4.10 swap done

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #31  
WhitePony5.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, Washington
I am assuming that you guys have a 9.75" rear ends in your trucks, I am looking into swapping over to 4.10's with my 22's on my truck, but I can find what vehicles came with 4.10's???? or did you all buy NEW aftermarket gear sets?
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #32  
Jordan not Mike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
From: The LBC (Long Beach, CA)
Originally Posted by WhitePony5.0
? or did you all buy NEW aftermarket gear sets?
Yes.
I don't think 4.10s are offered on a production Ford equipped with the 9.75 rear, but I could be mistaken.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #33  
built54's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
I dont think so either. Mine are ford racing gears
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #34  
JohnBoy88's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 2
From: North Central Florida
I was quoted $750 total after parts and labor. Does that seem right or can I get a better deal?
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #35  
Lumadar's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
My 2005 Screw with a 9.75 rear-end had 3.55 LS stock, and I went to a Ford Racing 4.1 setup for about $600 installed on my 2wd.

The difference is definitely noticeable, but to be honest if I could do it again I probably would have gone 4.56. I didn't at the time because I thought I might supercharge someday, and at that point traction off the line would have been a real problem.

Also, my tires are only 32 inches tall, about 1 inch different from stock height. I think it was like 5-6% change. The 4.1 is very drivable for me.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #36  
electricfrank's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Hahntown, Pa.
4.10's stock tires!

Originally Posted by built54
i couldnt imagine my truck with stock size tires on it.... I think 4.10's on a stock f150 would be too much. But Im not sure with 3.73's as stock
I changed from stock 3.55 to 4.10's ,finately manual shift with 265/70/17's and it definately was a huge improvement in acceleration and torque! Didn't notice much drop in mpg,It sucked from the getgo anyhow !? lol!
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #37  
crash_lucky13's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: off the path in Louisiana
i switched mine out from 3.55's to 4.10's. i have the 9.75 rear end and 20" wheels and running a 275/45r20 toyo proxes s/t. noticed a HUGE gain off the line, but the top end died. without the supercharger and just my edge tuner, i couldn't get it over 105 on a dead run.

I DID however notice and increase in mpg (I do alot of city driving) with the stock tune right now i hit about 18 mpg (16mpg before) and with an extreme tune with my edge i'm at 15.1 mpg.

should be throwing my supercharger and everything back on this weekend.

oh yeah. if you're asking how long it should take you to change your gears......


DO NOT TRY TO DO IT. my truck was apart on my lift for almost 2 weeks while i was tinkering with it trying to get it right.

don't try and cut corners on this. it won't work. spend the money and get it right
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #38  
built54's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
Yeah I agree, if you havent done it, let a pro do it, and watch him do it. Crash, I cant believe you cant get over 105. At 100 in 3rd gear im at 4500rpm, and I still have 1 more gear... Do you not have the power or are you in OD at redline?
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #39  
crash_lucky13's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: off the path in Louisiana
not redlining so i'm thinking more on the power side. I'm customizing me a good program for the edge now though and we'll see how she does. getting a custom tune made to throw in my predator for the supercharger so that should help big time when i reinstall it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #40  
Jordan not Mike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
From: The LBC (Long Beach, CA)
Something isn't right...your top speed should be higher with the 4.10s.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #41  
crash_lucky13's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: off the path in Louisiana
ummm you sure on that killer? i THINK you have that backwards.....

or am i wrong?? because with the 3.55's i had ****ty low end with good top end but now i have killer low end with crappy top end
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #42  
built54's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
Originally Posted by Jordan not Mike
Something isn't right...your top speed should be higher with the 4.10s.
You mean just the opposite, lower gears(higher the number) will slow you down up top.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 08:46 PM
  #43  
Jordan not Mike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
From: The LBC (Long Beach, CA)
That's not what I mean at all.

No matter how short the gears you install, you won't reach redline in top gear. While your THEORETICAL top speed with 3.55s is higher, the gear is so tall that you can't pull it.

4.10s will allow your to pull higher revs, much closer to your power peak.

Consider many sports cars with 6-speed manual transmissions.
Theoretical top speed is much higher in 6th.
But in reality, top speed is reached in 5th.
Why is this? because 6th is too tall to pull.

My Expy pulled well over 130mph in 4th gear on 4.10s, and I had plenty of revs left (but ran out of courage). I guarantee you it wouldn't have done that with the 3.31s that I had in there originally.

Neal the HP freak has 4.10s with small-ish tires, like 29 inches.
He's posted a top speed of over 150mph.

Trust me, the 4.10s are not going to limit your top speed to 105mph.

The following misconception is patently false:
Lower gear = better low-speed acceleration, while taller gears = better high speed acceleration.

The truth is:
***Until you reach redline, lower gears provide superior acceleration AT ALL SPEEDS***
 

Last edited by Jordan not Mike; Jun 18, 2007 at 09:22 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #44  
crash_lucky13's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: off the path in Louisiana
bud, i don't know how to say it, but i think you just changed the way ALOT of people (not just ME) thought of something. I've read you're other posts, and you don't seem to be too far off on most stuff, so i'll go with ya on this. I've HONESTLY never thought of it that way. everything i've always read or heard

smaller gears=better top end
higher gears= better low end




oh yeah. kudos man. (and this is not a sarcastic remark either)

Originally Posted by Jordan not Mike
That's not what I mean at all.

No matter how short the gears you install, you won't reach redline in top gear. While your THEORETICAL top speed with 3.55s is higher, the gear is so tall that you can't pull it.

4.10s will allow your to pull higher revs, much closer to your power peak.

Consider many sports cars with 6-speed manual transmissions.
Theoretical top speed is much higher in 6th.
But in reality, top speed is reach in 5th.
Why is this? because 6th is too tall to pull.

My Expy pulled well over 130mph in 4th gear on 4.10s, and I had plenty of revs left (but ran our of courage). I guarantee you it wouldn't have done that with the 3.31s that I had in there originally.

Neal the HP freak has 4.10s with small-ish tires, like 29 inches.
He's posted a top speed of over 150mph.

Trust me, the 4.10s are not going to limit your top speed to 105mph.

The following misconception is patently false:
Lower gear = better low-speed acceleration, while taller gears = better high speed acceleration.

The truth is:
***Until you reach redline, lower gears provide superior acceleration AT ALL SPEEDS***
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #45  
Jordan not Mike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
From: The LBC (Long Beach, CA)
Originally Posted by crash_lucky13
bud, i don't know how to say it, but i think you just changed the way ALOT of people (not just ME) thought of something. I've read you're other posts, and you don't seem to be too far off on most stuff, so i'll go with ya on this. I've HONESTLY never thought of it that way. everything i've always read or heard

smaller gears=better top end
higher gears= better low end




oh yeah. kudos man. (and this is not a sarcastic remark either)
Think of it this way:
When you are on the highway and you want to pass someone, do you:
A. Upshift to a taller gear because it provides better high-speed acceleration?
or B. Downshift to a shorter gear to get into the meat of the power curve?

Short rear ends killed top speed back in the day, when cars had narrow-ratio 3-speed or 2-speed Powerglides. But these trucks have wide-ratio trannies, geared very tall for MPG reasons.

On my Expy with 4.10s and street tires, I towed in third. Yet I was still under 3000 rpm at 65 mph. OD was too tall to pull comfortably at towing speeds, even with the supercharger.
 

Last edited by Jordan not Mike; Jun 18, 2007 at 11:54 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.