Long tube headers
Long tube headers
I am contemplating long tube headers. For those of you who have done it, what HP/TRQ increases or change in ET have you seen? I ahve a 2001 with chip, pulley, bassani catback, and high flow cats. Thanks in advance. By the way how much louder are they.
Matt
Matt
I went with JDm Longtubes and catback. Full meal deal.
Here is my opinions is it worth it? YES
I went from a best of 13.084 @ 104 mph
to a 12.64 @ 109+ mph.
I also added a BAbolt TB since then. I don't thnk the TB helped that much.
this is just my facts, others may have different ones.
Here is my opinions is it worth it? YES
I went from a best of 13.084 @ 104 mph
to a 12.64 @ 109+ mph.
I also added a BAbolt TB since then. I don't thnk the TB helped that much.
this is just my facts, others may have different ones.
Originally posted by QKSILVR
...this is just my facts, others may have different ones.
...this is just my facts, others may have different ones.
Beefcake dynoed 5hp more.
Vinnie ran quicker after his.
I felt more of an improvement, but added way to many mods between the time I installed them and ran at the track, so I have no hard facts if they helped.
But they look good and sound even better.
I ran a 12.59 with just the cat-back at 1/4 tank.
One week later.I added a roll pan and long tubes and ran a 12.35 at 1/2 tank.
The weight of the fuel equals the rollpan and it was only one week later.
I was very happy with the results.
VINNIE
One week later.I added a roll pan and long tubes and ran a 12.35 at 1/2 tank.
The weight of the fuel equals the rollpan and it was only one week later.
I was very happy with the results.
VINNIE
I was probably the first person to post independent longtube dyno results back in april or may of 2001. The longtubes I had were from lightningperformance.com; long before the Kooks came out.
If my memory serves me correct, my peak horsepower increased 7.0rwhp. Torque increased around 15 ft/lbs. At lower rpms (3300) I gained a maximum of 12rwhp & 17ft/lbs (or something like that). I had high flow cats dynomax race magnums and an H-Pipe. Sounds fantastic.
Some people think the headers make more of a difference when you increase the boost. I probably would not argue with that. Nobody has run 11s or without headers (and a big pulley) as far as I know.
Bottom line....I would do them again, but, if you are looking for most bang for your buck then go with a chip, filter and pulley first.
If my memory serves me correct, my peak horsepower increased 7.0rwhp. Torque increased around 15 ft/lbs. At lower rpms (3300) I gained a maximum of 12rwhp & 17ft/lbs (or something like that). I had high flow cats dynomax race magnums and an H-Pipe. Sounds fantastic.
Some people think the headers make more of a difference when you increase the boost. I probably would not argue with that. Nobody has run 11s or without headers (and a big pulley) as far as I know.
Bottom line....I would do them again, but, if you are looking for most bang for your buck then go with a chip, filter and pulley first.
I was running 12.50's @ 109 with a 4 lb pulley, chip, filter, Efan, Water Pump. I had the Headers and Full Exhaust installed upgraded to a 6 lb pulley, and and ran a 11.91 and 11.92 @ 114.63 over the weekend. Now you tell me if they are worth it???? LOL
Trending Topics
spiro went 11.40's with stock manifolds on his truck!
In the dec. issue of PHR magazine, JayDM claims 20-25 hp and 40ft/lbs with his long tubes. Um, yeah right
.
Originally posted by RTKILLA
spiro went 11.40's with stock manifolds on his truck!
spiro went 11.40's with stock manifolds on his truck!
7 Spiro99SVT -------- 1.712, 11.408 @ 113.56
Now that 11sec timeslips are nothing new....that 60', 1/4 mile time, and MPH are a little off....maybe it was a 10 second run and had to hit the brakes for some reason.



