Pre-1997 Models

'95 5.8 Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 11:54 PM
  #1  
kretinus's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
'95 5.8 Questions

According to several websites, the '95 Lightning had a 240HP/340ft-lbs 5.8L (W), and the regular production F150 had an optional 5.8L (W) 210HP/325ft-lbs. Not really knowing the relationship between horsepower and torque as it translates where the rubber meets the road, it doesn't appear that there is a drastic difference between the 2 engines, especially in torque, I could easily bolt on enough power to match the Lightning, and I'm wondering how much difference therereally is between the two engines, do they share the same block and just bolt up different heads etc, could I add Lightning parts to my block for any gain etc.?
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #2  
metallion's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
The Lightning 5.8L was quite different than the standard model. It used a different flat tappet cam and hypereutetic pistons. The heads are cast iron GT-40 model. The intake is the high performance GT-40 model. It used a special distributor cap and spark plug wires. It had shorty headers instead of cast iron exhaust manifolds and a true dual exhaust system. Honestly, 240 hp is slightly underrated. I have read that some owners made that much hp on a chassis dyno at the rear wheels. Additionally, the Lightning used a 4.10 gear in the diff. You should be able to modify your truck to emulate the Lightning, but those original components are hard to come by and/or expensive. There are mods for your engine that still use the stock intake and will get you noticeable gains. Check out a Ford Racing Performance Parts catalog. You might find some good stuff in there. Have fun!
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #3  
greenbird's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
I thought the lightnings got a roller cam?

the 240hp and 210hp are peak numbers. They really don't mean alot, you'd have to look at two dyno graphs to see the real difference.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #4  
kretinus's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by greenbird
I thought the lightnings got a roller cam?

the 240hp and 210hp are peak numbers. They really don't mean alot, you'd have to look at two dyno graphs to see the real difference.
I'm just going by Ford's own specs. If you're aware of any information that can put it into perspective I'd appreciate it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 06:23 PM
  #5  
greenbird's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
30 peak hp doesn't make a very big difference, but the reality is closer to 30 average hp, which is a huge difference.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #6  
metallion's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I used to think that the Lightning 5.8 HO got a roller cam too until I found a spec sheet (forget where) that said otherwise. However, all '94 and up 5.8 blocks are roller cam ready. Look for casting number F4TE to be sure.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.