Typo on headline...BE not me
Saw this on Drudge:




UNEMPLOYMENT RATE DROPPED IN EVERY STATE THAT ELECTED A REPUBLICAN GOV. IN 2010

Well well well......i.be.dam'..........I wonder how this happened.....

Any retorts from the libtards???





In 2010, influenced by the Tea Party and its focus on fiscal issues, 17 states elected Republican governors. And, according to an Examiner.com analysis, every one of those states saw a drop in their unemployment rates since January of 2011. Furthermore, the average drop in the unemployment rate in these states was 1.35%, compared to the national decline of .9%, which means, according to the analysis, that the job market in these Republican states is improving 50% faster than the national rate.
Since January of 2011, here is how much the unemployment rate declined in each of the 17 states that elected Republican governors in 2010, according to the Examiner:
Kansas - 6.9% to 6.1% = a decline of 0.8%
Maine - 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6%
Michigan - 10.9% to 8.5% = a decline of 2.4%
New Mexico - 7.7% to 6.7% = a decline of 1.0%
Oklahoma - 6.2% to 4.8% = a decline of 1.4%
Pennsylvania - 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6%
Tennessee - 9.5% to 7.9% = a decline of 1.6%
Wisconsin - 7.7% to 6.8% = a decline of 0.9%
Wyoming - 6.3% to 5.2% = a decline of 1.1%
Alabama - 9.3% to 7.4% = a decline of 1.9%
Georgia - 10.1% to 8.9% = a decline of 1.2%
South Carolina - 10.6% to 9.1% = a decline of 1.5%
South Dakota - 5.0% to 4.3% = a decline of 0.7%
Florida - 10.9% to 8.6% = a decline of 2.3%
Nevada - 13.8% to 11.6% = a decline of 2.2%
Iowa - 6.1% to 5.1% = a decline of 1.0%
Ohio - 9.0% to 7.3% = a decline of 1.7%
On the other hand, the unemployment rate in states that elected Democrats in 2010 dropped, on average, as much as the national rate decline and, in some states such as New York, the unemployment rate has risen since January of 2011.
This is yet another example of how the so-called “blue state” model is not working

 

We'll be hearing "The Almighty" say that HE did something to make that happen.

 

Some of that data is skewed.....why???

a few of those states had republican governers that termed out and another republican was voted back in.....

 

Blue states would rather raise taxes that hurt small business owners. They think you can tax your way into prosperity. Sadly, I live in one of the blue states because of Chicago.

 

You know....I cringe when I hear bambam talk....Used to I couldn't stand it and I would change the channel at the first sight of him....It is knee jerk reaction to do it now...But, I think it is absolutely hilarious to listen to this dip chit' talk....You can hear how unsure of himself he is in his voice..You can hear his fear...you can hear his ignorance...you can tell he is lying his *** off....you can hear the desperation...and I laugh...........0o0o00o00o how I laugh....then I have to hurry and change the channel before I go totally bastchit' crazy....
so0o0oo0 glad this @#$@#$@#$$@#$#%#$^ is gunna get sent packin' in Nov

 

I have a pair of orange cowboy boots......your argument is invalid.... (See, you see how dumb that sounded? Kind of like being hit in the face with a wet towel when you read something like that...isn't it)?



The point it is....GOP GOV states unemployment went DOWN.....while the libtards pull their pud in the street....

 

Moved to appropriate forum.

- Jack

 

.................................................. ....thought it was................................

 

Hopefully he'll be out. There's too many uneducated followers that know nothing. The worry you hear in his voice is wonder if/when the teleprompter will go down...it's all over then.

 

don't let that noose cinch to tight when you fall off your soap box bud.....just was stating the facts that's all....

have a great day

BTW the forum does have a political section where this thread should've been posted in the first place.....

edit....thanks Jack for moving it

 

Would be nice if it could be hacked and edited in real time

..... .......... ............

yes........

 

The article was not intended to lead one to believe that it were only turnover elections in which this applied...The article just stared the facts...No information skewed...possibly misunderstood...Wasn't meaning to sound like an ***...

 

no harm done....the writer of the article missed that.....not you....

 

C'mon Jack...... when did this become the "bait" forum?

 

- Jack