Using an 8.8 traction loc up front?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #1  
The Saint's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Using an 8.8 traction loc up front?

Hello;

I was surfing Craigslist and noticed an 8.8 Traction loc out of a mustang and thought hmmmm, would that work in the front differential of my 02 FX4?!?!

Has any attempted this? Or is there a 'no brainer' reason that it wont work?

If not, I was looking at Detroit EZ locker. Anyone have input on using these? My truck is used mainly on the street, but occasionally in the mud.

I would appreciate any input.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
joshmac4.6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
From: Western NC
It would be great if you like only going straight in 4wd.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 03:43 AM
  #3  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
the ford tracloc will work fine up front if its a 28spline unit, i dont think the mustang rear is a 28 spline unit though?

do not run a ezlocker up front, i did and i regret it soon as i tried to drive in 4x4 on snow/ice. but i can crawl up some crazy crap if i get the front tires to bite.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #4  
The Saint's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Does anyone know what (if any) model/year fords came with a 28 spline 8.8 traction loc carrier?

I think that the mustangs are 31 splines..right Klitch?

Although, I could probably buy the 28 spline side gears (if the carrier was cheap enough).

Klitch, any ideas on how a traction loc (up front) would change my daily driving? Since my 02 does not have lockout hubs, would/could this cause a few drive ability issues? Or would the carrier remain unlocked without power being applied to the ring and pinion?
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #5  
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
A locker in the front diff of an IFS vehicle just doesnt sound like a good idea.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #6  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
i dont think a LS up front is going to make a difference. also, i believe the ranger/exploder ran a 28spl 8.8? double check that.
 
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 09:05 AM
  #7  
Bindernut's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: ND
Originally Posted by mSaLL150
A locker in the front diff of an IFS vehicle just doesnt sound like a good idea.
I'll second that. It's gonna raise holy he** with your CV joints in the long run.
On a Twin-Trac-Beam in a 80s-early90s model yeah it'll do alright, but on the 97-up halfshaft setup it's gonna cause trouble.

A limited-slip unit will be better than the EZ-Locker, but it's still going to be quite a strain on the CVs.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 2, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #8  
RayD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Mustangs were 28 spline until 05. As far as it being a good idea in the front? Beats me, if it's like the one in the rear of my truck it should be back to working like an open diff in a couple thousand miles anyway. You might want to look into a Posi-Lok for the center disconnect so you have manual control of that. Good luck, let us know how it turns out.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2008 | 03:18 AM
  #9  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
well ill be honest, the trac-loc is floating around pretty low prices on ebay. but if i would do my front end again i would either do a helical gear ls like a tru-trac eaton, or a selectable locker. possibly the ected.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #10  
tnsilverfx4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 860
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN
28 spline setups were in a few mustangs, i cant remember what years. Late model rangers and explorers do have 28 spline axles.

As far as lockers up front, do a selectable. It gives you alot more freedom. For the record, i have an ected in the front of my truck and have had no problems. If you drive SMART you have nothing to worry about.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #11  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
is the ected rather tight in LS function? my bro's in his ranger is tight enough to bark the tires on asphalt when turning with ected in ls. locked that things nuts lol
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #12  
RayD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
All pre 2005 Mustangs with 8.8 were 28 spline except possibly Cobras/Mach 1s? Not sure about those. Ranger 8.8s are 28 spline except FX4 Level 2s which had 31 spline Torsens. <--nice First body style Explorers are 28 spline, 95-01 (disc brake axles) are 31 spline, not sure about IRS 8.8s in the newer explorers. I'll agree with you on the TruTrac, Klitch. I just missed a barely used trutrac on ebay awhile back, i think it went for under $300. I hadn't decided whether to put it in the truck or Mustang but I wanted it bad. I don't have much experience with the ected, my old boss had them in both ends of his frankenstein ****** wagon with Scout D44s but I never got to drive that in four wheel drive.
 

Last edited by RayD; Aug 5, 2008 at 07:26 PM. Reason: brain fart
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #13  
tnsilverfx4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 860
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN
is the ected rather tight in LS function? my bro's in his ranger is tight enough to bark the tires on asphalt when turning with ected in ls. locked that things nuts lol

klitch, its fine in 4 wheel as just a LS unit. The locker function is just "insurance" You summed it up.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #14  
Code's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Klitch
i dont think a LS up front is going to make a difference. also, i believe the ranger/exploder ran a 28spl 8.8? double check that.
Explorer 8.8's are all 31 spline. Rangers, i'm not sure on.

I've found this on TRS though:

1) 1986-up "Incomplete vehicles" also known as "Chassis Cabs" were frequently equipped with 8.8" 28-spline axles, the '86-88 examples are distinctive as they are the only 8.8" Ranger rears that have no provisions for a RABS sensor.

2) 1990 & up 4.0-liter Rangers. These are ALWAYS equipped with the 8.8-inch 28-spline rear axle.

3) 1998-up 4x4 supercab Rangers regardless of powerplant are frequently equipped with 8.8" axles

4) FX4 Rangers 99-current come equipped with an 8.8 rear and 31-spline axles with either 4.10 or 4.56 axle ratios.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 04:36 PM
  #15  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
code, you need to double check the year ranges for the axle spline counts. i think pre 94 was 28 spl. dont quote me on it but i think its a strong possibility
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.