SAE vs. STD Dyno Comparison!
To Everyone: ALWAYS have your #'s displayed in SAE. That is the ONLY true way we'll get accurate comparisons of these trucks.
Here's the reason why:
BfB's '01 COMPLETELY Stock using STD as the correction:

BfB's '01 COMPLETELY Stock using SAE as the correction:
Here's the reason why:
BfB's '01 COMPLETELY Stock using STD as the correction:

BfB's '01 COMPLETELY Stock using SAE as the correction:
I have no idea what my cylinder head temps were, as we didn't measure anything else but the power. It was a HOT day, let's just put it that way 
Here's an "Actual" power graph with conditions, though:

#'s on Actual were:
Max Power = 330.15 Max TORQUE = 398.26
As I said, it was a NASTY hot day and the humidity was awful (near 100%).

Here's an "Actual" power graph with conditions, though:

#'s on Actual were:
Max Power = 330.15 Max TORQUE = 398.26
As I said, it was a NASTY hot day and the humidity was awful (near 100%).
Last edited by BfB; Jul 21, 2002 at 11:26 PM.
Re: SAE vs. STD Dyno Comparison!
Originally posted by BfB
To Everyone: ALWAYS have your #'s displayed in SAE. That is the ONLY true way we'll get accurate comparisons of these trucks.
To Everyone: ALWAYS have your #'s displayed in SAE. That is the ONLY true way we'll get accurate comparisons of these trucks.
The only accurate way to use a chassis dyno is to do before-and-after comparisons on the same dyno.


