Lightning

2004 Lightning News (AWESOME!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:23 AM
  #1  
BfB's Avatar
BfB
Thread Starter
|
Banned For Rules Violations
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL, USA
Thumbs up 2004 Lightning News (AWESOME!)

I just read Ford Hourly and they stated that there will be an all new 2004 Lightning!!! They are changing the name to Thunder, and it will have a 6.8 V10 with supercharger, 7-speed manual new Tremec 3560, with optional 8-speed automatic (yes, 8-speeds!). They repeatedly stated that horsepower and torque will be 543 and 782 respectively.

I can't wait!!!

(P.s. this is total bull***** LoL )
 

Last edited by BfB; Jul 11, 2002 at 10:22 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:25 AM
  #2  
02Thunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Now I gotta say Bullshiit!

sorry, Ford doesn't know what they are doing next year, let alone 2006.

joe
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:26 AM
  #3  
soap's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Where is that BS flag when you need it

--Joe
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:27 AM
  #4  
BfB's Avatar
BfB
Thread Starter
|
Banned For Rules Violations
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL, USA
LoL, Soap, come on...didn't you read it too?
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:31 AM
  #5  
BadAzz516's Avatar
Rest In Peace
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
From: Right Flucking Here Ni66a
Exclamation

Can you post a link to that i would like to read that myself? Sounds nice if its true but how much will it be and why would they change the name to thunder Thats just dumb if its true why would they get rid of the name brand lightning that people know and sounds way better. Just my $0.02.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:32 AM
  #6  
DUCK01's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Satire threads must be a new concept to the folks on this board. LMAO @ BfB, though!

DUCK
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:33 AM
  #7  
Marc Carpenter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: North Canton, Ohio
Don't know what you are on down there in Alabama, but I want some.
Marc
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:33 AM
  #8  
PIZZALIGHTNING's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
GOOD AND BAD

SOUNDS GOOD BUT STICK COULD BE BAD .Make it slapstick
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:35 AM
  #9  
BadAzz516's Avatar
Rest In Peace
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
From: Right Flucking Here Ni66a
Wink

BFB
Just read the 2005 Ligthning post now i know why you posted this .
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:37 AM
  #10  
kidtriton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: kinston nc
Originally posted by 02Thunder
Now I gotta say Bullshiit!

sorry, Ford doesn't know what they are doing next year, let alone 2006.

joe
You'd be suprised, the 94 bodystyle mustang was approved in 1989, and the 97 truck bodystyle was approved like in 94 or 95.

Its just the people that are "in the know" arent talkers, and thats why they have those jobs.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 08:54 AM
  #11  
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 1
From: SE Mich
I'll disagree w/the tranny and power "claim"

However I did design a water pump; for and Ford built at least one 6.8L V10 supercharged extended cab Lightning back in about 96 or so.

Personally though, it makes no sense for ford to do anything other than fine tune the current 5.4L S/C engine. There is no *current* competition to begin with. And IF one does show up, and IF papa ford wants to *better* them? Then all they'll have to do is to squeeze a bit more out of what they currently have. And we all know it's pretty easily done too.

It would make ZERO sence for ford to develope a new powerplant that strong and then have to make everything downstream strong enough to take it.

Especially when you look at the majority of who is buying these things new. How many people would shudder at the thought of a $50k 3 passanger truck? In that price range there are other things to look at as well.

Just my 2 cents, WOT
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 09:09 AM
  #12  
99svtlightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
From: Elkton, MD
I'm sure it will have the new PowerStroke diesel tranny. It saves up energy during deceleration into hydraulics. During a hard takeoff the hydraulics release the power and thrust the vehicle forward.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 09:12 AM
  #13  
BfB's Avatar
BfB
Thread Starter
|
Banned For Rules Violations
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL, USA
I can't believe how gullible some of you people are! I was JOKING! derr
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 09:15 AM
  #14  
ib fast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Great Lake State
I heard it was going to be an f 18 engine with a one speed.
so your source must be mistaken.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2002 | 09:40 AM
  #15  
95 Saleen S351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally posted by jefflaws


You'd be suprised, the 94 bodystyle mustang was approved in 1989, and the 97 truck bodystyle was approved like in 94 or 95.

Its just the people that are "in the know" arent talkers, and thats why they have those jobs.

Now THIS is a smart guy. First intelligent post I have seen in a while.

 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.