Successor to the Lightning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #1  
Triton46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Successor to the Lightning

Thoughts?

http://media.ford.com/newsroom/featu...?release=20266
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #2  
max mitchell's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 0
The exact reason I bought a back up.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #3  
PNYXPRS's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: PA
Having gone from a Mustang to an F150, this is the perfect vehicle for me. My only hope is that they put a bench seat in the back, so I can fit all 3 of my kids in it. I will definately be trading in my F150 for this when it comes out.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
That would be alright.......as a regular cab truck.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #5  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
SVT has recently increased from 120 to 200 employees. They have stated that there are going to be 5 SVT vehicles.

After the Mustang and Explorer... what does this leave? Fusion probably. 500 probably not. Excursion getting killed. There is already a Shelby version of the Expedition... this really leaves me to believe there will be another Lightning. Maybe another SVT Focus.

Let's just see if the next Lightning is a Supercab or not.


I just don't see SVT versions of Econoline or Crown Vic (they tried the Marauder and failed)
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #6  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
A SVT Focus has got to be in the works. The sport compact market is huge and the US companies have got to put out a quality compact that can be modded for the ricer crowd. The Focus is a great base but needs some factory oomph & aftermarket support.

No way the next Lightning will be a supercab. Roush toyed with the idea with the last-gen Lightning, but it never made it to market. D'oh!
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #7  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
^^^

Not to mention a Supercab L would be defeating the purpose of a "sport truck". I dont look at a Supercab and say, "man, I bet that thing is fast". I look at it and say, "I bet that thing is roomy".
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 5, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Depends on how many SRT-10's are reg cab vs quad cab.

Look at all the Harley guys that wanted an L but still needed a backseat. There is the potential to sell more crewcab lightnings than reg cab (with the appropriate sticker thereby making more money)
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #9  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
I understand and can respect that.

But in my eyes the Harley is a "tough guy cruiser". The lightning is the street rod tough guy truck. Street rod trucks shouldnty have a "backseat".

But then again...this is my OPINION.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #10  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Originally posted by jamzwayne
I understand and can respect that.

But in my eyes the Harley is a "tough guy cruiser". The lightning is the street rod tough guy truck. Street rod trucks shouldnty have a "backseat".

But then again...this is my OPINION.

I don't disagree. It's just a different team calling the shots vs when the L was developed.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #11  
Ford Lariat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
:-/ It kind of looks like a Sport Trac. Would take some getting used to, for me. Maybe if it wasn't in red.

IMO the L's should stay reg cab or even advance to supercab...but leave the supercrew out. The extra weight might inhibit winning times through the finish line
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #12  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
^



I agree.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #13  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Ford Lariat
:-/ It kind of looks like a Sport Trac. Would take some getting used to, for me. Maybe if it wasn't in red.

IMO the L's should stay reg cab or even advance to supercab...but leave the supercrew out. The extra weight might inhibit winning times through the finish line

unless that April Fool's gag about a blown V10 is actually true... and Ford was just testing the waters with an email hoax.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 AM.