Lightning

October Car and Driver.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
coopersunc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
October Car and Driver.

If you haven't seen this article, check it out. Very entertaining.
http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caran...review_ssr.xml
 
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane


Hmmmmmm. I wonder what side pipes would look like?
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 02:46 AM
  #3  
The Orphaner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Teays Valley, WV
WTF?

Why the hell build some throwback vehicle like that with some interesting styling then put some panty-waist engine in it that will only rival a PT Cruiser? Cheby has their head up thier A$$ first X'n the Camaro then this...LOL.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 03:12 AM
  #4  
QKSILVR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Machesney Park, IL
They have always had there head up there Ahemm.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 10:41 AM
  #5  
jeff2001silver's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
base price 38,500 damn that ***** expensive.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 11:12 AM
  #6  
air1kdf's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
That truck is sweet, still like the L better though. Thanks for the post. Around here everybody was telling me how the Chevy SS truck will smoke my L. I just said bring it on, I'll believe it when I see it. Now with it 2 seconds slower in the 1/4, I doubt that they'll ever try it. Plus at that price. Damn, GM missed the boat again. If they drop it by 10K, it would be a good seller. Hopefully Ford reads these boards. Ford is right where they need to be w/ the L. 32,8xx base is perfect, for a SC truck like the L. Soon GM will wonder how they will recoupe all of that R&D, and what they can salvage. Don't they ever do a study to find out what people are willing to spend before building it? I guarentee that they will sell less than 4,000 of those/yr. And they thought that the F body was selling poorly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 11:32 AM
  #7  
ib fast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Great Lake State
The looks are not to shabby....but what does SSR stand for....Super Slow Racer
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 21, 2002 | 11:35 AM
  #8  
mecca's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,464
Likes: 0
From: Davie, FL
I think that thing is fugly. On the other hand, I like the Chevy Silverado SS comin out soon... although it doesn't compare to the L, it looks good IMO!

-Mike
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 11:35 AM
  #9  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
SSR was supposed to have the 6.0L. Chevy drops the ball again.

If it comes down to changing the SC on the L for more power, or buying a Silverado SS and putting a blower on it, AWD and more cubic inches might be the deciding factor. Tough decision for me to make. Bleeding blue would make things simpler.
 

Last edited by Odin's Wrath; Sep 21, 2002 at 11:40 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 01:33 PM
  #10  
felonious's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Did nobody else read the second page of that article? Here's a quote from the SSR PRODUCT MANAGER!

"This isn't a rival for the Ford SVT F-150 Lightning," says Walczyk.
At least they know their place.

-Ollie
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 02:20 PM
  #11  
seattlesnake's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Everett, WA
I think that's great!

Now that **** have something else to drive besides Miata's and Z3's.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 02:53 PM
  #12  
air1kdf's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Yes I did read it. It really was supposed to go against the L. When the weight came in at 4600 LBS they changed their tune. That is 1000 LBS heavier than they thought. They only thing they kept was the price for a GM that supposed to go against an L. hehehehe. Like I said the SSR manager should be looking for a new job, because he surely won't keep his position for long. Mark my words. For over $38,000 it will be a flop. Let me guess, nobody here would actually pay that much for it.

Originally posted by felonious
Did nobody else read the second page of that article? Here's a quote from the SSR PRODUCT MANAGER!


At least they know their place.

-Ollie
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 03:14 PM
  #13  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
From the beginning, the SSR was to be a vehicle in it's own class, and not aimed directly at the L. It was, however, to have more punch than it ended up with.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 03:40 PM
  #14  
thepawn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ, USA
I like the retractible hardtop.

Dan
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2002 | 05:06 PM
  #15  
Fast Gator's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,632
Likes: 1
From: Stinkin Joisey
I bet it looks good in my mirror
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 PM.