Internal engine differences for Lightnings
Internal engine differences for Lightnings
I'm not a Lightning owner but I do have an Eaton equipped 04 Cobra and was wondering if the Lightning has a forged bottom end like the Cobras, crank/pistons/rods, or is it just the same as a normal f 150 5.4 with a factory installed blower. Or maybe just lower Compression pistons or larger chambered heads to be boost friendly???????? If it is just a stock 5.4 with boost, how much safe boost or horsepower figures are people getting away with. I have a regular 5.4l f 150 that I installed a Procharger D1sc pumping 9 psi of boost into and was just wondering if I'm being a little too greedy for a cast and hypereutectic bottom end.
the lightnings/harley trucks have a better (forged) bottom end than the "normal" (cast) F-150's.
be careful with the "non forged internals" on the lightnings and harley's the rods are the weakest link.
be careful with the "non forged internals" on the lightnings and harley's the rods are the weakest link.
All 5.4 2 valve Triton truck engines used forged pistons and forged (powered) rods. All non-Lightning 5.4s use the F7 forged crank from 97 to 00. Starting in 01, Ford used a cast crank in the non-Lightning 5.4 and kept the F7 crank in the Lightning motors.
The 01-up cast crank can still take a ton of power. I mistakenly used one in one of my old motors, and pushed 20+ psi through it with 150 shot of spray on top for over a year and a half. It wasn't until I tried running a 300 shot on top of 26 psi of Whipple that I snapped the cast crank.
The weak link in any 2 valve 5.4 is the powdered metal rods. They tend to give up the ghost at about 450rwhp on the average.
The only thing to keep in mind on a blown regular 5.4 is that it's got a bit more compression than a Lightning 5.4 (8.8 vs 8.4).
Hope this helps.
Incorrect.
All 5.4 2 valve Triton truck engines used forged pistons and forged (powered) rods. All non-Lightning 5.4s use the F7 forged crank from 97 to 00. Starting in 01, Ford used a cast crank in the non-Lightning 5.4 and kept the F7 crank in the Lightning motors.
The 01-up cast crank can still take a ton of power. I mistakenly used one in one of my old motors, and pushed 20+ psi through it with 150 shot of spray on top for over a year and a half. It wasn't until I tried running a 300 shot on top of 26 psi of Whipple that I snapped the cast crank.
The weak link in any 2 valve 5.4 is the powdered metal rods. They tend to give up the ghost at about 450rwhp on the average.
The only thing to keep in mind on a blown regular 5.4 is that it's got a bit more compression than a Lightning 5.4 (8.8 vs 8.4).
Hope this helps.
All 5.4 2 valve Triton truck engines used forged pistons and forged (powered) rods. All non-Lightning 5.4s use the F7 forged crank from 97 to 00. Starting in 01, Ford used a cast crank in the non-Lightning 5.4 and kept the F7 crank in the Lightning motors.
The 01-up cast crank can still take a ton of power. I mistakenly used one in one of my old motors, and pushed 20+ psi through it with 150 shot of spray on top for over a year and a half. It wasn't until I tried running a 300 shot on top of 26 psi of Whipple that I snapped the cast crank.
The weak link in any 2 valve 5.4 is the powdered metal rods. They tend to give up the ghost at about 450rwhp on the average.
The only thing to keep in mind on a blown regular 5.4 is that it's got a bit more compression than a Lightning 5.4 (8.8 vs 8.4).
Hope this helps.
HI!... All regular N/A 5.4 2-valves come with hypereutectic pistons yielding 9.0:1compression (not 8.8). I know this because I called MAHLE up directly who makes the pistons for Ford and was told this 3 separate times, when I was researching their MAHLE forged race pistons for my built 5.4.
.
HI!... Like that ever stopped them before. lol! Most of their H.P/TQ #'s are not close either. Or their MPG ratings.
Well, either way, the 8.8:1 or 9:1 sounds pretty boost friendly, The hyperuetectic pistons scare me a little though. I'm sure the crank and the rods will live under moderate boost, but those pistons better have a "controlled" burn above them though. I'm thinking safe tuning @ 9psi and I'll be fine.
Trending Topics
Well, either way, the 8.8:1 or 9:1 sounds pretty boost friendly, The hyperuetectic pistons scare me a little though. I'm sure the crank and the rods will live under moderate boost, but those pistons better have a "controlled" burn above them though. I'm thinking safe tuning @ 9psi and I'll be fine.






