Lightning

more mods equal less power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 05:27 PM
  #1  
JBsvt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Down South, USA
more mods equal less power

I cant figure it out, I ran a 12.40 on mt streets with a jl chip and 50 shot dry system, stock pulleys and filter. The other day I added an lfp upper pulley and a JL 5lb lower with the 50 shot and only ran a 12.20 at 111mph. It seems the more you do to these trucks the more it takes to make them quicker. Is anyone else having this problem or what gives?
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
smokingozzy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, Mi USA
Wink

I think with our trucks you can gain a lot at first with just a few mods, and then the faster you get the more it takes to gain a little more! I think for the mods you have you are running pretty darn good!
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 05:37 PM
  #3  
Onelfastlride's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Florida
It might have something to do with Aerodynamics ?

The faster you go, the more Aerodynamic drag is created therefore requirring greater amounts of power to over come it. Look at your truck, now look at a Vette or Viper or whatever, what do you think will have the most drag?

Just my $.02

 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 05:38 PM
  #4  
MRBBQMAN's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Wink

the first few seconds cost a few hundred, the last few tenths cost a few thousand. thats been a problem for some time now
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 06:19 PM
  #5  
Ebbsnflows's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
What were the weather conditions? specifically Barometer and humidity? Those 2 things will make or break your track times. Sometimes you have to look below the surface.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 08:07 PM
  #6  
Jay Lincoln's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: La Habra, CA
The law of diminishing returns.

The quicker you get, the harder it is to make big gains. I guess I may be too conservative for this group, but I like to make one change at a time, and flog it to death, until it just won't improve any more. That way you get your money's worth out of your mods.

My .02
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 08:12 PM
  #7  
ICULOKN's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,VA
Compare 60 foot times, weather, & track conditions. All that comes into play bigtime!!!!
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 24, 2001 | 08:30 PM
  #8  
LIGHTNINROD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 0
From: Warner Robins, Ga, CSA
If you have the stock exhaust system(?) still on, you may be 'choking' off all that extra 'air' being compressed. I think mine is suffering from that situation but I d/k for sure.

Dan
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 08:54 PM
  #9  
Hamrhead's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Hatfield,PA
Re: more mods equal less power

Originally posted by JBsvt
I cant figure it out, I ran a 12.40 on mt streets with a jl chip and 50 shot dry system, stock pulleys and filter. The other day I added an lfp upper pulley and a JL 5lb lower with the 50 shot and only ran a 12.20 at 111mph. It seems the more you do to these trucks the more it takes to make them quicker. Is anyone else having this problem or what gives?
So, what you're telling us is that you ADDED an upper AND lower pulley, but did nothing to your chip (fuel&timing adjustments etc.) to compensate for all the added boost? Your truck is now pushing at least an extra 6 psi(upper and lower pullies) of boost. If it were me, I'd be callin JL and inquiring about a reburn before you do some damage to that motor by leaning it out too much.
That *may* have something to do w/ your ET's. Maybe not. I would think JL might have some ideas.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 09:08 PM
  #10  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally posted by LIGHTNINROD
If you have the stock exhaust system(?) still on, you may be 'choking' off all that extra 'air' being compressed. I think mine is suffering from that situation but I d/k for sure.

Dan
BINGO!!

You're at the point where long tube headers will make a huge difference. You have to work on that air-flow from both ends. I've only got an extra 5-6#s of boost and don't see any point in going any further without a set for myself.

If you haven't reburned your chip, that will make a difference, also.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 10:39 PM
  #11  
DL's Avatar
DL
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
Hey,

I think its time for Long Tube headers..Our local track isn't the greatest, it goes uphill close to the end of the 1/4 mile, Plus there was a cold front moving in the area. It's usually pretty high humidity in GA.

Hey Odin's Wrath, can you replace that Porsche 911 with a Lightning?

Dan, He has the full Bassani exhaust with the shorty headers and X-Pipe.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 11:23 PM
  #12  
Spade$'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Just as BBQ said the first few seconds are easy. You have to realize that the required MPH greatly increase per sec the further down you go. D= V*T is an equation that everyone knows. but since D is a constant inorder to isolate T (what we all are looking at) the equation D/ V = T or D/ T= V. I wish that I could draw on this board but in the first eqation the value V must increse exponentially to change T. Since acceleration is the derivative (change per given unit ie second) in velosity the value a=d(v) or .5(v)^2 (notice the squared function). In the second the same applies but inversely. Now for a few numbers for yall to tickle your fancy...
(these numbers come souly from the equations above)

if a car (truck) got a 20second Et... (1=1 mph/mile) : Distance/ Time = Velosity so....
1/4mile = 1320ft.... 1320/20sec = 66mph.... now that's bad but if we move it to only 1 second faster the velosity changes from 66 to 66.47 only a .5mph change now lets move that WAY down... from say 15 down to 14 sec.... 15 seconds = 88mph and 14sec = 94.3 mph now that's a 6.3 mph change... doesn't sound like alot but we all know what even 1mph can do. These mph seem slow because of the acceleration curve that any multi geared car. It's concave down (accelerating at a decreasing rate). But now for the extreme. the fastest L so far is 11.2 @ about 118. now the difference between the 20sec car @ 66 and 11.2 @ 118 and a 10sec flat @132mph.... now if i change the te by .2sec the mph goes up to 134.5 at that it's 2/10= 2.5mph.... Hope that helps a little
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 11:26 PM
  #13  
CornerCarver's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Over yonder somewhere
Does JL know it's a "dry" shot (higher injector duty cyle needed)as opposed to a "wet" shot (no increase in injector duty cycle, just timing)? Need to make some runs and check the plugs... the ones that are easy to get to.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 11:44 PM
  #14  
soap's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Wink I follow you brutha

Spade$.........Being an engineer I had to take more than my fare share of math and unfortunately I understood everything you said

Merry Christmas........Joe
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2001 | 12:27 AM
  #15  
BlowM3's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Originally posted by Onelfastlride
It might have something to do with Aerodynamics ?

The faster you go, the more Aerodynamic drag is created therefore requirring greater amounts of power to over come it. Look at your truck, now look at a Vette or Viper or whatever, what do you think will have the most drag?

Just my $.02

It has everything to do with Aerodynamics. You are right on the money!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.