of those options for SPL. Actually I would do neither for SQ either.
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 1
From: ohio
More cone area doesn't necessarily mean more sound. And more power doesn't necessarily mean more sound either...
2 10s will give you 157 sq inches of cone area. 1 12 will give you 113 sq inches of cone area. However, those 10s are very excursion limited so the 12 will likely displace similar amount of air as those 2 particular 10s combined. The 12 will also play lower frequencies with authority in the proper enclosure.
But IMO, I'd go with neither of those options for SPL. Actually I would do neither for SQ either.
2 10s will give you 157 sq inches of cone area. 1 12 will give you 113 sq inches of cone area. However, those 10s are very excursion limited so the 12 will likely displace similar amount of air as those 2 particular 10s combined. The 12 will also play lower frequencies with authority in the proper enclosure.
But IMO, I'd go with neither of those options for SPL. Actually I would do neither for SQ either.