Pre-1997 Models

31-10.50s or 32s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 06:18 PM
  #16  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Here's 31x10.50 General Grabbers (knock off BFG AT) on my 96. I think it filled the wheel wells nicely.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:59 PM
  #17  
usedtodrivechev's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
I had 31's on for years and then switched to 32's because I had the room. I put 2 inch springs on up front to level it out more since it already had helper springs on the rear. The twin I beam has lots of room for alignment. I had it aligned perfectly with no drop brackets. I'm now running 33's. I just had to trim the bumper minimally for 33's. Both the 32 x 11.50's and 33 x 12.50's rub but its not horrible.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 12:10 AM
  #18  
usedtodrivechev's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by poptop
31/1050s on my 96 bronco rub. The gas mileage i lost bothers me more than the rubbing.
x2!
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 12:12 AM
  #19  
usedtodrivechev's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
I had 31's on for years and then switched to 32's because I had the room. I put 2 inch springs on up front to level it out more since it already had helper springs on the rear. The twin I beam has lots of room for alignment. I had it aligned perfectly with no drop brackets. I'm now running 33's. I just had to trim the bumper minimally for 33's. Both the 32 x 11.50's and 33 x 12.50's rub but its not horrible.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 12:28 PM
  #20  
DragonBlod's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: USA
Had a 1980 f250 with 33"s and had mad rub plus had a horrible turning radius. I would stick with stock unless you do the mod to widen your width.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.