Lightning

Tire air wacky idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:09 PM
  #1  
Coldie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Tire air wacky idea

Has anyone/Does anyone use different gasses in their tires? I was thinking something like argon for even heat distribution....

Coldie
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:20 PM
  #2  
Don's Bolt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,166
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, Ma
I have used Nitrogen in the past
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:40 PM
  #3  
litnfast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl.
Why not Helium?
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:45 PM
  #4  
95 Saleen S351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I prefer Hydrogen Myself.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #5  
bodawg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: PDX
Helium atoms are VERY small, and will escape over a much shorter amount of time than air or even Nitrogen. Ever wonder why a mylar balloon filled with helium deflates over time? Because the helium is actually passing through the pores in the mylar, and those pores are really small.

Nitrogen is the way to go for racing applications. Totally inert gas, no water vapor to worry about, larger molecular structure, etc. . .

Or maybe you were joking
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:49 PM
  #6  
Coldie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Gasses...

Hydrogen and Helium are bad due to their lifting abilities... (and the whole explosive hydrogren part.

Nitrogen would be nice. Argon is lighter and a better insulator, so I figured it would work best.

This was just my stupid ideas because I've got SCUBA gas mixes laying around...

Coldie
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 05:57 PM
  #7  
litnfast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl.
Originally posted by bodawg
Helium atoms are VERY small, and will escape over a much shorter amount of time than air or even Nitrogen. Ever wonder why a mylar balloon filled with helium deflates over time? Because the helium is actually passing through the pores in the mylar, and those pores are really small.

Nitrogen is the way to go for racing applications. Totally inert gas, no water vapor to worry about, larger molecular structure, etc. . .

Or maybe you were joking
I was I never really have spent much time thinking about why balloons deflate. Only thing I've ever concerned myself with is how to reinflate after IT's deflated... But I guess thats another thread altogether
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 25, 2002 | 06:06 PM
  #8  
Coldie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
So...

The question is: which one is better Nitrogen or Argon? Nitrogen is much more available (78% of air), but I think Argon would work better.

Coldie (wihsing I was racing)
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 06:53 PM
  #9  
bodawg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: PDX
I can't imagine you will notice any difference between using Argon or Nitrogen. Go with Nitrogen, easier to get ahold of. . . and it's what the big-boys (professional road-racers) use.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2002 | 07:47 PM
  #10  
Coldie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
heh...

Actually Argon is easier for me to get (since in SCUBA you are always interested in lowering Nitrogen, I don't have any tanks of it...)

Coldie
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.