Lightning

2002 Si

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 11:49 PM
  #1  
WaveBlaster785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: MD
2002 Si

Hey guys (and girls)
My buddy just ordered a new Civic SI, I showed him the Lightning numbers and he got a little upset....lol, thought I would share, but does anyone know the skidpad, 0-60, and 1/4 of the new SI?? I know everyone here is anti-rice. If the new SI is anything like the old one, I know where they got the name minute rice from....that's how long it takes it to get down the 1/4 ....haha, jk, thanx in advace
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #2  
CrazyFoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: Clinton Twp, Michigan
0-60=5.8
1/4=13.9 @ 103???(I think anyways)
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 11:55 PM
  #3  
NOSTROMO
Guest
Posts: n/a
Give me a Break
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 11:57 PM
  #4  
J15BIG's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
Originally posted by CrazyFoo
0-60=5.8
1/4=13.9 @ 103???(I think anyways)
really???
thats faster than i thought
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:00 AM
  #5  
01whiteLight's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
ummmm.... are you posting lightning times?

the 2002 SI is as follows

0-60= 8 seconds
1/4= 16.2 @ 86mph
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:04 AM
  #6  
WaveBlaster785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: MD
hey 01whitelight, where did you find those numbers, or are they just estimated?? I would hope it is faster than that, lol, 0-60 with a calendar, but the last SI was faster, are those numbers arbitrary or did you find them somewhere, just curious??
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:06 AM
  #7  
jeff2001silver's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
The 99 and 00 SI is faster, and anyway honda's suck.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:07 AM
  #8  
01whiteLight's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
www.car-stats.com the numbers come from car & driver
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:09 AM
  #9  
CrazyFoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: Clinton Twp, Michigan
i dont know what i was thinking! I MEANT THE LIGHTNING!!!!!! lol oops
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:09 AM
  #10  
WaveBlaster785's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: MD
thank you for the info guys....
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:59 AM
  #11  
ICULOKN's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Tell your buddy to get the RSX Type-S. Much nicer and faster car!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 10:39 AM
  #12  
captainoblivious's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by ICULOKN
Tell your buddy to get the RSX Type-S. Much nicer and faster car!!
Yeah. If he wants something reasonably fast and somewhat sporty, help him at least get a car that can do 15's stock.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 11:17 AM
  #13  
95 Saleen S351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Tell him to get a SVT focus and slap a Jackson Racing blower package on there.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 12:03 PM
  #14  
CNYELO's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Personally I woulda went with that new neon srt-4 thats comin out ina few months..the thing looks bad,,and runs low 14s stock
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.